To put this another way, our underestimations and over-estimations are showing. To say this another way, we are using portions of the 28 day moon cycle by using 4 weeks and 7 days, then we are using portions of the 30 day moon cycle by using 30 days, then we are using portions of the sun cycle by using 365 days, then we do not make continual adjustments based on celestial bodies that are reference stars. Instead. we dumb down time reckoning by nonsensically re-configuring the number of days to 31 in 7 months, 30 days in 4 months and 28-29 days in one month. Yet we say there are 52 weeks in the year of 7 days, but that only totals 364. This leaves an additional 1.25 to be fudged by making the number of days in a month a confusing mess, rather than having a 13th month of 5 to 5.25 days and keeping track of the stars as they rise/fall to indicate the four crossing points at the corners of the Great Year Circle.
Additionally the notion of 4 weeks, 7 days and 12 months only gives us 48 weeks, thus there actually is a 13th month that is hidden, shared and spread among the other 12 months. This we knew because any month with more than 4x7=28 days is a month with a partial 5th week.
Since we have 7 months with 3 extra days beyond 28, and 4 months with 2 extra days, this gives us an additional 29 days, thus 4 more weeks with 1 day left over. This is how 7x52=364 and this is how 12 months of 4 weeks totals 52 instead of conceptually 48 or 12 months with 4.33 weeks. Thus instead of taking the front door approach using 12 months of 30 days and 1 month of 5 days, we instead take the backdoor approach using 7 months of 31 days, 4 months of 30 days, 1 month of 28-29 days and 1 month of 29 days spread among 11 months. Good grief. It is this basic approach of disharmonious thinking that is prevalent across all subject areas in the education system of all societies. America is likely the worst since they have an added necessity to try to be different than the rest of the world in areas that would be beneficial and more efficient if we used the same methods of reckoning. Current science has little to no understanding of the Great Year as evidenced by the contradictory nature of information on NASA's website regarding pole star Polaris' revolution cycle and repeat appearance compared to the sun's revolution cycle.
It is a certainty when certain folks don't know, they give estimates of millions and billions of years, and then for variety, throw in light years and carbon dating. All this makes them seem precise, thus knowledgeable; however further investigation that seeks explanations for the estimations, are nowhere to be found in enough detail to know if they know. Following up on the previous message, NASA tells us the sun rotates faster at the equator and slower as we move toward the poles. Can different portions of a ball spin at several rates of speed? Earth can't. NASA says the sun is a ball of plasma and not rigid like Earth in its rotational speed. I say, even if the sun is more liquidy than Earth, in order for there to be multiple rates of rotation, different sections would have to spin independent of each other, yet remain dependent on each other, attached and functioning as a whole. What is the basis for NASA's assertions for the sun's varying levels of rotational speed? Using sunspots to measure the sun's rotation seems sketchy. Are there sunspots in all sections of the sun such that that method can be used from pole to pole? There must be, otherwise there is no way to tell what the varying rates are without a spot in all sections. So then, what happens when a straight line is connected from pole. It should pass through sunspots. If so, then what happens in 12 to 24 hours? What we should see is a jagged zigzag line connecting the same sunspots. However I'm not convinced, because if it is true that the plasma nature of the sun allows it to spin at multiple rates per latitude ranges, then that same fluid nature should cause the surface to change significantly enough to make it hard to identify the same sunspots. Perhaps not in 40 days. On one hand, I suspect NASA's sun rotation estimation are way off just like NASA's sun revolution orbit which is criminally negligent. On the other hand, there may be part of the answer that is close to accurate. That part being the estimate of the pole rotating in 30, 36, 38 days. These numbers are multiples of numbers related to cycles of moon, earth and pole star.
I further suspect the sun's shape to change kinda like the blobs inside a lava lamp or amoeba-like.
Lastly the same latitudinal properties that allow varying spin rates should allow for spin in at least two different directions at once. Perhaps the entire sun is rotating equally, however counter currents (rip currents) are slowing down some portions. Or perhaps its an optical illusion. If not, spin variation should alter the rate of orbit revolution' however it does not. The Great Year remains consistent.
Repeat Of Basic Definitions
A MOON is a Planet that revolves around another Planet.An EARTH is a Moon that revolves around another Moon.
A STAR is an element factory that revolves around another element factory.
A SUN is an Earth that revolves around another Earth.
A PLANET is a Star that revolves around another Star. In other words, A Moon is also an Earth, a Star, a Planet and an element factory. Same for all other celestial bodies. Celestial bodies are persons, people, humans, animals and organisms that live and breathe thus ingest, digest and outgest. This is true even for that which we call dust, particles, trash, garbage, junk, meteors, comets, asteroids, clouds....and so on. All of these things are the component building blocks, if not the whole of what we call moons, earths, stars and planets.
A moon-earth relationship, a solar system and a star constellation are the same thing in different sizes and complexities. See also “Backwards Reversed Motion of Time Clocks & Sun Cycles,” Unity Consciousness #878 Any message dealing with time and space OR time and motion OR time reckoning is useful expansion of this topic..
