(9azj of 11)
In a recent message fun was poked at believers in paper bag restraints as effective tools to hold back a virus.Another Analogy
However, paper bag restraints can be an effective tool to hold back our minds if we are conditioned through many repetitions to think paper bags are stronger than they really are. In this analogy, the paper bag is the popular media, mainly television news on FOX, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC and CBS. Of course this applies to similar behaving mass manipulation media by any name in other countries.These information dope pushers are themselves like paper bag restraints because they don't hold much water.
Yes they will hold a drop or two, but beyond that, most of the information these media present is artificially inseminated with corrupt weak-ass logic.
A source of information that does not hold water, is a source that does not hold the spirit logic fundamental to all life and existence. The information is disconnected and defective.
Media is useful to the extent they let us know a little bit of what's going on, even in the corrupted suboptimal way it presents information; however, media in no ways keeps us informed about the most important things going on. In many ways, media is cover chatter to keep our thoughts scattered so as to distract us from what is most important and help keep us from being able to correctly process information from many sources in the short-term and long-term.
A source of information that does not hold water, is a source that does not allow us to understand that water is not just water, but is everything, an ecosystem, a universe.
We are sleep walking around making decisions based on disjointed information that does not work well together.
We cannot know the difference between right and wrong, truth and lie, accurate and inaccurate if we don't consider more than one perspective, especially the counter perspective.
We cannot understand God without understanding Devil or know self without knowing all else (the extended self). We cannot know zero without knowing one or know the singular without the plural or the individual without the collective, and so on. However, we can believe in something without knowing its counterpoints or other points in the cycle viewed from the vantage point or points of advantage and disadvantage.