Using PI In Formulas For Squares, Rectangles, TrianglesMonumental Age Of EgyptUnity Consciousness #1547

.

(Part 9py of 11)

More Context

First there was one land of the Nile Valley, then it was divided into the birthplace of the Great Lakes and Mestrea. Then Mestrea was divided into Upper and Lower Mestrea. Then Lower Mestrea was divided into Upper and Lower Egypt. Thus one land became two became three. These three lands can be viewed as parent, prepubescent child, pubescent child. The third division of the land is inclusive of both sides of the cataract at Suan, Abu Island and Philae Island. This is just a partial way of describing the whole perimeter of Earth as it is separated into water and land and as the land has morphed from its dry land Pangeal state. We understand that a description of Earth must include smaller formations within Earth such as continents, oceans and rivers. To understand Earth is to understand the whole total and at least a fair amount of macro parts. Likewise, to understand PI as a means of determining the perimeter and area of the circle also necessitates understanding the components of PI and their relationship to the whole and to each other. This is what we've been able to accomplish so far. The circle and PI are representative of dots, lines, squares, rectangles, triangles and more. So another way of understanding PI as a measure of the circle is to understand the broader context of PI and then also understand the smaller context of PI as a measure of other shapes.

PI is not just about circles.

PI, More Identified

Continuing from our re-conceptualization of PI in the previous message, We learn PI, as word and concept comes from at least three places:
1. An abbreviation of PerImeter. PI-meter, PI-mater. Mater as in matter, maternity, mother, mature, nature .
2. PI is a form of BI, TI, DI. All of which mean two in one and one in two.
3. Pi comes from pi-shen-teriu or shenteriu or shenter or center. The perimeter begins at the center. Perimeter gives us the word Periem as in coming forth. Periem-hru is coming forth to day. The periem comes forth from the perimeter which begins at the center, both of which are forms of the whole total.

PI-Shen-Teriu

Shen is a circle, orbit, round, period, perimeter, a whole, Twin, and Two (NG1 144/162), (BB 183-4/195-6, 186-7/198-9, 200/212, 394/406)
The shen as the perimeter is described as a place of reaching the limit, turning and returning, ebbing and flowing like the banks of a river or a beach. This describes the circle of the waters that is the universe, out of which all things came forth.
Teriu is the two times, and the complete circumference of the round of the year and the cross. (BB 261/273, 297/309)
The Teriu, as the place of the two times, is where the two in one became three in one. Thus “Teriu” also represents three. Kep-en-terui is the corner of the circle where the concealed sanctuary of the two times exists. Kep-en-terui exists at all four corners of the circle. Through Teriu and Kep-en-terui, we can understand Mesteriu (mysteries). (BB 333/345, 424/436)

Pi-shin is the circuit, the twin-total of the Two Truths typified by the two waters or by the Pshent Crown and Apron. (BB 285/297)

PI is the circuit made by the circle and the circle formed by the circuit.
Sheni also means the common crowd, the multitude, to be, to go. (BB 228-9/240-1)
Pi or Pui means to fly. (NG2 519/527)

Using PI With Squares

PI is a constant number that allows us to estimate dimensions of circles. We are still on the path of questioning PI, while using the concept to learn more about the measuring of other shapes.

Three Versions of the Same Formula To Find Perimeter of A Square:
1. 4 (S) - Since the formula for the perimeter of a square is always 4S, then 4 is constant and 4 is the PI of a square.

2. Pi * (S) - This formula substitutes PI for 4.

3. Pi * (D) - Since each side of a square is also equal to the diameter of the square, we can substitute D for S. As you can see, this is the same formula as for the perimeter of a circle, except of course, the value of the constant, PI, is different because the shape being measured is different.

Three Versions Of The Same Formula to Find Area of Square:
1. W (width) * H (height).

2. S^2 - One side squared.

3. PI (R^2) - Since the diameter of a square is equal to one of its sides, the radius is equal to one-half of one side. As you can see, this is the same formula as for the area of a circle, except of course, the value of the constant, PI, is different because the shape being measured is different.

Using PI With Rectangles

Four Versions of the Same Formula To Find Perimeter of A Rectangle:
1. Add all sides -

2. 2H + 2W - Since the formula for the perimeter of a rectangle is always 2 L + 2 W, then 2 is constant and 2 is the PI of a rectangle.

3. Pi * (H + W) - This formula substitutes PI for 2.

4. Pi * (D1 + D2) - Since each side of a rectangle is also equal to a diameter of the rectangle, we can substitute D1 for H and D2 for W. As you can see, this is the same formula as for the perimeter of a circle, except of course, the value of the constant, PI, is different because the shape being measured is different.

Two Versions Of The Same Formula to Find Area of Rectangle:
1. H * W

2. PI (2 * (R1 * R2)) - Since a rectangle has two diameters equal to each of its different sides, a rectangle also has two radii equal to one-half of each diameter. As you can see, this is still the same formula as for the area of a circle, except of course, the value of the constant, PI, is different because the shape being measured is different.

Using PI With Right Triangles That Form Squares

...to be continued in this same space...

References: BB; NG1; NG2; AE1; AE2

PI Origin, History & Nile Valley AfricaMonumental Age Of EgyptUnity Consciousness #1546

.

(Part 9px of 11)

“PI” is a culmination and combination of multiple measurements. I suspect the Ancients measured squares, circles, triangles and rectangles on Earth and determined perimeters, areas and angles and the amount of time it takes to move from one point to another. This was then translated to the above. This process must have taken tens of thousands of years. Way more than 4,400 years BCE that we might think it took based on a misrepresentation of the Age and Awakening of Egypt.

PI cannot be determined until the dimensions of squares, rectangles and triangles are determined.
Neither can PI be determined outside of optimal theory and the african utamawazo.

The circle must be re-conceived in relation to zero.
The whole must be re-conceived in relation to its parts.

This message does not give a bunch of dates and individual names as to the origin and history of PI because it is redundant to do so in light of all other world history origins that came forth out of the Nile Valley of Africa that forms the basis of all cultures today, no matter how misused, abused and disfigured the foundation. Any book or article that suggests PI originated outside of the Nile Valley of Egypt, is operating in a contradictionless illusion. There is no basis of natural fact to support the origin and history of PI as beginning and being perfected outside the Nile Valley. None, except wishful thinking and flat out thievery and lying on paper that is fast becoming exposed as vapor.

It is not possible for one person to create anything. PI is a collaboration of many generations. And thus this is true of all things.

Understand the nature of help and helping.

Extremely Brief Review of Circle & Zero

Zero and Circle are the same things. When one is used, the other is always implied, whether we are aware of it or not. This provides a side by side perspective of the same thing. Zero is part of the binary pair that forms all calculations. This means zero must be the basis of all reckoning since a computer is a metaphor for brain, cell, circle, zero. The number “1” in the binary pair of 0 and 1 is the second form of zero. Zero duplicated into double zero. This was the first form of the binary pair. Zero is the wholeness ratio expressed as 0/0, which is the percent sign (%) which tells us 0/0 is the whole 100 percent. And this is why all numbers are based on 100% because it represents the wholeness ratio, thus zero, thus the circle, thus the universe, thus all circles, no matter what size. Even the number 360 is based on 100 because it is based on 10.

Now we can begin to understand the basis of what PI means and why it applies to all circles.

Recovering From The Numbness Of Numbers

A number is not an empty, lifeless thing. All numbers are another form of an already existing creation. Thus the creation and the number are one and the same, neither can exist or does exist without the other. Numbers existed before humans existed. Numbers are an inherent part of the universe. Numbers help provide additional information for perceiving, recognizing, identifying, knowing, calculating, ordering and so on.
A numbers is simply one of many ways of expressing and communicating the whole total. A number is the same thing as a word, symbol, metaphor. Thus numbers are used to understand the circle, and the circle is used to understand numbers.

A Few Definitions

We shall relate everything to some aspect of the circle or in terms of zero because it already is anyway.
So now we move on to geometry. Geometry is the study of earth measurements.
Geo is earth and the soul of life in Earth as Geb (Seb).
Me is Na.
Try is ter.
Thus we have earth-na-ture. We can call geometry, earth's nature symmetry (sem-metry).
Geometry is understanding the symmetry of earth's nature with universal nature. This symmetry exists in layers, just like Earth. One way of knowing is through measuring and quantifying symmetry based on Earth. That's geometry. But this is woefully insufficient by numbers alone without other meanings of the symmetry being measured. And this is the great fatal flaw of the current suboptimal context of today's societies that permeates thinking and behavior.

Zero represents 0.
Circle represents 1.
Diameter is simply a division of nature of the circle. Thus diameter represents one-half and two.
Radius is half of diameter. Thus radius represents one-fourth and four.
Perimeter is the distance around the circle. Also called circumference.
Area is the space inside the circle.
Perimeter and area are the same thing as time and space.
Perimeter and area define the time and space of the territory (ter-it-tory) Ter is Teriu. Tory is Troy. And from this we can easily get to story and stroy as in history and destroy.
Through the Ter of the IT, the story unfolds and is told. The ter of the it is also the truit. (BB 430-1/442-3)

We'll add a few more definitions later.

Points & Lines

A line is a segment from point A to B in one direction. This can be straight or curved, open or closed.
A point gives birth to, and is the beginning of a line.
The points and lines of the primary shape we perceive are not the only ones there.

Squares

Perimeter = 4S (S = one side).
Area (units squared) = W (width) * H (height).
“Units squared” means the number given or reached represents units in 4 directions to form a square. For example, 7 square inches means an Area that consists of 7 inches to the right, 7 inches down, 7 inches back to the left and 7 inches up. This forms a 7 square inch square. Square inches or inches square is the same thing. Furthermore the units are squared because two single direction or single plane units (inches) are multiplied with each other. These two units must be from two sides touching each other. One in one direction, the other in another direction. (Inches times inches equals square inches in the same way that a number multiplied by itself represents squaring the number. The same kind of units multiplied by the same kind of units equals units squared. Inches times feet does not equal square inches or square feet, it equals a mess. Convert one unit to the other unit before performing any calculation.
To say this another way, when multiplying two sides of a shape, this allows those two sides to represent all four sides. For instance, when multiplying the bottom with the left side, this allows the top side to be included because the top is connected to the left side and the length of the top side is included in the bottom, which is already being multiplied by the left side. Last of all the same applies to the right side because it is connected to the bottom side and the length of the right side is present in the left side. Also, this is why the Area of a triangle is one-half the area of a square or rectangle.

Because a circle can be divided by a diameter line running side to side and by another diameter line running top to bottom, this forms the cross or what is called meridian and equator or solstice and equinox. This divides the circle into four squares with portions of each square falling outside the circle. Each square takes up one-fourth of the circle, plus some overhang. This also turns the two sides of each square that are inside the circle, into a radius each.

Formulas for the one-fourth square using the dimensions of the whole circle:
A “one-fourth square” is a square that represents one-fourth of the circle.

Perimeter = 4R (radius).
Area (units squared) = R * R.

Rectangles

Perimeter = Add all sides
Area (units squared) = Width times Height.

A rectangle or two triangles or sometimes two squares, takes up one-half the circle with some overhang.
Formulas for the one-half rectangle using the dimensions of the whole circle:
A “one-half rectangle” is a rectangle that represents one-half of the circle.

Perimeter = 6R (radius) OR 3D (diameter) OR 2D + 2R
Area (units squared) = R * D

Right Triangles

Perimeter = Add three sides. See explanation below when one of the three sides is unknown.
Area (units squared) = (Width * Height) / 2. Width is Base. Width and Height are the two shortest sides. Do not use the side labeled C which is the hypotenuse diagonal(1) which is the longest side.
As found out under “Squares” above, we again have our answer to the question: “Why is the area of a triangle half base times height?” This question is asking why do we take only half?
Answer: The formula for the area of a triangle is based on the formula for the area of a square or rectangle. Two triangles, one turned in the opposite direction, and joined side by side or bottom to bottom, will form either a square or a rectangle. Therefore, half the area of a square or rectangle equals the area of a triangle.

(1) Hypotenuse of a right triangle is the longest side, the longest diagonal. By drawing a vertical line off one end of this diagonal and then a horizontal line off the other end, you will be able to connect the two lines you just drew, to form either a rectangle or square. The hypotenuse is the diagonal that divides a rectangle or square into two right triangles.

In diagrams of right triangles, the hypotenuse diagonal is often labeled C, and sometimes H, but can also be labeled HD.
When unknown, the Hypotenuse is found using a^2 + b^2 = c^2. C^2 is then reduced to its Square Root to reach the final answer of c. (a^2 means “a” to the exponent of 2, thus “a” squared. “^” means exponent.
The Pythagorean Theory was known in Africa long before Pythagoras was born and long before Pythagoras went to Egypt to study for several years. As stated elsewhere, I don't think this lie was told by Pythagoras, instead it was likely the work of Americans searching in the dark for a basis to substantiate fakeness.

The right angle is the 90 degree angle. 90 degrees is known because a small square can be formed in that corner by drawing a small horizontal line and a small vertical line to connect the two lines. The corner of this small square points to the hypotenuse diagonal. The hypotenuse diagonal is always opposite the corner with the right angle. If a square cannot be formed in a corner, then only a small or large curved line should be drawn to connect the two lines. This means the angle is less than or greater than 90 degrees.

In corners with angles less than or greater than 90 degrees, you can draw a vertical line and horizontal line to connect the two lines; however, the resulting shape formed by the four lines will not be a square. 90 degrees is based on the square, thus 90 degrees is based on the circle.

If the hypotenuse is known along with one other side, then use c^2 - a^2 = b^2. Then take the square root of b^2. (Either of the two shortest sides can be a or b. It doesn't matter. Use this formula to find either one.)

Formulas for the one-fourth right triangle using the dimensions of the whole circle:
A “one-fourth right triangle” is a right triangle, that when doubled, forms a square and represents one-fourth of the circle. (There is a one-half right triangle, that when doubled, forms a rectangle and represents one-half of the circle. See rectangles above. Therefore a one-fourth right triangle automatically means based on the square based on one-fourth of the circle. A one-half right triangle means based on the rectangle based on one-half of the circle.)

Perimeter Method 1: 2R + SQRT(R^2+R^2). This is two times radius plus [square root of (radius squared plus radius squared.)] This formula is the same as the Nile Valley Theorem of a^2 + b^2 = c^2, except for two things: R is the radius (one half of a side) AND the result of the formula gives us C, not C^2. Thus, this is also the same formula as a + b + c = perimeter.

Perimeter Method 2: 2R+(R*SQRT(2)). This formula multiplies two sides of the triangle, then calculates and adds the third side as the hypotenuse.

Area = (R * R)/2.

The next message will explore how to calculate perimeter and area of squares, rectangles and right triangles using PI.
After that, it will take at least one to two more messages to complete our current quest into rethinking PI in relation to the circle, zero, squares, rectangles and triangles.

Kar, Kal, Akar & When Was Great Sphinx Built?Monumental Age Of EgyptUnity Consciousness #1515

.

(Part 9os of 11)

This is a continuation of the previous message which was more general in scope and is now moving towards the specific. This is in keeping with the process of creation.

Place - As A More Specific Location

Generally, Kar is the Universe as womb that provides the overall basis for orientation. By default of specification, specialization and speciation within the Universe, there are many more Kars. Some of these more specific Kars are galaxy, solar system, moon, sun and earth. (BB 494/506)

On Earth, a type of Kar is an underground cell or hole. This is also called a Kil (variation of Kal). (BB 389/401, 447/459)
It makes sense that an underground hole is also called a “well.” “Well” is a variation of Kal. What seems to be holding true is that often the letter “K” can becomes letter “W.” (BB 19/31)
“Well” is also a variation of Kar. Well is Werr is Kerr is Karr is Kar and also Kher.

At this stage in our journey through the spiritsphere, we automatically think in semblances and link “well” to abyss to womb, tomb, cocoon. We have used what we know generally and specifically to help us expand.

We are still mainly talking about Earth as a form of Kar and LoKal.
Generally speaking, underground holes are passages. They are hidden safe places where things can be stowed away.
Because Earth takes care of her own, Earth uses the underground to embalm and entomb that which is “on hold.”
In other words, a type of Kar is the underworld of Earth which is used as a sleeping chamber and transforming chamber for the mummy, the baby, the child, the elements and the elemental souls of life in both their general and more specific forms. For example, the human soul is a more specific form of the superhuman soul. (BB 416/428)

Two of the plural forms of Kar is Kars and Karti.
Karti also more specifically denotes underground holes, passages, and prisons where there are running waters, living waters, waters of Nun, waters of Womb, well waters, and so on. (BB 374/386)

A Small Sample Of Variations: Khar, Akar, Akhar, Kari (as in prokaryote, eurkaryote)
Another Small Sample Of Variations: kiln, locale, kali (this will likely lead to gave, have, kalu, khalu, khalil, kalli, kallu, calily callaloo, Gallu, Galla, Gullah and many more)

Because the topic of Kar & Kal is enormous*, we must consolidate and only mention or barely expound upon that already discussed elsewhere. We must move more swiftly towards topics we need right now, then come back as needed to explore others in greater detail. Along the way, we continue to gather understandings in our toolkit which we will need later. This is the same process all of us use our entire lives. We decide what we need and don't need right now. We work towards things we think we can use later. We decide what is important to our daily lives right now. What is “practical” is the term we use. We rarely consider the practically of gaining understandings in advance of need, even when those understandings don't immediately put money in our pockets, food on the table or keep the lights on.

Place - As A More Specific Location

Using what we learned in the previous message, we can say: above ground on Earth is Kar, while underground is Akar.
Kar as Earth is more specific than Universe. Akar is more specific than Earth.
We can also say Akar is the more general prepubescent form of the more specifically delineated, fully developed pubescent Amenta. Humans conceived Kar and Akar before they conceived Amenta. This shows the evolution of human thought. We can follow these thoughts through their stages and connect them to the Ages.

We will say this again another way. Humans were trying to understand their world, just as we still are. Through observation, investigation and experience, much earlier humans figured out water came from underground. Thus, by extension of understandings, they also figured other things that appeared and disappeared must also go underground. One of those things was the Sun that went below the horizon and seemed to go underground inside Earth.
This underground was called the Akar, the lower kar, the kar below, etc. Humans reasoned that Akar had to be a hollow-space that held water and also allowed the Sun to pass through a tunnel so it could emerge on the other side of the horizon.

One of the chief symbols of Akar was the Great Sphinx

The Great Sphinx presided over the mysteries of the birth of water, food and light – all of which emerged from underground. These types of understandings were so primary and so fundamental, this indicates the Great Sphinx was built prior to the eschatologically-based Amenta appearing in human thought and then appearing in the written thought of mythology as evidenced by the Periem-hru. The Great Sphinx was built and based on Akar first. Later on, this was expanded to include meanings associated with Amenta. Amenta is the later form of Akar which is the later form of Kar. (AE1 334-337/344-347)

The Great Sphinx was constructed to symbolize the Sun passing through Earth. Earth was conceived as being a mountain. Each night the Sun passed through the Mount of Earth or the Mound of Earth. Each day, the Sun passed over the mountain.
The Great Sphinx is a symbol of the Sun passing through the lower Kar in the north of water and darkness, and then emerging into the upper Kar south of air and light.
The Great Sphinx is also a symbol of Kal, as the Sun passed from the western side of the mountain to the eastern side of the mountain.
The Great Sphinx is primarily a symbol of Kar, Kal and Akar. These existed before Amenta, before Ptah became Father God revealed and before the Sun as God became chief timekeeper. Prior to this, the Moon was chief timekeeper. Thus the Great Sphinx was built before the Solar Age.

We already knew the Great Sphinx was built prior to the most recent Age of Aries, and prior to the most recent Age of Taurus and prior to the supposed reign of Narmer Mena Menes. We knew, at a minimum, that the Great Sphinx had to be constructed coincident with Leo on the horizon.****
What we now understand is that Leo is on the horizon twice per Great Year – once at Autumn Equinox in the west during the Age of Aquarius and once, at Spring Equinox in the east during the Age of Leo. The Great Sphinx is not tied to the most recent Age of Leo at Spring Equinox in 10920 BCE. Under no circumstances** was that when the Solar Age began or when Amenta was conceived or when the Lunar Age ended or when God, as male, superceded God as female. Therefore if the Solar Age began earlier, then the Great Sphinx must have been built earlier and Egypt must be much older.

We have taken the construction of the Great Sphinx from somewhere during the most recent Age of Aries, approximately 2240 BCE and moved it back to a more accurate time frame of at least 27938 BCE (25920 +2018)

The Great Sphinx was more likely constructed during the luni-solar transition when the Sun that previously passed through the mountain, then secondly passed through the cow of Mother Earth, was now being imaged as passing through the Great Sphinx. This was before Amenta because Akar was before Amenta.

So now we must add one more Great Year to our previous estimate. The Great Sphinx was constructed prior to 53858 BCE (27938 + 25920). this is well within the Stone Age culture that existed in Egypt at 73000 BCE.

An early name for the Great Sphinx is Akar.
The Great Sphinx was built for the god Har-Makhu, the Horus-sun that was immeasurably earlier than Ra. So are we to think Ra came into existence after 2200 BCE? And that the time from 2200 BCE to 332 BCE represents a time frame that can be called “immeasurably older?” It would be awfully strange for Ra to be created immeasurably later than 2200 BCE, and yet, there were temples to Ra prior to 2200 BCE.

Our study of Kar & Kar leads to Akar and the Great Sphinx via puzzle pieces we had, but had not yet linked in proper sync and sequence. It is in this learning space where our memories are being refashioned, that we understand the Age of the Great Sphinx is much older than thought and that there are, or were, at least two Great Sphinxes on this planet.
The Great Sphinx is a monument that was also built to commemorate the sacred place of creation, or, literally, “of the first time,” an Egyptian expression generally used for the creation or “in the beginning.” How could this have been during the most recent time when most people say the Great Sphinx was built? We are supposed to think Africans didn't figure this out until Africa and Egypt were on their way down and out of power and world imperialism.*** (AE1 302-3/312-13)

This message is specifically the third or fourth stage of several stages of our inquiry into the Age of the Great Sphinx. Even so, all messages contribute generally.
This message is also one of a huge number of stages into our inquiry of the Age of Egypt. So far, we can already understand Egypt is much older than we have been deceived to believe.
In the process of reconnecting to our full memory, once we better ascertain one piece of information as it pertains to the Great Year, mythology and evolution, then we can reorient ourselves in preparation for what is coming, that we are already in the midst of. Humans, in their African homeland, conceived, achieved, built, recorded, wrote much more at a much earlier period of time, than we have been fragmented to think is the whole total truth Since times are changing, rapid evidences of natural fact of this are coming out, and have been been, for at least 200 years. You can stay tuned to your daily news, but that is the last place the information will reach.

Notes:
*It's one thing to seek understandings about one aspect of a tree. It's another thing to seek understandings about the seed that produced the tree. It's another thing to seek understandings about the seed that produces all seeds. Kar & Kal are the Two Truths, the general two-part seed that produces all seeds. And this is why the topic is enormous. This is simply another route to helping us find our way back to unity as we continue to seek understandings about more specific things. The answers to all questions lead back to the seed of seeds, which as two truths, has many forms.

**The only circumstances that allow us to be so deceived is when logic is not verified. In our bodies, our cells verify the genetic instructions being used. Constant double-checking is taking place. The only time incorrect logic is not detected is when the context of the cell has been altered to allow incorrect to seem correct. This is due to the cell being hijacked from outside or too internally weak to perform its functions.
Our cells are at our mercy. If we fed our cells what is needed, then those cells, in their Akars, would incubate and integrate what we gave them to work with, and grow it into healthy fullness. All we need to do is feed our cells the bits and pieces of physical and mental nutrients and the cells will construct the rest. We supply the raw materials, the cells, via spirit-soul figures it out. This process is heightened when our cells are in the double Akar mode – the kar of our bodies and the kar of night when we are getting sufficient sleep. This is when the Sun renews itself, and by extension of the same soul of life in us, so do we. Continuous learning leads to breakthroughs and evolution, just as it did for early humans. It is inevitable that any creation will evolve and de-evolve in cycles. As many of us that free will our way towards truth, we are now in karevolutionary mode.

***When we limit the greatness of Egypt, Nile Valley, Africa and humans to the period of time when Egypt was into imperialism world domination empire building, then all of us are diminished and all the opulence of “stuff” is promoted as what makes humans great. Since the demise of Egypt, all of Asia and its offshoots, have been competing with the imperialism of Egypt. Secondly, unknown to most of us, Asia/Eurasia has also been competing on the intellectual and spiritual level, but have not been able to do so, and have only achieved momentary acclaim based on the crumbs and smidgens taken from Africa of what was achieved prior to the Nile Valley's Imperialistic Age. We know the tail does not wag the dog. Yet, the tail end of humans has tried to wag the dog of humans, but as usual, the absence of harmony is the fatal flaw.

****A monument aligned with a star or star constellation does not necessarily dictate when the monument was constructed. What is required however is a knowledge of the position of the star or star constellation and that it will return to that position. Thus what is required is a knowledge of the pattern of the Great Year. This knowledge requires at least three Great Years to develop, which is a period of 77,760 years. I suspect monuments were built just slightly in advance of the alignment. This then would allow the alignment to serve as verification and as a coronation celebration. (NG1 351/369)

References: BB; NG1; NG2; AE1; AE2

Egypt's Place In Time, Place, Space & MindMonumental Age Of EgyptUnity Consciousness #1512

.

(Part 9op of 11)

True to its name, Amenta is the hidden place of knowing. I am from Amenta and am coming out because Amenta is the womb. I am reborn there every so often. On Earth, if understandings seem out of reach, then in Amenta is where we should seek. Go back to this bosom of wisdom. Much activity is taking place in Amenta in preparation for “the big reveal” to those in the Earth of Time. Earth is experiencing labor pains and waters are breaking for a reason. Tempests are flaring and grounds are breaking for a reason. Temperature is rising for a reason.

Sacredness Of Great Year

Egyptian priests rectified all time just before the changeover to Greek and Roman rule in Egypt. They balanced the register. All basic cycles such as the Great Bear Constellation, the Circumpolar Constellations, the Zodiac Constellations, Sothis-Sirius-Dog star of Canis Major, Moon, Sun and other planets were combined into the Great Year. (AE2 742/206)

Therefore, we will use the Great Year and all symbolism as the basis and backdrop of reckoning. Time cycles above and symbolism below are connected and are jam-packed with natural fact that can no longer be hidden from the unwilling to be disabled.

This is just another step to ease us backwards and beyond to the future that has become our past. To help us realize the past was once our future. The future is behind us, the past is in front of us. We look back to the future to learn so we can create a different past as we move forward into that past. How quickly does tomorrow become today become yesterday. It's the same day in a different position in our perspective. The future becomes the present becomes the past. Thus the future is the past.

If we don't learn from futures that have already passed, then the future does not change. Futures just accumulate and assimilate into a larger mass of the same past.

We must reorient ourselves in place, space and time so we'll keep in mind what we're facing. The past is staring us in the face and the future's got our back.

The present is the pivotal position and stage, the vantage point. It's kinda difficult to learn from the future when the future is in front of us. So when we combine this with the “forget about the past” mindset and the “let's just move on from the past” mindset, then all that's left is the present, on an island, by its lonesome, with a status quo mindset that caused the disconnect in the first place.

Do you realize how much effort is dedicated to teaching people and kids about Egypt? What's being taught is misconception and deception. Why is that still going on as we speak? Because as Egypt in our mind goes, so goes all that flows through our minds about Africa. Thus so goes knowledge of self.

Egypt is Africa's child. Under no circumstances does any child jump up and give birth to itself, nurture itself and become great on its own through individual hard work. Where's Egypt's mommy and daddy? As it always is, Egypt's parent's are not two people or two places, it's the entire Nile Valley Village that raised Egypt on a 4,100 mile umbilical cord of understandings. And this is why, what we understand or misunderstand about the child has far-reaching implications, that affect the entire world's understanding about self and all else.

Egypt's Birth Year, Near 4400 BCE, Must Be Reconciled, With The Great Year

1. When we view Egypt from the perspective of beginning approximately 4400 BCE, give or take 1,000 years, we are viewing Egypt in its old age with left foot in the grave, on its way from being enslaver to enslaved. Prophetic justice.

2. It makes no sense for Egypt to begin 4400 BCE, and then instantaneously jump into writing, building houses, cities, monuments and doing all sorts of things. People who were previously prehistoric and proto-historic suddenly becoming historic in meteoric fashion....well,.... is nonsense.

3. It makes no sense for Egyptians to have no recorded history, then jump full force into recording history using linear writing.

4. It is not possible to know a Great Year exists until you have watched and recorded cycles of heaven for an entire Great Year of 25,920 years. So now immediately we must turn back the hands of time aligned to malign and misalign Egypt in the timeline of history. Egypt is at least 27,938 years old (25,920 + 2,018).

5. Since it takes three occurrences before pattern can be recognized, Egypt is at least 79,778 years old (3 x 25,920 + 2018). This assumes observations of heavenly cycles began the very first day they arrived in Egypt. This also accounts for Nubia since Egypt and Nubia-Kush-Aethiopia are one. Also, the area called Nubia was once part of Egypt and the other way around.

6. We are supposed to keep believing the Egyptians kept track of cycles of celestial bodies before they had a history and before they knew how to write. They must have done this while waiting for the great Eurasian pumpkin to arrive bearing gifts of superior intelligence.

7. Prior to 4400 BCE, the Sahara Desert was a full-fledged rainforest. Approximately 4400 BCE climate change began and by 1000 BCE there was no more rainforest. Do you know how huge the Sahara is? Imagine how much easier the living would have been which would have afforded people the opportunity to climb the hierarchy of needs and reach the pinnacle – spirituality expressed in all aspects of life. Under no circumstances did a people who were supposedly a beginner nation at 4400 BCE, climb from primitive in an unfavorable way to spiritual giants in 4,000 years during that last phase of Sahara drying up. (UC#1283)

8. It is not possible for an individual or a collective to evolve, when their best daily energy is applied to acquiring the most basic physical needs of basic needs. So when we account for this self-evident truth, how can a prehistoric people, who must provide for their basic needs, start from 4400 BCE and then a few thousand years later build the Great Pyramid and the Great Sphinx and the Labyrinth? Wow! They deserve the MVPPPPPH Award (most valuable people on the planet of pre, proto and post-history).

9. The metaphor has been given. If those neophyte Egyptians were able to achieve monuments of colossal size and perfection, while developing writing and developing mythology from scratch also, then the foundation of their existence must far exceed the finished product. UC#1508

10. Mdw Ntr (hieroglyphics) is writing. Whether you draw a picture of a bird or write the word bird, you have just done the same thing. Writing is art and art is writing. If writing using letters was evidence of superior intelligence then by now we should have figured out those primitive hieroglyphics drawn by the less intelligent, whose earlier form of writing we treat condescendingly akin to finger painting. We keep this perspective even as their hieroglyphics perplex us. Furthermore, the only reason we have some inkling about the hieroglyphics is because the Egyptians left us clues on how to decipher some of the hieroglyphics at the surface level. Linear writing using letters is a lesser way of knowing when understanding of the sign-language symbolism behind each letter is unknown. No! “A” is much more than apples you eat. “A” is the primary one, one, “I,” triangle, pyramid, apt, water, mother, child, fish, eagle, goose, ibis, head, duality, trinity and much more. Now how can that be when most of those words do not begin with the letter A? It's because the Egyptian Alphabet was well evolved prior to 4400 BCE. Find out when English became the claim of Europeans and you will find out when the Egyptian Alphabet was lowjacked. (NG1 45/63, 538/556)

11. The Egyptian Book of the Dead, which is a written document, is older than 4400 BCE. At 4400 BCE Egyptian mythology was in its final eschatology phase. Furthermore, the lunar and stellar mythology phases are indefinitely older than the monuments, which only cover the past three Ages (6,480 years – 2018 = 4462 BCE). (AE1 45/55)

12. Mount Sinai was part of Egypt from 5000 BCE to 11000 BCE. How did the Egyptians make it down and around or across the Red Sea to Mount Sinai but had no time to set up shop in Egypt until thousands of years later? (AE2 677/141)
They either got ahead of the future or we are behind the past.

We know something fishy is going on with the birthdate of Egypt when we look at the official histories of other nations. Go to their government website, and in most cases you will find dates related to their origins that exceed that of Egypt's, and in no fashion give any credit to any part of Africa for their existence. All of which seems to fly in the face of the human genome and evolution of cultures worldwide.

Narmer Mena Menes Deserves Special Attention

13. We are told the first King Pharaoh of Egypt is Narmer Mena Menes who obtained the throne via war and was the first to unite the two lands. What two lands? Egypt had supposedly just started. Did they start Egypt in both the Upper and Lower portions? What were they fighting with? Sticks and stones? What were they fighting for if they were virtually newcomer pioneers?

14. Narmer (Mena, Menes) was not the first ruler of Egypt. He may have been the first one called Pharaoh, but there were other Kings. We know by the simple fact that the Great Sphinx, which was built before Narmer took office, bears the face of the ruler during a time long before Narmer was born.

15. To repeat: Narmer (Mena, Menes) was not the first dynasty of Egypt. He may have been the first human dynasty, but there were many divine dynasties. But even as the first human dynasty he was still not among the first rulers who reigned, but possibly did not pass on rulership by birthright, or at least not by birthright obtained through war.

16. Using Namer Mena Menes as a basis for determining the Age of Egypt is like determining the Age of America by starting with Bill Clinton and Manhattan. 4400 BCE is barely a smidgen of the true Age of Egypt.

17. By the time we reach Narmer's rule as Pharaoh, Egypt had long since been perfected and was well into its declining phase. Egypt had already perfected its mythology through the stages of elemental, stellar, lunar, solar and eschatology. You don't do this without monitoring the stars, moons, planets and sun through their cycles. (BB 10/22), (NG1 4/22)

18. Anytime we start with a suboptimal context and stick with it, despite its warning signs, we are in nonsense no man's land, out of sorts in place, time and space. (BB 38/50)

19. The Egypt of the lists and dynasties beginning with Narmer Mena Menes is no time at all compared with the time demanded for the development of language, myths, hieroglyphics, astronomy, math, biology and knowledge of how to do anything such as build a monument, especially an enormous number of pyramids. Pyramids had become so common, every ruler was building multiple ones. And let us not forget the temples, especially Waset (Luxor & Karnak).

20. To date the Age of Egypt at 4400 BCE is like using one day as the timeframe for what takes ten years to accomplish. Monuments are a lesser form of evidence when they become the only way of knowing. It's like asking rocks to fall on us.

21. We are getting warmer by being the informers instead of the conformers, the farther and further we push back from Narmer. No monument associated with Pharaoh Mena has ever been found. Nothing is inscribed with his name. Nothing is known to have been made in the time of Mena, yet he supposedly built Memphis.
In Egypt the only fixed or definite era was astronomical. In other words, periods of time were not evidenced by what was found below, it was based on what is found above. Prior to the period identified with Mena of 4400 BCE, the Egyptians kept track of vast lengths of time as “ reigns ” of sacred monarchs without human name, because these humans were representative of the divinities. Before that was the “direct dominion” of the gods [which seems to indicate a lesser form of human rule or no human rule in the beginning stages of Egypt]
To repeat: Heaven south and north is the mirror; Earth is the reflection. Then Earth becomes the mirror and humans the reflection. Then humans become the mirror and what humans produce becomes the reflection. Thus the chain of events of causes and effects tells us that what humans produce is a reflection of the Heavens. So in the absence of knowing through one method on Earth, the signs and symbols of heavens are always there and cannot be altered by humans. Humans have tampered with dates and other information but they can't change the time cycles of heavens and its symbols and neither did they change the symbols reflected through humans during those time periods. Therefore we have the fundamental key to unlocking the kingdom of knowledge.

This is another reminder of what we already know: the best lies contain the most truth.
Thus, by default, the best lies contain the basis to expose those lies. Study lies. Make sure you use a different context worldview than the one that produces the lie. Then you will understand that the lie “tells on itself.” In other words, in order to expose lies produced via the European worldview, you must use the African Utamawazo's Optimal Theory. (BB 38-9/50-1)

George Massey states it clearly:

”The truth is that a great deal of history and mythology have to change places with each other; the history has to be resolved into myth, whilst the myths will be found to contain the only history. The ancient fables were veiled facts, and when we can get no further records on the earth, it is in the heavens we must seek for the Egyptian chronology. It is the astronomical mythology solely that will reveal to us what the Egyptians and other nations meant by dynasties of deities and the development of series and succession in their rule.” (BB 40/52)

Moving On From Narmer

22. Time to relearn to read what we write so we can rewrite what we read. Much mention has been made regarding false notions associated with the way humans view human intelligence in relation to other creations, and in the way humans view intelligence among human groups. Thinking, by man or animal, does not depend on speech or writing. At least, not the kind of speech humans can hear. And at least not the kind of writing humans use. The foundation of thought is the ability to reflect upon images of nature as they really are. In other words, the foundation of thought is the ability to understand what is happening and what you are experiencing. The use of words does not guarantee complete thinking is taking place, unless those words connect the user of the words to sign-language images of nature. Clearly, if the ability to think required words, then humans, starting out with no words, would never be able to think, in order to create words. Hieroglyphics are images of highly concentrated thought such that each symbol has the potential to have many meanings. There are at least 1,000 picture words in Egyptian hieroglyphics, and only 26 letters in the Englicized version of the alphabet. This means the meanings of the 1,000 are condensed into the 26. And this is why a picture is worth a thousand words and why a Great Year of 25,920 is also almost (26 letters x 1,000 pictures = 26,000). In other words, the big picture is the Great Year.
I suspect this also indicates the total number of meanings available when we combine non-linear thinking with linear thinking. Since we don't know much about any of this or use much of this approach, then we are missing a lot of meaning, thus understandings, even though we know how to read and write. (AE1 40-1/50-1, 44/54)

23. The Stone Age existed at least by 73000 BCE. In Egypt there are visible signs of the existence of a stone age culture. The Stone Age did not begin in Egypt in 4400 BCE when supposedly monuments began. Egypt is at least 75,018 years old (BB 7-11/19-23)

Go Jigger

24. To believe Egypt began around 4400 BCE is like believing an old woman can have hundreds of children while at the same time create what baffles the mind in all subject areas and that the combined efforts of all today's nations cannot duplicate.

25. To believe the significance of Egypt began around 4400 BCE is to believe God created everything in the universe in six days or six thousand years and that two Eve-like and Adam-like people came straight from God as homo sapiens and hit the ground running so all they had to do was name animals using words they somehow knew and use speech they somehow knew to communicate with each other, God, and serpents. And then since everything they needed was available, all they had to do was just start having babies. Supposedly those first two humans and everything else were fully evolved pretty early in the process. (Let's be clear, if God gave them those mature abilities, then why not give the mature ability to critically think before they flunked the first test they faced? Because it didn't happen that way and neither did a lot of things about the history of Egypt happen the way we are being told.)

26. In order to trace evolution and development of a person, place or thing, you have to go beyond the truncated thought processes we use today. We must go deeper than the finished product we see and don't see. Carbon dating and radio isotopes and whatever those dating methods are called is one way of knowing, but yet, there are other ways. Every piece of information is a clue to the jigsaw puzzle, that has temporarily been gerryrigged. And now the jig is up.

27. How is it that prior to 4400 BCE, shipbuilding was taking place in Egypt? (BB 23/35)

Can You Feel The Rebirth Of Truth?

28. If the mind-blowing nature of Egypt's massive multi-disciplinary accomplishments (not just stone buildings), in relatively “no time at all,” ranging from 4400 BCE to 332 BCE, seems to be the whole truth, then what Egypt accomplished before that time will indeed make your head implode. And you will ask rocks to fall on you.
This must be so because by default, we are utterly amazed by the last little bit of Egypt's achievements when they were intellectually “in their rocking chair years.” They were chilling, cruising and coasting downhill, and thus, seemingly unimpeded, they forgot to use the brakes and ran right into, serpents who knew the secrets to their gardens.

29. We know a lot of the story about Egypt is missing because, “Where is the Great Mother?” No human and no country can begin to begin without mama. When we encounter Egypt at 4400 BCE, Egypt is in Father First-mode and masculine mode.

30. At the time of 4400 BCE, Egypt has been in the Amenta stage of its life since 11000 BCE. Thus so has the rest of the world been in an underworld state of existence, even as empire building became the main thing and began changing hands. The world is not in Amenta mode because of Egypt, but because the Great Year cycle of energy is in Amenta mode. The Great Year has been reformulating the Great Mother. The Great Mother is the Manes in Amenta whose spirit-soul is phoenix rising in many forms. (BB 13-14/25-26) (BB 7-11/19-23)

Until such time as our memory is fully restored, consciousness unified and the circle of logic is no longer broken, we must continue to do one or two things and both. (1) Use what is below and reconcile it with that which is above. (2) The other way around.

References: BB; NG1; NG2; AE1; AE2

Baptizing Adult Viewpoints Into A Baby's WorldviewThird Creation – Order Of CreationUnity Consciousness #1428

.

(Part 9lm of 11)

Closing One Chapter, Opening Another

Baptism, as practiced by humans, is supposed to do the same thing as baptisms taking place throughout the other 99.999999% of nature. The human practice of baptism is supposed to restore logic like a fountain of youth. It is supposed to make logic young again like a baby who has no preconceived notions that favor one truth over the other. The baby doesn't give a shit about your suboptimal identifiers as long as you are healthy in spirit, thus logic. Baptism is supposed to renew our thirst for learning, questioning and analyzing everything we encounter so we can learn more about ourselves. This is what babies do which is a good approach that gets waylayed and kicked to the wayside by teachers in the child's life.

Despite the need for baptism to keep us childlike in our quest for understandings, baptism of a child is a misapplication of baptism, if a child being baptized is for the purpose of cleansing the child's soul from sin and ensuring the child makes it to heaven via church membership. This practice is doublespeak redundant in a bad way. It reinforces ignorance and makes us vulnerable to more malfunctions of logic, customs, traditions, and cultures that are runaway childs running wild, terrorizing souls.
A newborn child is brand new out of the waters of the mother. The souls of life in the child are rainbow fresh out of the Pool of Two Truths. The gift just arrived. The child's database is a new computer born with correct logic from heaven. There is no need for Karrekh-tion. or kherrekh-tion by putting the child through a baptism or christening ceremony. The soul just came out of the sacred holy of holies spirit world of heaven. What is more divine than deliverance?
For children, the only baptism and christening needed is continuous soul-nourishing instruction in the two truths to protect the soul of the child from core disruption (“corruption” from the well-intentioned miseducated).

When we humans say a child needs to be baptized, and then we also install corrupt logic into the child after an unnecessary baptism, we have adulterated the soul purpose of baptism twice. The second adulteration being the worse because it is ongoing, just like the second death.

More Don'ts and Dos

You don't have to die physically to be baptized in the Pool of Two Truths.
You do need continuous balanced nutrition so old logic can die and be reborn transformed.

You don't have to be physically circumcised.
You do have to cut away logic that has you in feel good bondage, but is not liberating your soul.

You don't have to be baptized by a human in order to be baptized in the Pool of Two Truths.

You do have to immerse your thinking in two truth logic.
“That's all folks,” says the rabbi.t.

Copyright 1995-2018 Ancestors through Usekhu. All Rights Reserved.

Second Creation – 6 Ways To Be Born & To DieOrder Of CreationUnity Consciousness #1387

.

(Part 9jy of 11)

We are revisiting the elementals and continuing thoughts we've crisscrossed in UC #1364. We already know there must be at least two creations: one based on a celestial creation of the Universe and one based on the terrestrial creation of this planetstar called Earth.
We can say this another way. For the elemental souls of life, there is a celestial creation, a terrestrial creation and a subterranean creation. We could call these future, present and past or before life, life and afterlife. For now it is enough to simply expand from where we are so we can integrate more and consolidate, conclude, decide more optimally.

What we basically just said is that everything has a collective creation and an individual creation. We know this because of the many metaphors that show how one becomes many becomes one. We are learning to reconceptualize the One as also being the Zero. In Zeroness Oneness, all forms of birth are understood to be one and the same on many different planes. Since we know transformation and transition exist on either side of birth, then we also know so also does death. Therefore, that which we reckon as ways to be born, become in another form, the ways to die.
So what is taking place in the human understanding of these things is the explanation of Creation, based on one plane primarily, while mixing in portions from other planes (dimensions). We are doing this without awareness of the layers of Creation that make up the Creation Story. What is most common in human ideology is the mixing of the Universal creation with the much later Planetstar Earth Creation. It's still all good as long as it's still understood. Why? Because, as of Universe, so of Earth.

Six Ways Souls Of Life Are Born/Die, Reborn/Redie, Born Again/Die Again

1. Universal-Formed: Out of Khekh in Zero One Circle of Waters. These creations begin with Khekh.

2. Universal-Born Upper Circle: Out of Spirit-Soul combo of the Two Circles. This circle could possibly produce the upper heaven of constellations, the circumpolar, thus the Greater Great Year. It could produce that which relates to the polar, solstice meridian. Also called Khekh1, Nnun. Also called Heaven-Born, Heaven-Sent, Celestial when no distinction is necessary or understood. Creations at this level begin with Waters (plural).

3. Universal-Born Again Lower Circle: Out of Spirit-Soul combo of the Two Circles. This circle could possibly produce the lower heaven of constellations, those of the equinox and zodiac, thus the Lesser Great Year. It could produce that which relates to the equator, equinox, horizon, solar and Earth. Also called Khekh2, Nnut. Also called Heaven-Born, Heaven-Sent, Celestial when no distinction is necessary or understood. Creations at this level begin with Darkness and Lightness as co-reproducers (parents) of souls of life. (NG1 341/359, 476/494)

4. Planetstar Earth-Reborn. Out of Waters of Earth's Abyss Cytoplasm Nucleus. Also called Earth-Born, Terrestrial. Creations at this level begin with Water (singular).

5. Hesmen and Semen. Out of species born on Earth. Creations at this level begin with the merging of pubescent feminine and pubescent masculine water of reproduction.

6. Amenta-Annu Resurrected: Out of Waters of subterranean Nnut (the sky beneath Earth in the Earth of Eternity). These creations begin with one-half of contrast duality that is considered immortal which then merges with the other half of contrast duality considered mortal. This is the holy kiss of life that merges with the holy kiss of death and allows resurrection to take place. (NG1 471/489)

We are moving towards identifying even more ways souls of life are born. During this process we are also gaining understanding that helps us again become more flexible in switching between expanding logic and consolidating logic, so that the byproduct becomes reworked thinking and behavior. In the short-term we are seeking to recognize the Universal-born logic and Earth-born logic that dominates our worldview context utamawazo. We seek to reconcile our understandings through continuous birth and death before we are born into the second death.

Conceptualize Our Lives

We can conceptualize the lives (birth-death) described above in many ways. A few that help me are:
1. From the universal one circle, spirit-soul motion makes at least one complete loop, then drops halfway down within itself and makes another loop forming the second circle. Each loop overlaps, thus forming a linked chain. As motion continues to go through circles and cycles of birth-death, more circles of creation are formed-transformed. This continues forming a long chain that itself is moving in space like a snake. Eventually each end of this snake connects to complete the circle. We've seen images of serpents formed in a circle or with their tails in their mouths indicating unending continuity of life (birth-death) transitions.

2. The view from below is as a seed or egg that grows and multiplies like cell division, forming more complex or, at least, more intricately connected organisms. This growth moves through many layers and recreates itself in many ways. This process forms a lifeline vine that moves, branches, entwines, climbs and finds it way back to itself in more places than one, including back to the source of the seed at both ends that connects heaven and earth. This makes as one, the final mortal death and initial immortal birth.

Copyright 1995-2018 Ancestors through Usekhu. All Rights Reserved.

Algebra Review Double-Checking Equality Inequality(Part 4 of 5 Continued) - Phase OneUnity Consciousness #1342

.

(Part 9if of 11)

This message is best understood by first reading “Algebra, Subtraction-Addition, Equality-Inequality: 4 of 5”

1. In the previous message, 7 + 5 does equal 12. We simply expanded the understandings to show what took place before, during and after so we can gain fuller understandings of the purpose of mathematics-arithmetic. Here are all the numbers and operators involved:
a) 7 + 5 = _____, the initial equation, which we determined to be an inequality.
b) 7 = 1, the pre-initial inequality that is not given using the Current Method of teaching math. The previous message provides the underlying context to recognize this inequality exists.
c) 7, the initial amount on the left side because it comes before the operator plus sign.
d) 5, the amount being added to the left side. 5 is the adjustment.
e) = shows we are trying to create equality or maintain equality.
f) -5, the amount being subtracted from the right side. Since +5 took place on the left side, that means 5 of something was being added to the left side, thus 5 must be also be adjusted from the right side because we started with an inequality. -5 is the adjustment. This amount was inferred because it is not given to us using the Current Method of teaching.
g) “x” is the unknown on the right side.
h) 12, the initial answer to “x”
i) 17, the initial amount on the right side. Determined by the Ancient Method of teaching math.
j) 24, the total amount of the whole, 7 = 17 initially as an inequality, then 12 = 12 after creating an equality.
k) 10, the difference between 7 on the left and 17 on the right. This difference was split into 5 and 5 by subtracting 5 from the right and adding 5 to the left. (This is why + 5 is shown. Unfortunately -5 is omitted in the Current Method).
l) RULE: The total difference in two sides of an inequality is two times the amount being added to or subtracted from one side. We add this total difference to the side the adjustment is being made to in order to the determine the pre-initial amount on the other side. OR We subtract the difference on the side being subtracted from. [which one is used depends on which one is known in the initial equation]
Applying The Rule:
7 + 5 = _____, means 5 is being added, thus the difference is 2 x 5=10.
We add 7 and 10 to get 17 on the right side
The pre-initial inequality is 7 = 17
We must know these things in order to solve the equation properly. In other words, we must know these things in order to manipulate resources to create the desired effect - to create equality or inequality.

2. Double-Checking Using 7 = x + 3: Current New School Method:
a) 7 = x + 3
b) 7 - 3 = x + 3 – 3
c) 4 = x (final answer)
d) Now we substitute to double-check:
e) 7 = x + 3
f) 7 = 4 + 3
g) 7 = 7 (not considered part of the answer)
h) This method does not provide any understandings, just how to manipulate numbers.

3. Double-Checking Using 7 = x + 3: Ancient Old School Method:
a) Continuous training in knowledge of self in relation to all else.
Includes but not limited to contextual knowledge of the whole, equations, equality, inequality, balance, imbalance, purpose of maintaining, cause and effect)
Presupposition: We live in a universe that is the whole. Everything taking place within this whole must balance itself out. Every action must and does have a corresponding opposite reaction. This is called a reciprocal relationship. Therefore, when you see a change in anything, try to understand what the corresponding change(s) are taking place. This will bring fullness of understanding due to understanding the whole nature of change. In terms of math equations, each equation must be formatted to reflect changes being made are taken into account on both sides.
Incorrect format: 7=x+3. Correct format: 7-3=x+3.
Incorrect answer: 4. Correct answer: 1. This is still not the complete answer solution.
b) Pre-analysis must be performed and continuing re-analysis:
We can see 3 is the adjustment on the right, therefore 2 x 3 = 6 is the difference between the two sides.
Since 3 is on the side being added to, and we don't know “x,” we subtract the difference from the left side.
7 – 6 = 1. This is the initial amount on the right side. (we already know the amount on the left side is 7)
The pre-initial inequality is 7 = 1. This is what exists before making the adjustment of +3
The whole total is 8 ( 7 + 1), which again shows us the difference of 6.

c) Determine type and amount of adjustment.
Since this is an inequality, the opposite adjustment must be made to both sides.
We already know the adjustment is shown as + 3 on the right side, thus must be -3 on the left side, if we want to create equality.
d) We can now see the steps that lead to the final equation:
7 = x + 3, initial equation (inequality) transforms into
7 = 1, pre-initial equation (inequality) transforms into
7 - x = 1 + x , final equation (equality) (notice how different this is from 7 = x + 3)
Intuitively we already know the answer must be 4 = 4, because that's the only way to divide 8 equally when there are only two sides. Therefore, once we determine the whole total during pre-analysis, all we have to do is divide it by two.
e) Solve the final equation:
7 - x = 1 + x
7 – x + x = 1 + x + x
7 = 1 + 2x
7 - 1 = 1 + 2x -1
6= 2x
3 = x (this is how you calculate the adjustment using the long way or for more complex problems)
f) Now make substitutions to verify the adjustment creates equality:
7 – x = 1 + x
7 – 3 = 1 + 3
4 = 4 (this is still an intermediate answer)
g) The lesson is not done until more answers come from additional understandings:
The whole total went from 7 = 1 to 4 = 4, both still 8
Notice how in the Current Method, the final equality is 7 = 7 for a total of 14, but in the Ancient Method, the final equality is 4 = 4 for a total of 8. This is explained in the next section.
Use the initial equation provided by the Current Method, to determine the pre-initial equation of the Ancient Method.
Then use the pre-initial equation, along with other information from pre-analysis, to form the final equation. Thus we have transformed the Current Method into the Ancient Method, mainly through analysis informed by the optimal theory of the African Utamawazo.
Using the Ancient Method we went from inequality as the solution, to inequality as the pre-existing condition to equality as the solution.
Using the Current Method we went from inequality as the solution to inequality in a different form as the solution.
As the Current Method shows, it is possible to equate something, and do so unequally, and conclude you did so equally and have the numbers to prove it.
The main point of math problems is not to just simply add, subtract, multiply and divide numbers. More importantly the point is to recognize the difference between what an equality is and what an inequality is and then understand how to manipulate transform them or maintain them. Doing all of this in relation to self in relation to all else. Additional understandings are listed throughout Parts 1-5 of this series.

4. Slickery Trickery Method:
a) Another name for the Current Method.
b) Current Method overstates totals. In the example above, the total is overstated by 6
Using Current Method: final equality is 7 = 7, thus whole total is 14
No way of double-checking, what we end up with because what we start with is not considered.
We are told you start out with an equality where things are balanced on both sides, then you add 3 to one side and end up with an equality.
Using Ancient Method: final equality is 4 = 4 , thus whole total is 8 after equality created.
This is proven by double-checking against the pre-initial inequality of 7 = 1, thus the total is also 8 before equality created.

c) A series of mistakes when using the Current Method:
The context is suboptimal.
The upfront assumption that the equation presented is an equality is faulty – even though it returns an answer that makes the equation appear equal.
This is only possible by ignoring or hiding the whole total we started with. Then using the difference to falsely inflate both sides, thus also falsely inflate the whole total.
We are not alerted to the fact that the equation, as stated, is an inequality, therefore x + 3 does not equal 7. It can't. It can only equal 7 by virtue of the adjustment of +3. When and where did the adjustment of -3 take place? Furthermore, x cannot equal 7, because if it did, the equation would start out as 7=7 and end up as 4=10, none of which makes sense, especially when only a +3 is introduced.
You cannot put half of an adjustment in an equation to achieve equality.
No, and neither can you fix it by making the other half of the adjustment during solving the problem in order to maintain balance throughout the process and reach true equality. This is why analysis, as a daily part of life and existence, must be ongoing. And it is, we just make poor use of it.
Both parts of the adjustment must be reflected in the initial equation as shown by the Ancient Method.
In the Current Method, we are not taught that +3 means an adjustment is being made
We are not taught +3 is only half of the adjustment.
We think 4 is the answer that represents what x was initially
Instead, 4 represents what x is AFTER adding 3 to it. (therefore x is 1 initially as shown by the Ancient Method)
d) Reconciling the two methods:
The difference between the totals using two methods represents “the difference” of 6 we calculated in the Ancient Method.
In the Current Method, due to a series of logic error mistakes, we ended up falsely inflating the total from 8 to 14 by adding the difference of 6 to the total rather than splitting the difference and redistributing it.
Also, even more sinister, this error also transforms both sides as follows:
Left side: 7 plus the 3 that wasn't finally subtracted = 10 on the left side.
Right side: 7 minus the 3 that wasn't an initial part of “x”. This is not the same as the separate +3 shown as the adjustment. This gives us 4 on the right side.
Thus the final equation using the Current Method of logic is to create an inequality of 10 = 4 which is the same as the initial inequality of 7 = 1. Both show a difference of 6 between the two sides.
Using the Current Method, we are led to think the two sides are 7 = 7, but they are actually 10 = 4. The Ancient Method reveals the shenanigans. Ashe! Asante Sana.
The Current Method is the kind of math arithmetic that quantifies the national debt/deficit that keeps rising giving us a false impression of prosperity and why we think our quality of life has improved, because our income rises based on the numbers. All false. We can't know how quality has changed without qualitative understanding achieved via sufficient analysis of the before, during and after effects of change.
e) Adding to the whole total can only take place out of Preexistence Waters of Nun due to expansion. All other additions to other dimensions must be subtracted from somewhere else in this universe, usually from the closest dimensions to us.
f) To briefly summarize a few points I find interesting:
The Current Method of teaching us how to manipulate numbers inflates the whole total, inflates both sides, does not help you understand whether or not equality was actually achieved, instead numbers are used to tell you equality has been achieved or decreased.
Using the Current Method, understanding is lost and glossed – over.
When you don't do opposite things to both sides of an inequality and you misstate and inflate the total, the net effect is more inequality, of course.
The equation for equality (the process to achieve it) must be setup in the proper format in order to achieve equality. This must be checked and rechecked continuously, before, during and after the fact.
Current thinking and behavior among the masses has been calibrated to equate things unequally, and conclude it was done equally based on numbers and other information improperly arrived at and used.
The Current Method admits you must do the same thing to both sides of an equality. It fails to do so in the setup of the problem, thus false equality is achieved.
The Current Method also admits you must perform the opposite operation to remove a number or variable from one side of an equation. Then carry that same adjustment to the other side. Yet when the initial problem is not setup properly, the discrepancy between the two sides that existed, gets hidden.
The Current Method teaches that an “equation” means you're always dealing with an equality. Instead “equation” means you are equating two things, comparing them. An equation can also be an inequality. What determines whether or not it is an equality is the preexisting difference, the adjustments being made and the difference after the adjustments.
The Ancient Method shows us the solution to a problem is always a multi-part solution. No problem can be solved without analysis. And no existing state of equality or inequality can be maintained without ongoing analysis that changes the form of the equality or inequality according to the current set of conditions.

Copyright 1995-2018 Ancestors through Usekhu. All Rights Reserved.

Wholeness Ratio & Number Definitions: 3 of 5 PartsPhase OneUnity Consciousness #1340

.

(Part 9id of 11)

Conceptual Intro

We continue to move away from the numbed-down view of mathematics and re-expand it to a fuller range of vibrations and applications of the whole universe (science, nature, the total self...).
Each of us are whole parts (fractions...) seeking wholeness, seeking to unite, combine, connect and identify with greater and greater wholes.
Since we, as one of many, are in a reciprocal relationship, this means the whole is also seeking its parts, to unify consciousness and reconcile all conundrums, contradictions, confusions, incongruencies and prodigal notions.

call IT what you want

Whoever or Whatever the Ultimate Authority is, spirIT is seeking wholeness even as we are seeking wholeness. This is why it is said if we take x number of steps, the One will take x number of steps towards us. We are seeking wholeness in many ways and the Ultimate Authority is also seeking wholeness in many ways.
The Ultimate Authority is seeking all of its parts in all forms so we all may be reconciled within the whole.

Definitions

“Whole number” means much more than “a number without a fraction or decimal, blah, blah, blah.” We've already remembered a whole number is a fraction. We also know whole numbers contain a decimal. 1 is 1.0, but the 0 is not written, thus neither is the decimal.

A whole number is any number in any form,

If this is not true, then none of us are whole or can be whole because we are all, each and every one of us, parts of the whole. Don't we already know this? If this is not true, then subtotals cannot be whole numbers, because they are not the whole total.
Are you telling me identical twins are wholes, yet each is 1 /2 of a set, thus neither is the total, thus neither is the whole? Huh? This is what happens when we double-check our math against biology, zoology, anthropology, religion, archaeology, culture, music, legal laws and any other topic that exists. We find inconsistencies. And this is what we must do with all of our logic – compare it to more of all else that exists. If it doesn't quite fit, then neither will our behavior fit in this whole relationship we are in, thus wholeness will remain elusive because our behavior/thinking is not conducive to wholeness. It is illusive.

Back To The Legal Scene Of Many Legal Crimes

In schools worldwide, due to the currently taught definition of whole numbers, the only thing that can be a whole number is the whole.
Based on the currently taught daffynition, the number 1 cannot be a whole number because it is not the starting point, thus it cannot be the whole. Therefore, the only whole number is Zero.
Now we've come to the convergence/divergence point of the suboptimal context and optimal context. Zero is the beginning, thus is the Whole Number of Whole Numbers.

Many messages relating to zero explain why zero is the whole, the circle, the universe, the basis, the denominator and the enumerator of anything and everything that exists, the totality.

Wholeness Ratio

The wholeness ratio is a single expression where:
All numbers in the universe are displayed as a single numerator, and then on the bottom of this single expression, zero is the denominator.
Thus we have zero as the numerator, but it is displayed in the form of many.
Thus we have many as the denominator, but they are displayed in the form of zero.

What connects the “many” in the numerator are all the “operators” used in mathematics.
What connects the numerator and denominator is the dividing line of dimensions.

The more the combination of all our understandings approach the wholeness of the wholeness ratio, the more we become optimally whole.

---

Before we walk away and go on with the busyness of the day, hopefully we will takeaway the renewed understanding that whole numbers and wholeness are based on zero, beginning, origin, circle, universal. This must be so:
1. if math is to not be as disconnectedly confusing as currently taught.
2. if life and existence is to not be as disproportionately confusing as currently taught at home.

Copyright 1995-2018 Ancestors through Usekhu. All Rights Reserved.

Whole Numbers & Fractions: 1 of 5 PartsPhase OneUnity Consciousness #1338

.

(Part 9ib of 11)

In this five-part message we deep breathe fresh air and simultaneously remember basics of how to add, subtract, divide, multiply, cross multiply and reciprocate in a more optimal context.

Intro

Whole numbers are fractions are whole numbers.
A fraction shows the relationship of something in relation to the whole.
Therefore, a fraction shows the relationship of self in relation to all else. Thus we have one/many.
A fraction shows the relationship of that One Something that is Everything in relation to all Else which is Everything. Thus we have everything/everything.

Deep breathing initiates are carefully seeking and will notice that everything/everything is the same as everything is everything which is the same as everything equals everything.
Then we can also keep moving backwards to catch up to ourselves and see that one/many is the same as one is many which is the same as one equals many.

We already know this simply because we are nothing but a bunch of cells that started out as one cell.
Furthermore we also know each of us represent one person, yet are made of many parts. Thus we are both:
a “whole in person” and
a “person in fractions.”

For example let's say we are made of 10 parts. We are 10/10=1, plus we are also 1/10 ten times. This will become even clearer by the end of the fifth part.

It is well known within us that one is many is one.
We say the same thing in our spiritual-religious ideologies: one became many.
Despite how it's explained, the biological-physical and the spiritual-religious are fundamentally the same. Creation of the Universe and creation of us begin as: Oneness is twoness is oneness. (as shown by union of egg and sperm) and (as shown by the universe's differentiation into double 0, then into 0 and 1).
This means binary code is not just for computers, it is also biological-physical-spiritual-religious and much much more, way long before recent human-made versions of computers.
I'll say it another way: the backbone of your computerized device uses the same basis that formed you and formed the universe and forms all spiritual-religious ideologies. Fractions and wholes are a dynamic duo who are different, yet the same.

Note regarding: “A fraction shows the relationship of something in relation to the whole.”
1. “Something” is the numerator. “The whole” is the denominator.
2. This is why many/one means many denominated as one.
3. This is why one/many means one denominated as many.
4. And this is why the two are reciprocals and balance each other out and provide full circle perspective.
5. In the first instance, the whole is the one and in the second instance, the whole is the many.
6. This is also to say, that both many and one are the whole and the part, both the whole number and the fraction.

Copyright 1995-2018 Ancestors through Usekhu. All Rights Reserved.

Recall, Teach, Prophesize: Status Quo, Violence, RevolutionPhase OneUnity Consciousness #1322

.

(Part 9hl of 11)

One of the main reasons the current power structures exist in societies is because they are violent. They came into power via violence and hold on to power via violence. This includes their legal laws and the administration, enforcement and adjudication of those legalized rules. Most of this entire process is violence. Innerstand what violence is. We already know violence is also mental, emotional and physical. We also know even physical violence is not limited to obvious physical violence but also takes the form of small damages that accumulate slowly.

Now who among us, in any of these societies we are in, can say our society is not filled with violence on all levels? Name that non-violent place in your society.

Violence Is Part Of Revolution

Climate change is good violence revolution, yet we understand it not. Climate change of the superhuman is helping bring about revolution in the human circle. Ma and Pa will continue to show us how.**

Malcolm X reminds us there is no such thing as a non-violent revolution.
Don't for a minute think, what is taking place in America, as spotty moments of showmanship against racism, is what it's going to take to divest the devil of his crown.

Have you not heard: power concedes nothing without a struggle, i.e., power ain't giving up the keys until power bleeds sufficiently. This is verified by history.

Frederick Douglass recalls, teaches and prophesizes: “This struggle may be a moral one, or it may be a physical one, and it may be both moral and physical, but it must be a struggle. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will.”
I say, where in history has fundamental change of power taken place via a moral demand?

Show me once where people knocked on the door of another people and said, um, excuse me, we come in peace and it's our turn, so please hand over the keys and move over and out of the way, thank you for your cooperation? Oh, and by the way, if you don't cooperate, we will have discussions with you, negotiate and protest until you give up, or at least break us off a shape-shifted crumbling piece of what you possess as thief so we can misperceive progress and relief as we kneel at your feet while you placate us with apologies and gumdrops until we are no longer a threat and our awareness of the no level of goodness in your heart, we have completely forgot..

Malcolm X Recalls, Teaches, Prophesizes

1. “Any movement of freedom and power that is dependent upon the oppressors support for its survival is doomed to failure.”

2. "A race of people is like an individual man; until it uses its own talent, takes pride in its own history, expresses its own culture [and] affirms its own selfhood, it can never fulfill itself."

3. "Of all our studies, [human] history is best qualified to reward our research."

4. As part of the Reality Speech, Malcolm X told us you have to do more than be at the table to be an American or to be a citizen. [With that being said, the goal must not be to be included as part of current societies, the disenfranchised already are, that's the problem.]

5. In his speech, “There's No Such Thing as a Non-violent Revolution,” he said “Revolution is based on land. Land is the basis of all independence. Land is the basis of freedom, justice and equality.”

6. We must Sankofa. As Malcolm X said, “Why, you left your mind in Africa.” This is true for every person who has ever been born on the planet. It is very stupid and self-hating to not honor the fullness of your heritage.

7. “Who Taught You To Hate Yourself” (5 minute video)

David DeBerry recalls, teaches, prophesizes: “If Blacks, in their pursuit of drastic change had studied history, analyzed the reality of the situation and/or developed teaching and organizing styles of leadership, mistakes and non-achievement in regards to power sought could have been avoided.”

What we are seeing in the world is mental illness and violence that started in Africa that spread from the birthplace and then back to the birthplace. This was the first cycle circle. Then, in another cycle, another Age, mental illness and violence spread to Asia. Then in another cycle, another Age, the next generation of worsening mental illness and violence matured in Asia and spread across the planet. Africa is in no ways innocent. Their erosion of thinking contributed to their demise. And now here we are in this cycle where the corrosion of thinking is contributing to a much faster demise of societies.
We are living in societies whose very basis is mental illness and violence that is considered acceptable behavior because it is defined by the suboptimal context. Whatever threatens the suboptimal context is considered unacceptable, violent and mental illness. If you're sick you're okay, if you're healthy, you're crazy.

I was deeply asleep. Now in small bursts of awakening, I have seen the ever-coming mother in many forms. My eyes have seen the glory of the ever-comingness of the Lord. And it looks like music, movies, numbers, plants...It looks like everyday superhuman things. Things I have seen but am now seeing more of what they mean, common things becoming co-ammon things, as in Amen, Amenet, Amon, Ammon, Atum, Autumn, Atom, Adam, Omen, Ominous, Omnipotent, Omnipresent, Iman, Imani, Item...
When we apply expanded awareness to the glory, which we are and are surrounded, we shall see more of what we are capable of seeing:

[S]He is coming like the glory
of the morning on the wave,
he is wisdom to the mighty,
[s]he is honor to the brave;
so the world shall be his footstool,
and the soul of wrong his slave.
Our God[dess] is marching on.

Aquaria, kaquaria, khaquaria, khakhuaria, khakhwaria,
khakh waria, khekh waria, khekh wariu, khekh war iu

**Note: “For this reason, a collapse is inevitable. And, since the severity of a collapse is invariably directly proportional to the severity of the debt, when it arrives, it will be a collapse that eclipses all previous collapses....Those who survive the coming collapse will be those who have created an economic insurance policy for themselves, in the form of tangible assets.”

If you haven't seen the broad range of violence yet, you won't until you see violence and revolution and changes in the status quo as a result of societal collapses, one by one, like dominoes – from dominators to dominoes is the way the cycle goes.

We don't understand how sinister slickery and trickery the forms of violence are. One of the main things we seek most as a form of security, is a form of violence and actually fueled the revolution of societies, capitalism, and employees as slaves. What people do for money and to keep a job. They do violent things, especially to self:
European Central Bank To Deutschebank: Simulate A Crisis

Copyright 1995-2018 Ancestors through Usekhu. All Rights Reserved.

Slickery Trickery Racism Reality CheckPhase OneUnity Consciousness #1321

.

(Part 9hk of 11)

We, the African family, should not expect anything substantial to come out of human talks of abating racism anywhere. No, not before humans fix the gender problem right down to the co-re-me-di, the core remedy, the co-remedy. As that takes place, automatically, all other evil discriminations will be significantly lessened.

As Malcolm X might say: multiple racism knives are still in our back, and your protesting against a relatively gentle Starbucks arrest, while black people are still being shot and killed daily, is akin to saying “don't twist the knife in my public space,” while it is still being pushed in and other daggers added daily all over the place, along with all the associated maladies of attacks on blacks through all institutions of society.

Where is the public outcry kickback against that?

Although it's easy to get suckered into the uppercut, if you don't pay attention to fakes, feints and the setup, I've seen the okie doke enough times to know how it feels when someone is trying to get me to be happy they are blowing smoke up my asymmetric awareness.

If you really want to do something, then in all manner of living, in your communities, in all your actions, in all your words, in all of your jobs, change how you carry out those functions when you know those functions are harming people, stop following the rules and change the rules. Band together and stand together for that.

See if you can stop racism for a day, two days, etc. Hell, see if you can even identify racism in all its forms for one hour, one day, that you encounter, regardless of which side of the shitflow you are on.

As Kwame Toure and Leonard Jefferies both have said, we need a system response, not a response based on individual incidents. Our focus must be against the system of racism – against the system of genderism.

In other words, you should not expect improvement in the racist mindset of the racist collective when they still harbor a genderism mindset against the females and little girl children of “their own race.”

Race will be an issue as long as gender is an issue.

Yet, at the same time, women ain't gonna get no justice, until they stop supporting racism.
Female fundamental problems will remain until females make fundamental change. Of course, same is true for all legal law-abiding sufferers of suppression oppressions.

In keeping with an earlier message, the ideology of genderism will not be transformed back into female and male as co-creators until humans come to a better knowledge of self as gender.

Likewise, the ideology of racism will not be transformed back into communalism until humans come to a better knowledge of self as race. And this is why DNA Testing Results are on the front lines of keeping you from the complete truth about your communal genetic heritage. And we keep paying for it. Seeking confirmation of miseducation.

Likewise, the ideology of religion will not be transformed back into spirituality of overt superhuman Sign-language until, humans come to a better knowledge of self as spirit-soul elementals.

All of the current suboptimal ideologies, in the human sense, are the result of the favored group of each society poisoning their own people, including poisoning the ones who are favored. This has been discussed many times over in terms of victims.
If we understood this, then when white people say, “this doesn't happen to us,” we would say, “yes it does, you are the main victim, violence against you happens in a different way which causes you to act in racist ways, even if only passively, perhaps not in a racial profiling sort of way, but in going along with all the racist constructs of the society, from which your white skin race credit card affords you privileges, from which you have not disavowed nor are you using fundamentally enough to change racism so you will expressly manifest the non-racist thinking and behavior you say you are all about.”

Racism is violence. Genderism is violence. Religion is violence. DNA Testing Results is violence. Everything that supports this violence, is violence. Robbery is violence ain't it? Toll roads are highway robberies are violence. It used to be “your money or your life.” Now it's your money and your life, your kid's money and their life and so on. We are all being robbed of the knowledge of self that promotes health. Acts of violence are legion in all shapes sizes and in every culture. Until we stop being narrow-minded in our use of words and think we are taking about something different when we are talking about the same thing, we are going to continue chasing our tails, spinning out of energy, as human use of words continues to spin out of the temporary human control it is in.
This will result in a chaotic transformation into a new heaven and new earth rather than a khaotic transformation. As this happens, as it is right now, hell is having to be paid because heaven is not being obeyed.

Understand What Racism Is

Is genderism an individual thing against an individual?
Then neither is racism.
Stop talking about individual incidents without talking about the system, the society, the culture, the country, the nation, the nationalism, the patriotism, the everything about the society that gives rise to the ideology.
Racism and genderism ain't going nowhere until nationalism, as currently ideologized, goes with it. This means culture must be disassembled and only parts of it used in a new construct, a new structure. That would be optimal theory, the African Utamawazo. Now tell me how many white people are willing to go that far. Hell, a lot of black folks ain't.

You can be certain that most of those same white folks who say the Starbucks incident was wrong, will also say Colin Kaepernick is wrong. Slickery trickery of the egomites is always part of the game.

This might serve as a summary: Before even thinking racism is going away, the system must be dismantled that supports racism. This requires a lot of the logic we possess about this that and the other, to change significantly. So white people deserve no kudos for protesting individual events. They must do things to dismantle the system of logic and practices that are racist that begets more racism. Yes, continue to assist others with individual situations, but also dismantle the system of racism by which you benefit via a multitude of white privilege, especially economically. Until white people are ready to give up ill-gotten gains based on being inhumane, racism will not change, at least not by the actions of white people. Properly divide words and displays of truth.

”White Racism More Than Just Prejudice”

Racism is also the same global or national system used against the favored group of people. The only way racism can exist is to convince the favored group to sustain racism by carrying our racism logic. For this to take place there must be a complete warping of logic supported by all the society's major institutions that gives the favored group prepackaged excuses to justify their thinking and behavior which is further supported by the same dumbing down process as to knowledge of self that is oppressed upon the disfavored group.
As an example to show how mentally ill we are, many us of still think that “picking cotton” is derogatory when if any of us are working jobs for someone else, we are still working on a plantation. Doesn't matter the type of work being performed. Furthermore, there were many types of non-cotton picking jobs being performed and many plantations that were not cotton plantations.

Copyright 1995-2018 Ancestors through Usekhu. All Rights Reserved.