Achash + verosh is close to Nachash/Nahash . Nachash has been described above and in a separate message.
Verosh is close to Parosh. Parosh is one of the tribes that was in captivity in Babylon. Parosh is a chief and his tribe is listed first among those numbered. (Ezra 2, Nehemiah 10).
Parosh is also one of those who were sealed (made a new covenant with God) after being held captive by Nebuchadnezzar, King of Babylon. Then they went straight into Persian captivity. In order for the story to be more chronological, the book of Daniel should be between 2 Kings and Jeremiah. (Nehemiah 1:1, 7:6; 9-10; Esther 1:1) There is an Achashtare of (Ashur and Na'arah) of (Hezron & Abiah) of Pharez of (Judah & Tamar) of (Jacob Israel & Leah) (1 Chronicles 2; 4) So temporarily stated, the Persians are connected to Nachash to Ammon to Egypt Ethiopia. This is enough to know who they were and are but we can show this several ways. But first we have to take a side road to layout the climate of the times. This is not the beginning of the story. An earlier account starts in Genesis 14 and Judges 1. Before Achashverosh became King of Persia, there was a continuous fight for power among at least seven groups: (1) Egypt Ethiopia; (2) Rome; (3) Greece; (4) Israelite Canaanites (Hyksos); (5) Syrian Edomites; (6) Syrian Babylonian Chaldeans; (7) Assyrian Persians. Each of these groups succeeded for a while, but there is also always infighting within each group. Among the Israelites, this infighting started with Israel's first king, King Saul. Before Saul, the rulership of Israel and Canaan was established in the land known as Edom, but not established through the tribe of Esau Edom of Isaac & Rebecca. No, neither Edom, the land, nor Edom, the name, belongs to the lineage of Abraham. The name Edom, like many others was stolen and attached to Abraham's lineage, just as was the name Abraham and the name Israel. These names do not belong to one lineage of humans, but rather to all humans, as does the name “Jew.” An additional way of knowing this is by understanding that Edom is a form of Adam. Adam is a form of the first human who was female and male. Adam represents all humans, not just males. The name Adam was applied to males only, but incorrectly; however, the limited and non-harmonious use of genetic potential is necessary in order to create suboptimal logic. What also helps is understanding the JC Bible contains stories told in chronological disarray. What you read first in any chapter is not always what happened first.
This leads to the understanding that neither the world nor the land of Canaan was sitting around waiting on the lineage of Abraham before there was a King of Edom. No! Edom already had rulership and which did not include Esau Edom of the JC Bible.
When Abraham and Lot left Mesopotamia Babylonia Chaldea Aram, there was already a king or kings over the land of Canaan. We now fast forward a little to the time when the Moses led Hyksos Israelites were kicked out of Egypt and called it “the exodus.” At that time it appears Balaam of Beor was King of a significant portion of the “unpromised land” and he ruled from Mesopotamia (Deuteronomy 23). Balaam did not control all the land. Other kings were (1) over Edom, King Bela of Beor; (2) over Moab, King Balak of Zippor (Numbers 22); (3) over Midian, Amorite King Sihon. Moses killed King Sihon and the Amorites, who came out to stop the Israelites from trampling through his land like non-house-trained locusts. This was the first battle and victory for the Israelites, which must have been euphoric because the Israelites went on a killing spree. (Numbers 21, Deuteronomy 1). As a first encore, they killed King Og of Bashan, King Balaam of Persia, the King of Moab and the princes of Midian (Moses' in-laws) (Numbers 31:8, Joshua 13:21). As mentioned in the previous message, King Saul of Israel fought King Saul of Edom. David fought Hadadezer of Persia. David killed all the males in Edom to kill all heirs. Hadad escaped, went to Egypt for awhile, then, after David died, Hadad gained rulership in Damascus as King of Aram Syria. (1 Kings 11). David fought non-Iraelites and Israelites in order to maintain power. So did Solomon because neither were rightful heirs. Saul, David and Solomon were able to maintain control over all of Israel, but after that, there was always a King of Israel and a King of Judah or Israel or Judah or both were under the control of another group. Those particular Jews were divided and could not get along. Also, even within those two groups, there was infighting for power.
Pause For A Diatribe
So stop repeating the notorious lie that black people can't get along, can't work together, can't be unified. In the past 13,000 years, no group of people have been unified for very long. And when they were, it was a very limited form of unity and only to gain power from another group, then they immediately returned to infighting, not petty fighting, but to the extreme of backstabbing and murder and forming divisions among themselves, including religious divisions. This is true of white people, semites, asians, chinese, japanese, mexicans, and so on. All you have to do to see this is look through all your eyes. Listen to Kwame Toure, Malcom X, Marcus Garvey, Booker T. Washington, W.E.B. DuBois, John Henrik Clarke, Marimba Ani, Frances Cress-Welsing, Joy DeGruy and others who understand through So Dayi Eyes. For the Ages of Aquaria and Kepheus, these are the lineages of the mighty men and women, the warrior-heroes, the prophets, the priests, the queens and kings by any name.Who Are The Persians – Looking Through Marriage
All the people talked about since the beginning of this message are Persians. We now look through the curved lens of marriage. Ezra 10 is another super contradictory chapter. It says Adonai didn't like the Israelites marrying strange women so those they married in Babylon they had to send away along with the children. The tribe of Parosh was one of the tribes.1. Clearly, the Israelite women must have also taken strange husbands.
2. As restated in the previous message, most of Israel's most well-known and respected people, married “strange” spouses.
3. Ezra speaks of strange wives, yet in the next book, Esther, she herself becomes Queen of Persia, and she is still respected to this day.
4. All of the Israelites were the children of strange wives and husbands. The Israelites came from Babylon, Chaldea, Canaan, Egypt, etc. 5. Haran and Nahor were Persians, thus this leads across to Abraham and back to Moses. All those people listed as descendants of Shem, Ham and Japheth are Persians.
It is not your geographic location where you were born or where you lived or where you live now or where you claim citizenship, that makes you who you are. Geography is a suboptimal identifier when its significance is placed before genetics.Marriage and migration and differentiation and appellations do not change who you truly are.
All humans are Persians and Jews by virtue of our creation. Consider this, take an apple, grow it in Africa, then take the seeds and grow them anywhere else, call one a plum, one a cherry and one a peach, and still that apple is an apple by virtue of its genetics, even though its fullness and variability are misidentified.
Our naming an apple, an apple, by the way it looks, does not limit the genetics that formed that form, from forming another form.It's on us to understand what's in us.
Who Are The Persians – Looking Through Daniel
There is a slight spelling difference between Daniel and the son of Nebuchadnezzar.Belt’shatzar/Belteshazzar is Daniel.
Belshatzar/Belshazzar is the son of Nebuchadnezzar. This difference is smoke and mirrors to disguise the fact that Daniel and the son of the king of Babylon and the King of Babylon, are all forms of each other. This is exposed in at least the following verses.
1. (Daniel 4) Daniel and Nebuchadnezzar become the same person towards the end of the chapter, because it is Nebuchadnezzar speaking in first person and Daniel writing, calling himself Nebuchadnezzar. 2. (Daniel 5) Despite Nebuchadnezzar being restored to the throne at the end of Chapter 4, somehow Nebuchadnezzar's son, Belshazzar, becomes King of Babylon at the beginning of Chapter 5. Belshatzar, the son, then passes the kingship on to Belteshazzar (Daniel). Then Belshazzar the son is killed. By the way, even though he is King of Babylon, he is called King of Chaldea. Ezra 5:12 calls Nebuchadnezzar, a Chaldean. This, added with other verses, again confirms that Chaldeans and Babylonians are the same. Since Abraham was from Ur of Chaldea, then Abraham is a Babylonian. And since Nimrod and Asshur came out of the same land, then they are all the same, including Persians.
The story in Daniel 5 evidently starts in the third year of King Belshazzar, because even though he dies in Chapter 5, he is still alive in Chapter 8. The story, like most of the JC bible, is told in haphazard order, like a jigsaw puzzle where the pieces seem to match and you force them to fit. As you comprehend more of the puzzle, the errors become more obvious. 3. (Daniel 6 and 9) Rulership of Babylon and other lands passed on to Daryavesh/Darius, a Mede Persian, son of Achashverosh. The kingdom ranged from Egypt to Mede. It doesn't make sense for the son of Achashverosh to become king before Achashverosh himself. Likely the assassination of Belshazzar, was a takeover by the tribe of Medes. (Nehemiah 12:22' Daniel 6:1). Furthermore, Ezra 4:5 says Koresh Cyrus was King before Daryavesh Darius.
A Mede is from Media east of the Tigris. Mede and Media are not the same location as Medan or Midian.
The only way this really makes sense if for the events of Daniel to take place first under Nebuchadnezzar. Then Daryavesh Darius takes over, then Koresh Cyrus. Then the Book of Esther takes place under King Achashverosh, the father of Darius and Koresh. This makes sense if Daryavesh Darius is the prepubescent soul, Koresh Cyrus is the pubescent, and then Achashverosh is the father. Achasverosh is succeeded by Artach’shashta / Artaxerxes (Ezra 4) 4. Belshazzar, King of Babylon and King of Babylon, disappear after Daniel 8 and the kingdom passes to Koresh/Cyrus, a Persian in Chapter 10 who already had three (3) years under his belt. (pun intended). Koresh is Horus who was resurrected after three days, three years, thirty years, three hundred years, three thousand years. 5. (Ezra 1) This chapter confirms Koresh is Horus because Koresh, King of Persia is told by God, to go build a temple in Jerusalem, evidently for the Israelites. This is the same Koresh who has continued the captivity of the Israelites and threw Daniel in the lion's den. This is the same Adonai Lord God of the Jews who made Abraham his people, but decided to have pagans from Persia build the temple house of God. Why? Because the God of Abraham is a johnny-come-lately God, who could only rise by assuming the nature, power and possessions of what other Gods already had. Finally, the God of Abraham, after having a temple built by Solomon, decided to have the next one built by Persians? Why because these Persian temples (to Baal) were more original and included more symbolic understandings and because the Persians were God's people before Abraham was God's people. Thus the Persians were Jews before Abraham and crew. The Persians were Edomites and Israelites before there was an Esau or Jacob born of Isaac & Rebecca. Why? Because Abraham is simply a later version of Persian.
Just as the Egyptians were a later version of Ethiopian. And this is also why the Egyptians kept going back to Ethiopia and partly why the Ethiopians kept taking over Egypt to try to set the house of God back in order. To add to this story, while the Israelites were building the house of God, their enemies came and asked if they could help because they had also been worshiping the same God. How crazy is that? Then Zerubbabel and the elders of Israel said, no you can't help because we have NOTHING in common. How crazy is that? Especially from someone with the name Zerubbabel (An Israelite named after confusion and named after Babylon). This story of temple building is as non-credible as the Tower of Babel as an explanation for why humans speak different languages. (Ezra 4) We must always ask basic questions as a means of double-checking. Why would enemies of Israel want to help them build a temple? I know what the bible says, but why would they? Just because they worship the same God? No, that has not been enough to not make them enemies anymore. It only makes sense if the main difference was not them thinking they had a different heritage or worshiped a different God, but rather the main difference was human frailty of seeking power and understanding without the responsibility of the rights that come with it or the effort and resources sacrificed to achieve it.
Another basic question is why would supposedly decent folks such as the Israelites say they had nothing in common with people who said the worshiped the same God, who is the same God who wants everyone to worship him? Clearly worshiping the same God as those who persecute you with racism, is not enough. The JC bible story makes more sense if Israelites wanted to claim credit for building a temple and city such as Jerusalem on their own, when instead, they did not because it was a joint effort of multiple tribes who were not Israelites, and were likely tribes ranging from at least the area between the Nile Valley and Tigris-Euphrates Valley. We can simply believe words on paper in one book, or we can consult multiple books or we can consult several other ways of knowing, or we can do all three? Which way is likely to be more reliable?How many times has that strong believable feeling of love turned out to not match reality?
Who Are The Persians – Looking Through Haman
Haman was a Persian leader under King Achashverosh, when the Israelites were slaves again in Persia in Shushan.Haman was made leader over all the officers of King Achashverosh/Ahasuerus. (Esther 3) Haman of Hamdata of Agagi....of Amalek of (Eliphaz & Timna, concubine) (1 Samuel 15:8)
Eliphaz of (Esau & Adah)
Timnah/Timna as female is of Seir the Horite (Genesis 36), (1 Chronicles 1:39)
Timnah as male is of Esau (1 Chronicles 1:51)
Esau of (Isaac & Rebecca)
Adah of Eilon the Hittite. (Genesis 36:2)
According to the JC bible, everybody came from Noah. Everybody came from Adam & Eve.
How are we not the same? Haman was an Esau Edomite Amalekite Horite Chaldean Hittite Persian Jew from the Garden of Eden.
We continue to the next section to show another way of knowing.
Is Haman A Form of Heman?
1. King Saul spared the life of Agag, King of the Amalekites (Edomites). Then Judge Prophet Temple Guard Samuel killed Agag. 2. Then Samuel's lineage gave rebirth to Agag through : Heman of Joel of Shemuel/Samuel of (Elkanah & Hannah) of Jeroham of Eliel of Toah of Zuph[related to Zoph, Suph, Suf] of Elkanah of Mahath of Amasai of Elkanah of Joel of Azariah of Zephaniah of Tahath of Assir of Ebiasaph of Korah of Izhar of Kohath of Levi of (Jacob & Leah) (1 Chronicles 6), (2 Chronicles 29:14) 3. Heman of (Mahol & Zerah, likely a form of Zeruiah) of (Judah & Tamar) of (Jacob Israel & Leah) of (Isaac & Rebecca) of (Abraham & Sarah) (1 Chronicles 2), (1 Kings 4:31) 4. (Hori, Hemam/Homam) of Lotan of Seir the Horite (Genesis 36), (1 Chronicles 1:39) 5. Hemam/Homam are reborn as Haman, then Haman is reborn through Levi and Judah6. Haman, the Persian Jew, is an earlier form of the Israelite Jew.
IT is less about US as humans, and more about the truth (ter-it) as superhuman.
