The Logic Of Insurance | Logic InsuranceUnity Consciousness #2237

.

( 9aob of 11)

What is insurance?
Insurance is paying money on a regular basis so a company can pay money on our behalf for a larger expense we hope happens on an irregular basis or never.

In other words, insurance is a way for us to pay a little bit at a time for something expensive. Insurance is a substitute for more disciplined savings behavior. Insurance is a lazy shortsighted layaway plan that we use to cover monetary costs but not physical, mental, emotional and spiritual costs. Insurance is a way to keep paying upfront for something so we can keep doing things we shouldn't do and keep not doing things we should do. Insurance is over assurance that we are being highly intelligent by paying money to cover the financial cost of foreseeable problems.

How did people ever live without insurance before the concept of monetary insurance came into existence?

For the most part, our logic tells us that insurance is the right thing to pay for on a regular basis just in case the wrong thing happens every now and then. We believe we need insurance but hope we don't have to use it.
We believe in these contradictions so strongly, we support, allow and agree with several types of insurance to be required by written laws in our societies.
Boy, what an easily corruptible filthy lucrative business to be in where the government requires people to purchase your product!

There is no written law requiring us to eat fruits and vegetables but there is a law requiring us to have health insurance.

Clearly the logic behind requiring people to have certain types of insurance shows us that insurance is not about protecting you, but rather is about protecting others from loss, harm, damage, especially protecting society (the government from having to give back extorted funds.)

So then, based on the logic reasons stated thus far above regarding the importance of insurance, everyone should be required to at least have logic insurance.
Shouldn't we?

Logic Insurance would not be paid by individuals on a regular basis primarily with money.
No, instead, it would be paid for on a regular basis by redirecting and reallocating resources to teach healthy knowledge of self. This would be paid for by the collective using any means necessary.

Logic Insurance would basically consist of continuous study regarding who you are, where you came from and why you are here.

The lack of healthy logic insurance is the greatest most costly expense to everyone involved who have not evolved.

The lack of healthy logic insurance is the direct human cause of all societal ills, problems and expenses such as Maafa racism, genderism, racism, climate change, plandemics, homelessness, cancer, greed, walking dead syndrome, sleep walking syndrome and so on.

Re-imagine a world where logic insurance was the number one preventative prophylactic activity engaged in. This activity would consist of investing in learning a little more healthy logic every day in order to protect against the slow creeping buildup that leads to future catastrophic damages due to defective logic.

Hell, we choose to live in flood zones then we get flood insurance.
We choose to live in flammable houses, then we get fire insurance.
We choose to take in more toxins than nutrition, then we get health insurance.
We live la vida loca then we get life insurance that can in no way cover the cost or compensate for a dead wrong led wrong life.
We feel good about these insurances because we think we are protected and have paid enough upfront to be fully covered while allowing ourselves to still be charged deductibles and copayments and be subjected to denials and coverage limitations. That monetary insurance we keep paying for keeps telling us that money, as a means of insurance, can only go so far towards helping us in areas we need the most help in.

Yet we choose to hold on to large amounts of fault-ridden logic, but the thought never occurs to us to get logic insurance, even as we continue to pay enormous costs of problematic logic.

Quickly rethinking, we can divide logic insurance into three categories: gullible logic insurance, ignorance logic insurance and stupidity logic insurance.
These types of logic insurance are progressive, cumulative and age-related. They should be required as follows: ages 0-10 for gullibility; ages 11-21 for ignorance; and ages 22+ for stupidity.

What other creature lives 22 years and remains stupid?
This age group, being the largest, is the most dangerous because of the rights and privileges this group exercises in the society.

I and the world would have been far better off if my caregivers and I had been taught to and required to invest in these types of logic insurance.

Most countries have citizenship tests and invest lots of resources into administering them and teaching people to memorize the desired acceptable responses.

Along these lines, but to a more fundamental extent of logic insurance, if a person's logic, at any age level, is not able to pass the healthy logic test that shows that person can live in harmony with all else, then that person, their caregivers and other teachers (a broad category) would be quarantined and taught until all of their logic, individually and collectively passes based on age levels of the individuals and age level of the grouping the society has designed and organized to teach healthy logic to minimize foreseeable problems.

In other words, logic is more of a collective responsibility for individuals at younger ages and more of an individual responsibility for individuals at older ages.

Self-responsibility and self-determination are the last controllable fail safe escape hatches from remaining unaware and a problem addict to tragic logic. The absence of the requirement to have healthy logic insurance is another Pinocchio nose on the face of your society.

Civilizations invest heavily in logic insurance that protects against loss and retardation of human beingness.

Be certain to understand that logic insurance does already exist right now in your society and has always existed.

Counter to the way civilizations function, current-day societies continue to invest heavily in spreading logic to ensure more problems are implemented rather than solutions. This is why schoolbooks are required to be filled with lies and contextual approaches that dumb down, numb down and causes people to rally around logic that fundamentally holds them down while preventing them from being grounded.
One of two things is true.
1. What our societies reflect is the result of gullibility and ignorance OR
2. What our societies reflect is the result of stupidity.

All evidence points to the conclusion that our societies are filled with logic that serves as insurance to harm and damage others, thus try like hell to keep as many of us as possible from our optimal selves, thus the optimal combination of all else.

What person age 22 and over doesn't know that our societies are filled up with fucked up logic?

Most of the stuff that dominates our daily lives is in no way the healthy norm. This is why the most important aspects of life and existence are barely, rarely or never achieved by most humans due to the pervasive practice of investing in unhealthy logic insurance rather than healthy logic insurance.

All this is to say that our societies continue to invest heavily in ensuring we have mental illness (gullibility, ignorance, stupidity). Meanwhile the society defines mental illness in a very confined way, as it does with all its definitions and meanings.
The only solution against that which breeds mental illness is the absolution of that which breeds society. One means to do so is dissolution of society through the Primordial Four.

Become more aware of how many times in your daily life you think about or hear about some type of insurance.
Isn't there a more resource effective, benefit effective, more intelligent way to invest your resources into improving your controllable logic that will protect the four inseparable aspects of self and all else against the greatest pair of dangers – human thinking and behavior?

By The Way, why do more houses have lawn sprinkler systems and garden irrigation systems but not indoor sprinkler systems or fire extinguishers in every room or built in a way to limit fires to a single room? Aren't some of these things better types of insurance?

I'm amazed at how many people, after a fire or tornado or flood, talk about the loss of irreplaceable items such as pictures, yet those people, and most others, do not invest in containers that are fire resistant to store their irreplaceable items in.