Forty Psycho-Cultural PerpetrationsCommitted By EuropeansTo Effect DeAfricanizationPhase OneUnity Consciousness #1093

.

The promise of 40 acres and a mule was never kept, but the promise of 40 achings into a fool was.

1. Maafa
2. Infliction of psychological misorientation
3. Infliction of theological misorientation
4. Causing conceptual incarceration
5. Using the mentacide process to effect personality disorganization and consequent inferiorization or negativity
6. Effecting peripheral and alienating mentacide
7. Population decimation and slaughter
8. Slaughter of indigenous group identity
9. Inferiorization of/inflicting negativity on entire population across generations
10. Causing ineffectuality in indigenous leaders
11. Rendering humiliations on indigenous leaders
12. Cultural oppression
13. Framing indigenous traditions as abnormal and sub par
14. Disparagement of indigenous language
15. Renaming with Caucasian names
16. Exploitation of diminished ancestral memory
17. Create, unleash, and maintain extended-self-hatred (anti-African African descent people)
18. Facilitating conditions under which rage is turned inward
19. Distorting the process of group identity development into an abnormal psychology phenomenon (pathological denouement)
20. Implanting out-marriage as desideratum
21. Depleting “blood quantum” through miscegenation
22. Subject the population to de-education, diseducation, and miseducation to effect a mental slave system
23. Christianizing (using the Christian religious establishment, especially missionaries, to attack and decimate the entire population)
24. Undermining reversion to indigenous culture-centered religion
25. Disconnection from the land
26. Alienation from other kindred peoples
27. Causing inordinate amount of defensive behavior
28. “Radical evil” imbued in all aggressions and perpetrations victims are forced to inure
29. Committing anti-social acts which reinforce dehumanization
30. Quashing spiritual-moral sensibility
31. Undermining pluralism
32. Undermining the capacity of group members for orienteering as a distinct group with distinct interests
33. Preclusion of freedom (the ability to conceptualize the world in ways contiguous with the group’s history
34. Preclusion of literacy (application of one’s freedom in negotiating reality)
35. Create and maintain “a terminated people”
36. Dismal life chance statistics
37. Population in extremis
38. Circumscribing racial identity to a “nigger-to-negro” commodity
39. Creating and enforcing ADP’s (African descent people’s) “slave mentality”
40. Preclusion of psychological Africanity/African personality

Reference: Portions of the following reference have been quoted, paraphrased and significantly edited in keeping with the worldwide African climate: ”The Domain of Psychological Restoration: Reparations Down Payments for the Defeat of Mentacide, Transcendence of Psychological Misorientation, and the Mental Overturning of a Terminated People via Returning to the African Personality.” (81-2/32-3)

Accused, Accuser and AccusationUnity Consciousness #993

.

”Diluted Samples: Another Polluted Example Of Status, Unity Consciousness #990”

If you say or write something publicly about someone, you can be held accountable for slander or libel.
Yet, if you say the same thing via a court document or police report, it can be published without any corroborating evidence. Whether or not it's true is determined years later during a trial. Long before that time, the accused loses.
The person who makes the accusation, even if proven false, is generally not held accountable.

Shouldn't there be a period of time when public information is not made public? Shouldn't there at least be a preliminary investigation and accumulation of verifiable facts before court and police filings are made accessible to the general public?

If this were to happen, then, when the media hears the news and pursues the accused and the onslaughter ensues, the accuser is not allowed to turn the tables and become abuser, instead there is a reasonable amount of facts to compare to what the accused has to say.

As it currently stands, the accused has to give verifiable answers to unverified accusations.

Many Unequal Distinctions

Why does someone convicted by the courts of murder and who has done the time deserve a second chance, yet, someone convicted by the public of domestic violence and who has done the time, not deserve a second chance? Isn't murder, domestic violence?

The number of unequal distinctions which are treated very differently is mind-boggling. If we just narrowly focus on the area we call crimes, obvious contradictions jump out.
1. The murder of a police versus the murder of anyone else.
2. The abuse of an animal versus police abuse.
3. Battery by one gender versus battery by another gender.
4. Videos of police officers committing crimes are justified and videos of non-police officers committing crimes are crucified.
5. Too many of us have an “I don't break the law mentality” because we comply with what society calls illegal drugs, foods, products, other substances and services, yet, most problems in society are caused by 5. legal drugs/medications/treatments, foods, products, other substances and services.
For the naysayers, one notable example is PTSD created by what is deemed legal in America.