The answer has been widely known at least since the printing of bibles that detail various aspects of Jesus' life.
Even though the version of bibles we have today provide the weakest understandings regarding Jesus, these bibles are still enough for us to reach the essential truth of what Jesus would do in all circumstances, situations, conditions. (See also UC#1550)
In other words, one popular version of Jesus' life tells us Jesus would love God with all his heart, soul and mind, plus Jesus would love his neighbor the same as he loved himself.
In other words, Jesus, knowing he was God, would love himself in all forms divine, all forms human and all forms of creation.
This is echoed in most bibles, just stated differently, while the essence remains the same. Most people who teach from these bibles diminish the essence of truth, knowingly or not. The result is, despite us knowing what Jesus would do, this knowing has not been enough understanding to cause most of us to actually do what Jesus would do.
Our obeisance to the status quo nature of our societies is enough proof.
The places and times where we most need to do what Jesus would do, are the times and places where we've convinced ourselves is not a good time and place to do what Jesus would do.What Would Jesus Do has always been the question, even before the advent of humans. It was just stated differently by Jesus such as, “What am I going to do?”
What Would Jesus Do, is what Jesus has always done.
What Will Jesus Do Next, is what Jesus has always been doing. What good is the question and the answer, unless we understand we are always acting out the question and answer, or we are not, and that this dynamic is what causes the effects of the two truths to manifest more or less among humans, thus creating imbalances we call good and evil.
What Would Your Jesus Do? And....Will You Do It Too?
See also UC#1549Will you seek enough understandings to understand that you are a child of God, thus of the same genetics, thus a form of God, thus God? (See also UC#1304).
Will you then understand the responsibility of being God, and be the God that you are, by understanding the power of your genetic potential and applying it appropriately, in season, towards the two truths. (See also Ecclesiastes 3)
Thus will you be cold when it is time to be cold, hot when it is time and warm when it is time?
Speak out when it is time and be silent when it is time?
And so on, for all forms of the truth and for all capabilities of our potential.
Did Jesus only do the :right thing: on Sundays, Saturdays, in church, when not “at work” or when in a place where others said it was okay for Jesus to be Jesus? Did Jesus wait to say what needed to be said only when people wanted to hear it?
Jesus is always being Jesus. That's What Jesus Would Do.
Are you being the you that allows you to do what Jesus would do?
For Those Seeking the Fullness Of Truth, we continue by showing a small portion of expansion.
WWJD is the same as:What Would Jesus Do?
What Would Jehovah Do?
What Would Jah Do?
What Would Jahweh (Yahweh, Jahveh) Do?
What Would Jou (You) Do?
What Would Ra Do?
What Would Ar Do?
What Would Kar Do?
What Would Har Do?
What Would God Do?
What Would Ptah Do?
What Would Su Do?
What Would Messu (Messiu) Do?
What Would Hu Do?
What Would Shu Do?
What Would Khu Do?
What Would Bu Do?
What Would Buddha Do?
What Would Au Do?
What Would Atum (Atom, Adam, Aten) Do?
What Would Ma (Pa) Do?
What Would Ka Do?
What Would Ba Do?
What Would Brahma Do?
What Would Baal (B'Jah) Do?
What Would Kal-el Do?
What Would Karel Do?
What Would El-Shaddai Do? What Would Iu Do? By extension, this also becomes “What Would I in U Do?” and “What Would U in I Do?”
We ask questions and seek answers of self within. Then we do the same by asking questions and seeking answers of self without by asking each other because each is the other. Each is self in another form. Furthermore, the self within is an inward interview of the universal collective, whereas the self on the surface of our conscious understanding is the lesser self, while the self as viewed outside of self, is an outward interview of the universal collective. Both the collective extended self within and the collective extended self without must be used to bring the self in middle, into fullness of awareness, thus potential.
