Most people are not interested in what you have to say, but only interested in whether you agree or disagree with what they've said.
Once agreement or disagreement is determined, all the other words you say is jibber-jabber to them. They do not care about the basis of what you think or how you arrived at that thought. They especially don't care about the seasonality of your thought. Seasonality is the variations in the thought that takes place based on changing conditions, changing variables.
A focus on agreement or disagreement takes one point in time (in mind, in thought) and assumes it is the story for all times under all circumstances.
Most People
In the first sentence above, the phrase “Most People” is used.Word most is word mest. Thus Most People are Mest People.
This means most people have a one-sided understanding of how agreement and disagreement work. To them it's either one or the other, To them it can't be both. This means most people use the mest people aspect of their being to limit their thought processes so they can justify limiting self and all else so,in their confined spirit mind, there is no need for balance, fairness, justice, equality, democracy, freedom, merit, harmony, responsibility, guilt.
Yet, in the original Mest of all creation, agreement and disagreement are equal to sameness and difference, and coexist simultaneously.
The mest is the substrate from which all creations are formed. Ultimately, word Mest is word Mekh, word Muck, word Rekh, word Rock, the grain of sart that is the seed starter of everything (all creations, all elementals, all elements, all that is the same, all that is different, all that disagrees, all that agrees).
The mest is the macro stem cell, the universal system substance that is the sameness of God from which the difference of God is formed from universality to duality to trinity.Every truth is designed to work at least three ways (one way first, the other way second, both ways together). This there is time, place and season for sameness, difference, both. Likewise then, this is equal to saying, there is a time, place and season for agreement, disagreement, both. All three basic combinations are the trinity of thought that is the thought process of God. This we know through the basic form of Mother, Son, Father, the basic family unit expressing sameness, difference, both, agreement, disagreement, both.
In the basic cycle of every circle of truth, there is sameness, disagreement, difference and agreement always manifesting throughout the entire cycle, including at the poles and at the equator, at the ends and in the middle.
It is a good thing that some creations are designed to only think about and focus on whether or not they are in agreement or disagreement, whether their logic is in agreement or disagreement, whether their interactions are in agreement or disagreement, whether their relationship is in agreement or disagreement with their intended purposes, primary and secondary.Humans such as us are supposedly the world's greatest. If so, we should be able to seamlessly think using the basic trinity of logic. We should be able to rightly divide and rightly join words of truth from one grain with one part, with two parts, with three parts, then to three grains to two grains to one grain with three parts,
Mest People
Contrary to the opening sentence and in the original sense, Mest people ARE interested in what others have to say, plus how, why, when and where they agree and disagree.
Again, mest is the basic substance of existence from which everything is formed, this is why word most means what it means, but more fully, word most means all.
This is why word mest is equal to mesti is equal to manu is equal to word mean which serves as the word to describe the definition of each and every word (every and each creation).
Word mean as word manu is also word fine which fits the usage to communicate the idea of small, detail, beautiful, look good, attractive, but also includes lesser usage as, large, general, ugly, look bad, unattractive. Using one of these as a template reminder that applies to the other meanings, what is small is also simultaneously large. This we would remember if we were in the habit of always using a grain of salt. Then we would already have the template that what is one is also simultaneously many. And that what is strong is also simultaneously weak. And that what agrees in some aspects and times, must also simultaneously disagree in other aspects and times. This is normal and healthy.
