If you do not understand racism (white supremacy) and how it works, everything else you understand will only confuse you. - Neely Fuller

We need something to clarify everything for us, because we get confused...but if we use the concept of Asili, we will understand that whatever it is they are doing, whatever terms they use, however they come at you, you need to be thinking about what? How is this going to facilitate their power and help them to dominate me? -Marimba Ani

Tuesday, January 15, 2019

Two Great Sphinxes: Ghizeh & Babylon Egypt (Old Cairo)
Monumental Age Of Egypt
Unity Consciousness #1516

.

(Part 9ot of 11)

Each Kar is a circle unto itself and is also part of larger and smaller circles.
Kar is the circle, orbit, enclosure; “Ter” (or der) is all people who dwell in the Kar. (BB 217/229)
Most likely the word “world” is a form of the enclosure as karrt. We already know a star is a kar and planets are kars and stars are worlds.
We can almost see this better when we consider “der”as all the people. Un-der-world, o-ver-world, uni-ver-se. Same three worlds presented differently.
Akar the underworld is a world that contains inhabitants who live lives.
There is also a Kar that is the overworld we call heaven. This is also a world where citizens live lives.
The first inhabitants of all Kars are the elemental souls of life. In order for these souls of life to live full lives, they must travel full circle continuously. As shown in the previous message, one of the ways this was symbolized was through the Great Sphinx.

Kar Is Babylon

Kar is Kir is Qir. Qir is that which embraces and encloses such as a wall or a circle. This agrees with “Bab,” Bab also means the circle, enclosure, and to go round. In general, all forms of Kar are also forms of Bab. (BB 483/495)
Qir as Kher is also an ancient name of the city in Egypt formerly called Babylon and now called Old Cairo.
This is the location of one of two Great Sphinxes.

Great Sphinx at Babylon Egypt

Old Cairo is the southern portion of what is today called Cairo. Old Cairo is a form of Kar, kari, karo, karu, khar, kharu which goes back to the days of the mother and the masters of Kher. These are the seven elementals, the masters of the abyss of many waters manifesting as Kars, Khars, Akars, Neter-Kars.
See also, (Pinch: Handbook 14) for map of Egypt with a southern facing orientation.

Old Cairo was part of the gateway pathway of the gods (khuti, beauti). Old Cairo on the east side of the Nile was the place of exit* for the seven elemental powers who issued from the underworld. This leaves the Great Sphinx at Ghizeh on the west side of the Nile as the place of entrance into the underworld. (AE1 337/347)

The ancient road from Ghizeh to Old Cairo was considered sacred. The two Great Sphinxes were a miniature version of the two Great Equinoxes of the Great Year. They marked the western and eastern sides of the Great Year Kar Circle of the Sun's Revolution Around The Center of the Galaxy. (Brugsch-Bey: History of Egypt 514)

Kherkhau is another name given for Old Cairo (Babylon in Egypt). (Brugsch-Bey: History of Egypt, 201)

*Notes: In one instance, Massey states the gate of exit was in the eastern mount. This is Old Cairo on the east side of the Nile. In another instance, Massey states the gate of exit was in Leo (thus the Age of Leo at Vernal Equinox). This is Ghizeh on the west side of the Nile where the second of two Great Sphinxes, remains standing. These two instances are opposite orientations. Exiting in Old Cairo as east is a north facing orientation. Exiting in Ghizeh as east is a south facing orientation. (AE1 339/349)

Kar as an underground hole is called the Kil. Kil becomes cell becomes shrine becomes Kher. Kher is the Kha-Ru, or uterine outlet. Kha-ru seems close enough to Cairo. Therefore Cairo as the uterine outlet indicates birth and exit,

The Great Sphinxes are fundamental symbols of the seven elementals. Pretty much the entire mythology is based on these seven and the two truths and the one as parent. Do we really insist on thinking that after mythology was fully developed and after the seven elementals were held sacred for tens of thousands of years, it was not until recently that large symbols were constructed? If so we must also think those Africans also only recently acquired all the knowledge to create what they did. On an evolutionary scale and Great Year scale, 10920 BCE is recent. Do we really want to think a group of people went from the nothingness of prehistory to just cranking out monuments, creating paper, writing, hammers and chisels, math, agriculture, astronomy, clothing, housing and tons of other knowledge – everything all at once – and do so to perfection immediately? So let's build a Great Sphinx? What's a Sphinx? I don't know. Have you ever built one of those things you don't what they are? Nope, but I know how and I'm pretty sure with the help of everyone else who have never done this before, we can get it just right the first time. Where do we start? Let start at the end and work our way backwards. So does that mean we should wait? Yes, let's just wait until we get our first dynasty until we start working on building anything. So what do we do now? Crawl on all fours back into that hole and up that tree, I guess. (Pause and silence). You sleep yet! What do you want? When we get around to it, why don't we build two of them sphinx things? Why? I don't know, seems like two are better than one. Good idea. You got any extra bananas? What's that? Stop monkeying around, and toss me a bunch of them things we be always eating. All this sudden thinking's got me hungry. At least I think it's thinking. Can't be sure until those on the continent next door confirm it. I predict after we build those things, we's gon' finally become human. Oh yeah? Well I predict whenever dem cousins of yours find out, they gon' wanna be friends until they get what they want. Time will tell.

Another Clue Something's Very Wrong With The Date Assigned To The Great Sphinx At Ghizeh

Not only is something wrong with the date, but something is still very wrong with how inconsistent the information and claims made by other countries are that claim earlier time frames and originations that are clearly Africa's and African.
Quote from an Israeli newspaper: ”Despite its association with ancient Egypt, the sphinx imagery may have originated in prehistoric southern Turkey, going back to the dawn of modern civilization. The earliest sphinx statue, crude but sort of recognizable, was reported from the archaeological dig at Nevali Cori, and has been roughly dated to around 9,500 years of age [7482 BCE]. Nevali Cori is near Gobekli Tepe, the site famed the "earliest temple in the world".”
Not surprised by the Oh so many lies that still survive!
1. Prehistoric people in Turkey can originate and build a sphinx, but nowhere in prehistoric Africa, including prehistoric Egypt can people accomplish anything worth noting.
2. The date given to this sphinx, if accurate, only lends greater credence to the earlier antiquity of the Great Sphinxes in Africa.
3. Turkey as the site of the earlier temple in the world, is simply another ridiculous assertion.
4. The “dawn of modern civilization” would have to take place approximately 11,000 BCE coincident with the Great Year. In full disclosure of truth, this dawning does not and did not equate “modern” with new, improved, or better, but simply equates it to "different." Not different as in “completely.” but as in “the most recent variation of an accumulation of earlier manifestations.” The term “civilization” associated with the time frame of the past 11,000 years can only be loosely attributed, and then only in a constantly deteriorating sort of way. Due to our current level of understandings, the best synonym for “modern” is “current.”
5. Supposedly Turkey was so far ahead of Egypt Africa that it built the earliest sphinx and temple, yet did so without originating, language, the mythology of the sphinx or the astronomy, mathematics and other subject matter necessary to bring those things into existence. What the fooled believes is that fresh air comes from the Febreze, Renuzit, Lysol and Glade equivalents of artificial Asia-based histories.

References: BB; NG1; NG2; AE1; AE2

Brugsch-Bey, Henry, A History Of Egypt Under The Pharaohs Derived Entirely From The Monuments, Vol I, Second Edition, (London: 1881), Translated & Edited From German by Smith, Phillip