To seek a cure for something you don't understand is the approach of the suboptimal context.
This is why we can also succinctly state, the cause of cancer is the suboptimal context which relies on a lack of understanding.
We can put this in other words and state, the cause of cancer is the lack of knowledge of self and all else. This lack of understanding is what keeps the suboptimal context thriving.
Only a reversal of any of the statements above can cure cancer.
Only a reversal of less understanding for more understanding can lead to the cure for cancer.
Only a reversal of death logic brings forth life logic, thus the cure for cancer is in the cure for the suboptimal context.
Cancer is real in one form and in many forms.
We have to quickly move to the comprehensive definition of cancer which includes all metaphors of that which is caused by lack of understanding. In other words, cancer exists physically, mentally, emotionally and spiritually.
This is why the cure for cancer has been delayed, because the cure seekers on parade, do not approach the cure for cancer this way. Are they seeking to cure emotional cancer? Mental cancer? Spiritual cancer? Cancer in the environment? Cancer in school books? Cancer in laws? Cancer in religion? And on and on everywhere. In the same fifth minute mentioned above, Dr. DeGruy also says, “ the worst thing you can do to a people is to rob them of the memory of themselves.”
We, the people of the world, have been robbed of the memory of our health. We think the large dependence on medication, health professionals, facilities and insurance are the components of optimal health. Under this mindset, we are sucked further into sickness by cure seekers draining collective resources by invoking emotionalism to get people to donate money so they can keep their jobs and keep people distracted waiting on deliverance that will never come down this path.
There is no such thing as a cure for cancer that comes in the form of a pill, liquid or injection accompanied by a warning label for your protection about side effects (the different ways the cure can harm you).
Under our current medical and health philosophy, is there any medication or treatment that has zero side effects? The acceptance and pursuit of the cure under this context mimics the drunken dancer who feels sober-minded because he and death are in step. You don't have to rely on what I say, take it from nature all around you. Learn more about how other creatures stay healthy. If that approach is undesirable, then take it from your boy Albert Einstein who believed in the intrinsic connectedness of all things and that part of our problem is living in the illusion of disconnect. (min 14:15) So I partially restate what has been stated in many places elsewhere.
Cancer is a collective manifestation. There is no cure for cancer that targets individuals, or certain body parts or that targets the physical only. You cannot cure cancer without, for instance, also curing mental illness. Therefore the cure for cancer is as basic as “let food be your medicine.” We can substitute to arrive at “let nutrition be your cure.” These statements are sufficient metaphors to serve as the mission statement that guides any approach towards finding the cure for cancer. If that approach does not include all aspects of societal culture, then the cure will be delayed because the society itself is developmentally delayed. In the absence of approaching the cure for cancer the optimal way, human societies will continue to suffer in the same way as “Colony Collapse Disorder.” First we sicken everything else, then we are sickened further. In the absence of the larger collective heading in the optimal direction, every individual can significantly reduce incidences of cancers in their lives by changing logic.
07.02.19 Update
If it were possible to find “A Cure” as a single thing to give to people, then you have to know what the single thing is that causes cancer. Then if we knew that, all we would have to do is reduce, change or eliminate our interaction with that one thing. Secondly in order to find a cure you must understand the cause, which is obviously, I hope, what the curists are looking for. However, in order to find the cause, all you do is study the effects.Obviously there is an enormous disconnect between the long chain of causes and effects that result in a single manifestation, then results again in a variation of that manifestation, and keeps manifesting in various forms.
Even if we limited our thinking to the physical, we must get down to the fundamental understanding of how the physical functions in order to understand how to repair it. Therefore, if we are not looking at cellular malfunction as synonymous with cancer, then we're looking in the wrong place trying to find something not there.
If we simply reviewed and investigated our messy methodology (broken thought processes), we'd be closer to finding a cure for cancer. Fixing the context is the first step to curing cancer.
