From The Previous Message
Many texts place the onus for sinning in each person's personal court.For humans such as us, despite the ability to make choices, none of us can live a lifetime without senning and sinning. It's baked into the cake of continuously changing conditions on various scales. Of the many reasons affecting choices and contributing to sinning, one reason is lack of knowledge (Does this sound familiar? I.E. Garden of Eden where Eve and Adam had the match game stacked against them). Another reason is lack of other forms of nutrition. Another reason is lack of the most basic handful of basic needs. The opposite of each overlapping reason for sinning, is what facilitates senning.
Sinners who reject becoming senners are too corrupted, weak, disabled and retarded to change because change would be to admit wrongness, and that is too much for some spirits to bare and bear, since they are the severely damaged spawn of the barbaric barbar-rak that births rabble. Also too much for these broken people, is the work required to rework logic, thinking behavior and society. So the choice is more entangled and layered than simply choosing between right and wrong. In almost all cases, the nearest easiest accessible off ramp escape route from responsible thinking, is the continuous choice made. This is due to the life-long nurture of long-life nature of sin.
Additional Thoughts
To say this another way, as we get older and accumulate goo-gobs of information, each choice becomes increasingly divided by many pathways and connections between information. So in order to make a course correction different choice between right and wrong, we have to logically go back to what we consider the central centering taproot of truth. Is it ourselves, our parents, our country, our gender, our race, our skin color, our Godspeak, being human, human law, natural law, our jobs, our titles, our successes, our failures, experts... What is our basis from which all truth always springs?
Then, each step of the way (each piece of logic on the information highway), we need to check the switch to see if it's set to what we know or what we believe, then double-check to see if it's what we consider true or false or don't know.
This rechecking and setting of logic switches creates a Line of Reasoning circuit that leads back to the point of being a pure wise spirit, our last known good configuration. This is when we had little to no outer information for the dimension we were born into, thus relied on inner information we came with as the basis of our worldview in the womb of peace and harmony with self and the womb environment. We were free in a free state of being that don't last always.
This causes us to resort to our current default of choices already made.
In most instances, the choice to not reset a switch is consciously intentional, even when we know why we should reset the switch. Once again, this circuit resistance is because we realize if we reset that switch, then we have to reset a lot of other switches, and that is not only a lot of work, it also threatens our sense of self-worth self-estimation picture of who we are.
This type of behavior continues until we reach the point of almost no return age of always short-circuiting the circuitry of choice-making.This quick self-jedi mind trick makes it easy street legal, in our minds, to skip the many-layered, many branched pieces of logic that inform our choice-making.
The trick is to convince ourselves we can actually take the rapid unimpeded instantaneous direct route shortcut through mountains, through oceans, through rivers, through canyons, through trees, through anything.
We think we can do this by skipping the mountainous question of right or wrong, the oceanous question of true or false, the cavernous question of sin or sen, the riverous question of whose lawful or whose unlawful, and the heavily forested question of legal or illegal,
We think our mental leaps, bounds, contortions and gymnastics carry through to safely bring along our emotions, bodies and spirit-souls, through each such process used to make choices. So we think, and so we think we have made it safely through to the other side of another choice.
We have not.
When we reach the age of using such a weak illusion based process, all choices are made using the new default pre-choice of “whether we want to keep on doing what we've been doing.” See Epitome Example below.
God Save The Children
When we are much younger, choices are simple. We don't worry about who we are, what people think, whether we need to change or made a mistake or how it's going to affect my money and so on. The choice is simply about gaining understanding using information that is not contradictory. This is why, in our early days we ask a lot of “Why” questions.We do this because our pure wise spirit younger selves inherently know that information whose “why component” fits the information and with all other information and whys, then choices are easy to make. Choices remain consistent with what we continue to learn about self and about all else. We remain whole, not broken, because our circuitry is intact in and among the five inseparable aspects of self.
We are able to easily handle the many “whys” and “why nots” that can be associated with each piece of logic information we use.
This is so because each set of things true, form their own mini central circuit.
Thus when we are raised right, we automatically form sub-circuits that are checkpoints.
This provides multiple opportunities to fix logic before a lot more is added to the mix, and before we become trapped in our own tangled mangled grown-ass logic connections that cause choice-making to frequently take on the conscious and/or subconscious feel, nature and risk of wiring or diffusing a bomb.
Since these bombs never just affect the individual, and since no one individual of any species can firsthand gather all the information it needs, the individual must rely on others. Thus every onus and choice of the individual, and the responsibility, extends to the group, the collective, and the other way around.
04.22.26 Additional Detail
When we set switches and reset flip them, we open the circuit to the side the switch is set which closes the other side. This allows thought processing to easily flow along the Line of Reasoning we have predetermined set for each piece (group) of information.When we set the switch to the middle, meaning, I don't know, each time the thought process reaches this point, we have to slow down at this fork in the road and choose which way to let the logic flow this time. This is because the middle setting blocks the entire road like a log-ic jam that requires brakes to be applied.
For most of us, there are a lot of things we are unsure of, don't know, so our thought processes require our frequent conscious active participation, rather than become so subconsciously involuntary that a choice is automatically spat out.
So to cheat the process and ourselves, we replace a lot of, I'm not sures and I don't knows, with, I believe it's true (flip right), I believe it's false (flip left). We do this because we feel we need no basis for the belief and it is unchallengeable, unassailable and valid, just because it's a falsely named “personal” choice. Unless your choice only affects you, it is not a personal choice. Religion is not a personal choice, for instance, because the follow-on decisions you make that are influenced by your religion choice, affects others.
Thus we support a significant portion of the weight of our lives on choice toothpicks at critical points of thinking and behaving.
Thus our cognition flows quick and easy street-like because we've greased the cogs with way too much belief. We use belief as a workaround chokepoints where we need to do some critical analysis and self-study. Instead, what happens is, our logic becomes so loose, we end up no longer in control of our choices because our lack of thinking on our own, has caused us to imperceptibly not know the difference between our beliefs and the beliefs of others, many who dress up and masquerade their belief as knowledge.
Epitome Example
The Permanence of Racism in White Narcissist America04.23.26 It Doesn't Matter
It doesn't matter is the last but not least logic point used most often that influences thought processes.Many people use the, It doesn't matter, logic statement when they don't want something to matter, until it does. When they want you to think it doesn't matter to them. When they want you to treat it as if it doesn't matter, when it really does. Truth is, if something didn't really matter, there'd be no need to mention it because it would not come up and enter into the thought process. The moment someone mentions something and are told it doesn't matter, a false statement has been made. It matters to the person who asked the question or introduced the topic. It matters to the thought process of both people as to why the topic was brought up and why the other person thinks it does not apply.
At the decision point, the person in their mind, creates a bypass around, over or under, in order to avoid thinking about it again, having to deal with it, seeking, finding, figuring, sorting and working it out.
When the “it doesn't matter” ploy is used to fool the fooler, it exponentially magnifies contradictions, which likewise magnifies the need for more justifications of logic whose basis comes from bypassing information.
