Ordinary Matter
1. Also called ordinary atomic matter, baryonic matter, normal matter. 2. Everything we can see or detect with telescopes or microscopes per nasa. [Thus what is ordinary is based on what these humans can see or detect] 3. Per NASA, everything we can see is really only 3 percent of the entire universe. 4. Researchers from University of California claim they found all of the missing ‘normal’ matter in the vast empty space between galaxies.[The matter was said to be “lurking” as if it was hiding. They continue to ignore their contradictions by confidently saying the space between galaxies is sparse and only contains a very small amount of atoms. Thus they are saying that even though all of the missing ordinary matter was found between galaxies and stars, that space is still relatively empty. They ignore the fact that they thought that same space was totally empty. Then dem dry bones folks say there must be dark matter and dark energy in outer space, which evidently must not be the same place as sparse space or empty space.] 5. [Standard thinking among European academics and governments is that they know how to measure the big bang; therefore they claim to know how much matter there was in the beginning of the universe. If you swallow that, you will also believe these same folks know what color underwear God wore on big bang day.] Per the University of California, the researchers were able to directly detect the missing matter using the phenomenon of fast radio bursts—brief flashes of energy that appear to come from random directions in the sky and last for just milliseconds. Scientists don’t know what causes them, but say it must involve incredible energy.
Dark Matter
1. Per Energy.gov, the term dark matter was coined in 1933 by Fritz Zwicky of the California Institute of Technology to describe the unseen matter that must dominate one feature of the universe—the Coma Galaxy Cluster. The galaxies in the Coma Cluster were moving too quickly for as much mass as there appeared to be. Dark matter was a potential explanation.[this suggests velocity or speed are dependent on mass] Per National Institute of Health, dark matter is known to exist because of its gravitational effects—stars in the outer reaches of galaxies seem to be moving faster than they should, given the visible material present, as if they were being tugged by some huge unseen mass.Per NAP, cluster galaxies move at high speeds, and the mass necessary to hold them together in the cluster far exceeds that contained in all the stars that make up the galaxies. Light emitted by distant galaxies that passes by a cluster is bent by the gravitational effect of the cluster dark matter, as predicted by Einstein’s theory. 2. Per NASA, dark matter can't be seen, but we know it is present in the halos of galaxies and in vast galaxy clusters [contradicts paragraph below that says galaxies are composed of ordinary matter] because of its gravitational effect on ordinary matter. All particles of matter are attracted to each other through the force of gravity.
Per Energy.gov, Dark matter only interacts with ordinary matter through gravity. [why would two forms of matter only interact via gravity especially when those two forms are the main two forms? Gravity is a bitch of a glitch in current-day thinking. We try to fix the glitch by forcing logic to fit the gravity schematic as if the theory of gravity is accurate, despite numerous problems with getting gravity to fit with other fundamental forces.] 3. Per Nasa, dark matter seems to be the "glue" holding galaxies together with all their ordinary matter. [contradicts paragraph above that says dark matter is present in vast galaxy clusters]. 4. Per Nasa, the mass of ordinary matter alone is not enough to hold “glue” galaxies together. Galaxies would fly apart if not for the extra, dark mass. Per the National Academies Press (NAP), dark matter holds the universe together.
The nature of dark matter is a mystery. The leading candidates for dark matter are new particles whose existence is predicted by theories that attempt to unify the forces and particles of nature. Showing that one (or several) of these particles compose the dark matter not only would answer a key question in cosmology but also would shed new light on the fundamental forces and particles of nature. [these are goals of this miniseries]One final source weighs in on what holds galaxies together. Per The Atlantic, Dark matter accounts for a host of observations: the tight cohesion of galaxies and packs of galaxies. 5. Per the California Institute of Technology, dark matter is weakly interacting uncharged elementary particles produced in the early universe. [the elementary particles portion is correct]
Dark matter exists in extended halos around individual galaxies or in a sea through which cluster galaxies move. Dark-matter particles must not interact with ordinary matter very much, if at all; otherwise, dark matter would by now have dissipated energy and relaxed to the more concentrated structures where only baryons are found. 6. Per NAP, computer simulations of the evolution of cold dark matter predict more substructure within galactic halos than is seen and a higher concentration of dark matter at the centers of galaxies and clusters than is measured. [the substructure and concentration are moves in the right direction] Dark matter neither emits nor absorbs light.
7. Per NAP, clues to the nature of dark matter will come from astronomical observations as well as from study of the evolution of structure in the universe. [study of evolution is useful]
Ordinary Energy
Per Nasa, photons, like matter, are attracted by gravity. [This implies light from the Sun is attracted to Earth and/or falls to Earth because light is more dense than everything it passes through to reach Earth and more dense than water and more dense than human skin.]Dark Energy
1. Per Nasa, dark energy refers to the force that is accelerating the expansion of the universe. [Let's recap. Because objects are moving faster than expected, we are told there must be dark matter' Secondly, because the universe is expanding unexpectedly, that must be due to dark energy. Now for the second two parts of what we are being told. First when mass is moving due to an unknown force, that force causing motion must be matter. Secondly when matter is expanding on a universal scale, that growth must be due to energy. What say you about how much sense that makes?] 2. Gravity pulls things together, and this familiar force should act to slow down the expansion of the universe[why should gravity as an attractive force slow down expansion?]. Yet the universe continues to fly wide open faster and faster. No one knows why [yet this does not stop them from saying they know it's dark energy]. 3. Per Nasa, the dark energy causing the expansion of the universe is exerting a repulsive gravitational force, as opposed to the normal attractive force of gravity. Repulsive gravity is also called an "anti-gravity" force and called quintessence or a cosmological constant. 4. Per NAP, dark energy by its very nature is extremely diffuse [spread out], and its effect can be felt only on the largest scales, where it influences the expansion of the universe and the growth of structure within it. [to limit dark energy to the macro is a clue that there's something very wrong with logic associated with dark energy. Is there not macro and micro energy? Is there not macro and micro spirit? Is there is or is there ain't macro and micro matter?]Widely Differing Estimates Of The Amount Of Ordinary & Dark Matter & Energy In The Universe
1% to 5% visible ordinary matter. NAP states there is no evidence that the amount of ordinary matter today is different from day one of the universe. [Yet these same people say the universe is expanding, thus this must be due to dark matter, dark energy. Thus they expect the dark components of the universe to be responsible for the universe expanding even though they don't know much about those components. Meanwhile on the other hand, they do not suspect ordinary matter to be responsible for the universe expanding, despite claiming to know much about ordinary matter. Secondly to say ordinary matter has not changed is to suggest everything that is today was created in the one instant of big bang.] [A last note on an expanding universe. If matter and energy are neither created nor destroyed, then how does a universe expand?] 4.6% atoms.24% to 99%, 5x ordinary matter - dark matter.
65% to 71.6% dark energy.
1% to 5% is visible matter.
4% of the mass and energy in the universe is ordinary matter, the rest is in an unknown form per NAP. [This is contradicted in the same document that says ordinary matter exists in a significant amount. They then state a truth that “we are lacking a deep enough understanding of the laws of physics underlying our universe.”] See also, Per University of Texas, Per Cern Per National Radio Astronomy Observatory In the midst of thousands, getting paid to study matter and energy, there still seems to be willful ignorance and selective amnesia of statements such as matter is neither created nor destroyed and that matter is energy in a different form.
Per NAP, occasionally a science reaches a precipice—a juncture where all paths seem to lead to confusion. These crises often precede major conceptual breakthroughs. By any measure, cosmologists and physicists now find themselves in such a (wonderful) quandary. Their picture of the universe now requires a strange kind of dark energy with negative pressure, along with dark matter that is made of something other than the baryons that make up the stars and us.
