Considering The Societal PerspectiveSocieties say children are innocent and born full of innocence.
Even if this is true, clearly, innocence is not a shield. Innocence does not protect children from the actions and inactions of others. So what is the benefit of being innocent? Is it just a designation and nothing more? It is. In a society, a place that disregards the Rights of Creation, how can a child have any period of innocence where the child is indeed protected from every evil?
This is not possible in a society. What a child eats, whether from the breast or not, has been tainted with toxins by the imbalanced food system that produced it.
In most cases children and their parents are forced to get shots, vaccines and immunizations. All this this starts in the womb because the mother most certainly takes in toxins from a variety of sources, including those often promoted prenatal vitamins. Some who read this are getting more upset by the minute that the uselessness of innocence is suggested when it comes to children who live in societies. These upset people are more upset about the society they love being brought into question rather than being upset about the harm inflicted on all children from Day 1 of conception, including themselves. Mad at me for bringing the logic of their education and other ideas pursued religiously into question on the basis of observation and experience as it relates to self and all else. The upsetness occurs because the truth exposes their logic in its light, leaving them naked, ashamed, afraid and then angry at the wrong folks for seeing what the light exposed. All this happens because their childhood period of innocence was taken away which did not allow them to develop in a cocoon of balance (healthiness).
Imbalance Does Much Damage To InnocenceThere is no avoiding the truth of the matter that the actions and inactions of people in societies automatically removes any benefit of innocence.
For instance, the people, acting as a group, remove the innocence of truth by teaching lies in the education-religion system and everywhere else the child turns to for help and guidance. Once a group of people form themselves into a society and establish imbalance as the overall philosophy, then all guarantees of Rights Of Creation are off the table and cannot exist within the society.
In a society where the guilty go free constantly, why shouldn't the innocent be harmed constantly?
The net effect of all the motions that sets the guilty free is the same net effect that continues on and harms the innocent child – including the innocent child of the guilty.
This is why it is in everyone's best interests, who love themselves and who love children, to prevent imbalance in the first place and restore balance immediately in the second place. Under a status quo of imbalance there are more guarantees of the harmful occurring than there are guarantees of the helpful occurring.
This is precisely what people living in societies experience. Life and existence is filled with an imbalanced amount of hardship, pain and suffering and for an abnormal amount of time because the status quo of imbalance has no interest in preventing or removing what it promotes and what the very existence of the society is predicated upon. All of this is self-created and continued generation after generation, each generation having opportunities to change fundamentally for the better, if they so choose. Shape-shifting, window-dressing and permanent bandages do not count. (UC#577)
Switching Gears Slightly To The Reflection In The Mirror ImageAre the children of humans the only ones who we consider innocent and deserving of protection from the lower-self spiritual workings of humans?
When pain, suffering and “death' are experienced by young plants, insects and other animals, what do we attribute this to?
Instincts? Survival? Survival of the fittest? Stuff happens? That's just how life is supposed to be for them?
Think about some of the stuff humans do to children who are human but not considered human. We wage war on their countries, drop bombs on them, use bully behavior to sanction them and scare others into not helping them, starve them, introduce viruses, poison the air and water and the list goes on and on.
We take land from other baby creatures, kill them remove baby plants, spray poison on them, throw babies in the trash (seeds), pour hot water down ant holes and the list goes on and on.
Humans do a whole lot of harm to a whole lot of children of all species. We impute the righteousness of innocence to ourselves and, with the impunity of this innocence, we take innocence away from all else. In no way do societies respect or protect the innocence of any child ever. This is epitomized by two groups of people: (1) those who exist in every area of society who do nothing to self-improve the logic of the society and do everything to prove the logic of imbalance is a good thing to sustain and (2) those who exist in every area of society who take imbalance to maximum levels. In other words, these two groups are the so-called good people and the bad people, both of which, have children who somehow start out with the promise of innocence while being born into conditions designed to ensure the promise remains a promise and nothing more.