We certainly give police who murder people the benefit of the doubt, even when caught on camera.
Crimes of racism don't get the same consideration as a female who claims sexual assault.
It's okay to form an initial baseline opinion as long we understand it as such and continue to question as we would question anyone about anything. All three of the stories from the women accusing Kavanaugh, beg many questions. The burden of proof must be beyond an evidence-based reasonable doubt. Not just simply, I believe her, I don't believe him. Belief is a thief in the sight. If societies take this approach to seeking justice, it will spiritually infringe upon the rights of those seeking rights. The use of a lower ideology to achieve a higher ideology will offer short-term benefit and invite dem chickens to turn the other way. Have we forgotten there are plenty of people in every type of demographic that will lie about anything for free, for the fun of it, for the heck of, for the habit of it? Up the ante with another incentive and they will ramp up the lie. Have we forgotten that numerous people, such as an entire nation will support a lie? No credit should be given based on the number of accusers. Poor ole White Male Privileged Rooster Kavanaugh getting pecked to death by the lesser roosters and chickens. He deserves it but it still delays the arrival of civilization because it gives energy to deeply suboptimal thinking and behavior.
