If you do not understand racism (white supremacy) and how it works, everything else you understand will only confuse you. - Neely Fuller

We need something to clarify everything for us, because we get confused...but if we use the concept of Asili, we will understand that whatever it is they are doing, whatever terms they use, however they come at you, you need to be thinking about what? How is this going to facilitate their power and help them to dominate me? -Marimba Ani

Sunday, December 2, 2018

Beauty Is In The Eye Of The Beholder | Definitions & Meanings
Unity Consciousness #1500

.

(Part 9od of 11)

We've discussed definitions and meanings of universal beauty and the beautiful one. We've also covered the original beholder as beau and belle. The “be”holder is the parent, circle, whole truth, spirit-soul, elemental, child, seed, self. The beholder is the parent holder, the circle holder, the whole truth holder, spirit-soul holder, elemental holder, child holder, seed holder, self holder.
We briefly go over “eye” again.

The Eye Is

1. A mirror that reflects what it sees. Eye, in the fullest sense of the word, sees everything in order to allow the beholder to be all it can be.
The universe, the circle, the abyss and the womb are all forms of the eye because they reproduce the image of the seed. Including starting from the seed of thought.

2. A reproducer of the image. The logic in us determines what we see. For instance, whether we see a plant or a weed.
3. A Judge.
4. A star in any form as sun, moon, planet.
5. A person.

Thoughts On Beauty Is In The Eye Of The Beholder

Remember: Beauty is the whole truth united to think and behave as a universal ecosystem. This does not take place until “it is what it is.” Until “it” = what “it” =. Until it = it = ?. Until what we're looking at, thinking about, or talking about, is the same thing as what it actually is, which is entirety. Until beauty is what beauty is fully. Beauty fully. Beautiful. Until our understanding of beauty is what beauty actually is at the fundamental universal level where fullness exists.

1. Beauty is in the eye of vision. This vision is in the mind and comes from what we experience and the language we use to communicate thoughts, ideas, experiences, observations.

2. Beauty is in the eye of tele-vision. Search “television.” Also consider the truth that telepathic vision can also be radio, books, school and any form of media through which information is transmitted or received. See also media.

3. Beauty is in the eye of logic. What you see as beauty is based on logic your mind retrieves. Someone told us what a bird is. Someone told us what beauty is.

4. Beauty is in the eye of language. Sign-language is the basis of understanding beauty. To the degree our language communicates the fullness of nature, is the degree our thinking and behavior regarding beauty, reflects the fullness of what beauty is.

5. Beauty is in the eye of understanding. Beauty is in the mirror of understanding. Your logic is the mirror. Your logic reflects what you think beauty is. This does not necessarily match what beauty actually fully truly is. So much is emphasized as understanding being the principle thing. Yet we must go back to the components of understanding, the bits and pieces of logic, the context, definitions, meanings,

6. Seeing is believing, but seeing is only part of believing. This is already known, because we also believe what we do not see. Seeing with physical eyes is a sensing ability. The optimal form of belief uses all the senses, all sensing abilities, all ways of knowing. This causes belief to mature into knowing.
7. Beauty is in the eye of the seer.

8. Beauty is in the eye of the person, the place, the thing.

9. Beauty is in the vibration motion of the verb “to be.” See Kerub.

10. Beauty is in the eye of self. What you see in yourself reflects the beauty you see in something else.

11. Partial, Immature, Prepubescent Beauty exists when the eye of the beholder does not see the fullness of the two truths such as spirit-soul, or in the form of the elementals, or in the form of self and all else, or in the form of thinking and behavior that forms a healthy ecosystem.

12. Beauty is in the eye of the parent holder. Understand what beauty is and compare it to what parent is. Compare and contrast with what you currently think.

13. Beauty is in the eye of the circle holder. Understand what beauty is and compare it to what circle is. Compare and contrast with what you currently think.

14. Beauty is in the eye of the whole truth holder.

15. Beauty is in the eye of the spirit-soul holder.

16. Beauty is in the eye of the elemental holder,

17. Beauty is in the eye of the child holder.

18. Beauty is in the eye of the seed holder.

19. Beauty is in the eye of the self holder. Behold yourself. In doing so you will also be beholding the extent of beauty from your perspective.

Where We Went Wrong?

This recent age has been plagued by the colonization of information by a status quo that thrives on the suboptimization of creation.
“But as it is hardly possible to define all the properties which constitute beauty, we may observe in general, that beauty consists in whatever pleases the eye of the beholder, whether in the human body, in a tree, in a landscape or in any other object.” (from Noah Webster's "Dictionary of the English Language," 1828)
Clearly Webster's view of beauty is extremely limited to the human sense of seeing with physical eyes.
This does have credence in the natural fact that early humans found beauty by looking at females and other creations who were being full with life. The difference is, they “backed up and supported” their visual understandings of beauty, by obtaining more understandings of the causes and effects of the beauty evidenced by the pregnant belly.
However, today, we do not support our visual definition of beauty. We leave it as personal preference. Thus we are married to the surface and divorced from deeper, more factual understandings of beauty. As we do go deeper, our definitions of beauty will expand and consolidate. (BB 52/64, 243/255)

Beholder Behavior

The ability to “behold” requires the ability to see in darkness and in lightness. In other words, the ability to see all forms of a truth. (BB 56/68)
The ability to “behold” is based on the words, taht and teka, both of which lead to the words “taught” and “teach.” As said earlier, what we learn, are taught, are educated with and socialized into, is what determines the beauty we behold. Teka, Taht, Teach and Taught are words that mean to illuminate by fixing and attaching understandings of what exists in one form to understandings of what exists in another form. (BB 157/169)

The person who is properly taught has the ability to mix and match all forms of truth and still be able to keep in touch with the whole truth. This is the process of beingness, the process of maturing evolving becoming one again, united in consciousness of the total self. This is what allows us to see beauty through the eyes of the original beholder. (NG2 507/515)

The original beholder is the beautiful one who changed forms and was still able to see self as the beauty.

As an additional note, Taht, Tekhi and Tekh are also stated in terms of the Moon as the eye because the moon reproduces the image like a mirror. It reproduces the sunstar and the polestar. (NG2 284-5/292-3)

Behold As A Verb

Behold means to look, see, view, gaze, notice, pay attention to, watch, observe with any of the senses. By default then, to behold means to investigate, examine, seek understandings.
Beauty is in the eye of the one who looks for the purpose of investigating, examining and seeking understandings. Neither beautiful or beauty can be fully comprehended without such an approach. Eventually early humans came to this understanding and then we, later humans, lost it. Now the reversal of process, the remembering is taking place.

Beauty is the Creator-Destroyer. The Eye is the Creator-Destroyer. The Beholder is the Creator-Destroyer.
So the sentence, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, becomes.... the creator-destroyer is in the creator-destroyer of the creator-destroyer.
Or the sentence reads as, beauty is in the beauty of the beauty.

So then, in order to understand “ Beauty is in the eye of the beholder,” all it takes is to understand one part of the sentence completely. In doing so, we will learn that the one part we are understanding, is actually the same as the other parts.
This eventually leads us to everything is everything, and to everything is beauty when taken in consideration of everything.

To say this another way. If beauty is in the eye, then the the eye is beauty, thus beauty is in the beauty. Secondly, if the eye is beauty, then so also is the holder of the eye, thus beauty is in the beauty of the beauty. If this beauty is not the same, then the eye and the beholder are unable to perceive the fullness of what beauty is.

Does the beauty we see, exist as single totality, or as a duality of totality or as a trinity of totality? Does the image we see in the mirror of the eye reflect the truth about self as the beholder?

It always does.

Does difference prevent sameness?

It never does no matter how many degrees of separation. No not even of space and time.

How can everything that started out the same be different and no longer the same?

In the eye of the beholder as one of us but not the rest of us.
In the eye of the beholder as many but not one.


Copyright 1995-2018 Ancestors through Usekhu. All Rights Reserved.