Misguided Miseducated Jury Verdicts In Kangaroo CourtsUnity Consciousness #2376

.

(9atj of 11)

What has evidence of the past 13,000 years reminded us about the masses of humans?
Masses are usually right when the people have organized themselves into a civilization.
Masses are usually wrong when the people have organized themselves into a society.

Legal juries for court cases are chosen out of the general population of the masses, which is accurately stated as a jury of peers. These peers must then focus and take in both sides of an argument, each side containing multiple components.
Simply put, each person on a jury must do some extended critical thinking, something most of us have never done or only done rarely. This is evident because too many people go along with too much that's wrong. If most people did not go along, then the wrong wouldn't last for long.
Secondly, each person (now called a juror) must resist becoming subject to groupthink and group acceptance and false notions of intelligence that convinces a person they understand when they don't.

Now even if a juror could avoid groupthink in the jury room, the person would have to have a significant amount of wholeness of self in order to have exorcised the groupthink of the society they were raised in.

As we approach another session of highly publicized Kangaroo Court in the USA with Derek Chauvin, a white male who murdered a black male and was assisted by others on the spot and in the society, what are the chances you can find 12 to 14 people who are not mentally ill miseducated, thus their critical thinking is in tact and active with wholeness?

Has that ever been the predominant composition of any jury in the USA?
No.

The Kangarooing started long ago in the USA. It's part of the culture. We can see how most of the information we've seen so far has been ridiculously displayed, which is why Chauvin (another Amber “waves of grain” Guyger) is not charged with first degree murder of George Floyd.

What we can be certain of is what we have already seen.

The same miseducated logic used by jurors to judge the facts, would change if they, or someone they cared about, were the plaintiff or defendant. In other words, when people have organized themselves into a society, a jury of your peers is a jury of people who don't care about the rights of creation, they take into account many other misguided miseducated considerations.

All this is to say that the Kangaroo Court is not the society's legal courtroom. Instead, the Kangaroo Court is the society itself.