If you do not understand racism (white supremacy) and how it works, everything else you understand will only confuse you. - Neely Fuller

We need something to clarify everything for us, because we get confused...but if we use the concept of Asili, we will understand that whatever it is they are doing, whatever terms they use, however they come at you, you need to be thinking about what? How is this going to facilitate their power and help them to dominate me? -Marimba Ani

Saturday, August 27, 2022

Dakota Sioux Missouri Native American Indians
From Africa's Nile Valley Great Lakes Region
Unity Consciousness #2795

(9azzzzzzzzzzzh of 11)

When you say you are from Missouri, although you might be thinking geographically in the Usa, at deeper levels you are also saying you are from the Missouri tribe of Indians from Africa. This is true of all names. This becomes clear through name origins, name histories, name etymologies, name onomastics, name genealogies and name family trees.

Show me a branch of humans and their fruits whose relatively very recent existence is their main proof of what they produce and of their beginnings, and I will show you roots grown in make-believe as truth that will go poof!

The etymology I suspect is: Mesteriu, Mistori, Missori, Missouri

Per State of Missouri, Missouri gets its name from Sioux Indians called the Missouris. The word "Missouri" is said to mean "muddy water" but others say it means "town of the large canoes," "wooden canoe people" or "he of the big canoe." https://www.sos.mo.gov/archives/history/history

Per Online Etymology Dictionary, Missouri was originally a name for a group of native peoples among Chiwere (Siouan) tribes. Missouri comes from an Algonquian word recorded approximately 1700 CE and is said to mean "people of the big canoes." https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=missouri

Per KCUR 89.3, The tribe’s original Chiwere name was Nyutachi. But as a result of miscommunication among Native Americans and colonizers, over time it came to be known as Missouria. https://www.kcur.org/history/2021-04-25/a-native-american-tribe-gave-missouri-its-name-now-its-descendants-are-preserving-a-fading-language

Per University of Pittsburgh, The name Missouri derives from Bemessourit, an Algonquian term that refers to “people with canoes (made from logs),” and the popular mistranslation “muddy water” derives from Pekitanoui, an Algonquian name for the river. These terms were first used in 1673 CE by Marquette in his journal and on his map of the Mississippi River and it tributaries. Within a generation, French explorers and cartographers, using a variety of spellings and grammatical forms, had simplified the name to Missouri and applied it to the river as well as to the people, completely abandoning Pekitanoui. Those who lived on its banks—the Otos and Missouris—had other (Siouan) terms for the river. https://ans-names.pitt.edu/ans/article/view/1561

Per Names & Their Histories, Missouri is a French spelling of the native name Missuri, the ' great muddy river, as contrasted with the Mississippi, whose waters are clear.

Also from Names & Their Histories, Dakota takes its name from a confederation of seven tribes calling themselves Dahcota, which signifies 'friends,' 'allies,' or 'confederates.' The Dahcotas were called by their enemies Nadowe-ssi-wag, an Algonkin term which signifies 'the snake-like ones,' 'the enemies,' and a portion of this name, ssi-iuag or siwng, was corrupted by the French into Sioux. The term Sioux or Sioan is now used as a linguistic term, Dahcota being reserved in a narrower sense as an ethnic designation.
I suspect Dak + otos likely from Mak, family or clan that rules

The Main Point Is That the Missouri and Indians Anywhere In The World Are Africans And Were Black Under Different Names First In The Locations Currently Found Before Taking On Other Colorations, Features And Cultural Variations

There are many details above that could be discussed further, corrected and clarified. I am mainly focusing on the point that Chiwere is the same as Chewere, Cherewe, Kerewe, Ukerewe, Ucherewe, Ucherewa, Chichewa, Chewa, Ewa, Ewe (Ioway) Iowa and more. The Chewa people are also known as Nyanja - people of the great lake, great waters, sea - who speak Chinyanja - the language of the lake. This is the same language as Chichewa. In all this we can see connections to information from other sources about the Africans now named Missouri Indians.

As a second point, it is likely that many of the so-called Native American Indian tribes are also Algonquian/Algonquin/Algonkin, since this language is used in the naming of many tribes, people, places and things. Also simultaneously possible is that the Algonquian were so numerous, they were the first or most willing to work with Europeans, thus most gullible.

Algonquin is a corruption of Algomequin, which means ' those on the other side of the river, the St. Lawrence. (Names & Their Histories)

Also numerous are the Iroquois tribes who. Hewitt believes “Iroquios” is Algonkin, from their Mohegan (Mohican) tribal word “irinako,” with the French suffix -ois, meaning 'those who are true snakes.' The word “irin” or “ilin” is common to most Algonkin tongues, and is found in the name of the Linapi or Lenape tribe (Delawares), the 'real men' [par excellence] from api, 'men,” Hale, on the other hand, suggests, with greater probability, that Iroquois is from the verbal form 'ierokua,' meaning 'they who smoke.' 'Rokwa' is the theme of the noun 'garokwa' or 'karokwa,' a pipe. (Names & Their Histories)

Because it is a fundamental truth of roots, the main point of this message has been proven many times about humans, Africans, Indians and all people who go by any name.

To think this is untrue would also be to believe that all the group names of white people in Europe means they are different people with different origins and no one common source.
To think this is untrue would also be to believe that all the group names of dogs, wolves, foxes, jackals and canines means that are different animals with different origins and no one common source.

The word “Indian,” as in those in North America, is not synonymous with red, red people or red man, unless we are speaking of the mythological Indian in one phase of his expression.