Here's another big one. They considered themselves white, but DNA tests told a more complex story Despite the above article and thousands just like it, it has also been sufficiently explained elsewhere, why it is impossible for any human on this Earth to be anything other than 100% African in their genetic makeup. However, it is possible to be a 100% variety of something and still be 100% African. A yellow rose is 100% a yellow rose. A yellow rose is still 100% a rose. Search keywords such as genetics, family tree, dna and especially “dna testing results” and whatever else the spirit leads you to. All of us, despite our “differences,” have still only been having sex with other Africans in order to reproduce. I understand we have “feelings” about things, but “feelings” just add flavor, they don't change the substance. The current stories about our genetic makeup based on DNA Testing Results are made up. They are made up lies. But this process must be necessary to move people slowly back to the full truth about who we all are. If every rose that exists, leads back to the same rose bush, then all roses, red, yellow, etc. are still 100% the genetic makeup of the original rosebush. It can't be anything else. Where does any other rose get some different genetics?
Just because later versions of the original are bred together, doesn't make any of them or any of their reproductions or any of their variations, somehow have less than 100% of the genetic makeup of the original. All they have is a different formulation of the same 100%. Same goes for humans. Same goes for all other species. Come on now people, quit lying to yourself.
If you are less than 100% African in your genetic makeup, then where did you get that other percentage?
Where did that non-African original, who didn't have any African genetics, come from - - that then caused you to be only partially African?
