(9azzzzzzzzzza of 11)
This is yet another foray into language as an overall concept.Words, along with sticks and stones, do hurt. Obviously. They can also help. Obviously.
Early Africans built language based on the natural world. Every letter meant many things and so did every combination. These letters and combinations all have a common origin and meanings. Thus you could say a word, write a word or hear a word and know the meanings. You didn't need separate definitions to explain. The word was the definition. All this was consistent across all disciplines of knowledge.
This is not true in recent uses of language that we use as a prideful part of our identity, especially American English speakers for whom it is their primary, and usually only, language. In keeping with everything else American, English has to be the worst of all languages, made out to be the best of all.
Only by going back and fetching the early African languages can we escape the confines of English and all other languages in use, even current versions of languages in Africa. This is why, in all languages in current use, we say, hear or read words, but have no idea of the meaning based on letter construction, the letter formulation, the word spell-ing. This was not the case in much earlier times. This is why clueless people who are the colorless people of no color, try to keep everyone else clueless by their confused use of language and concocted definitions. They try to go back to the Latin as a partial source of English, not understanding that Latin is an African language at root, trunk and branch as is English.
Most word etymologies of English words will reference an origin of PIE ( Proto-Indo-European). This is an attempt to use PIE to hide all African origins of language.
According to Etymonline.com, PIE ( Proto-Indo-European) is the hypothetical reconstructed ancestral language of the Indo-European family. The time scale of the "language" itself is much debated, but a recent date proposed for it is about 5,500 years ago. [This definition is filled with parts that should make you say, “what?”]
Furthermore, Indo-European is explained as being coined in 1814 as a combination of Indo- + European (Common to India and Europe).An article on English and Proto-Indo-European on researchgate.net, a site that holds itself up as a premier content provider, does not use the word Africa, Africa, Egypt, Egyptian, Coptic, Aethiopia, Ethiopia, Nile, Cush, Kush, Chaldea, Kasdim, Hebrew, Israel, Roman, Arab but does use Latin, Greek, Sanskrit, Saxon, Hittite. This alone tells you everything you need to know about the intent and content.
An article on harvard.edu states:The Indo-European language family comprises most of the modern languages of Europe as well as many languages spoken to the east, such as the Indic and Iranian languages of Asia. Indo-European has been the object of linguistic study since the early 19th century, when early scholars established the main goals of the field: 1) to describe and explain the historical development of languages belonging to its ten branches (Indo-Iranian, Greek, Anatolian, Tocharian, Italic, Celtic, Germanic, Balto-Slavic, Armenian, Albanian), and 2) to reconstruct Proto-Indo-European (PIE), a prehistoric "proto-language" ancestral to all these branches.According to georgetown.edu, Proto Indo-European (PIE) is the name given to a hypothetical prehistoric language, which would have been the ancestor of all known Indo-European languages. Historical linguists try to reconstruct PIE word forms (or proto forms) by comparing related words in different languages and positing a common ancestor form from which the attested forms can best be explained. These proto forms...are only postulated and not attested. While some think PIE was actually spoken at some time (perhaps in the 4th or 5th millenium BC), others are less sure such a uniform language ever existed, and prefer to regard proto-forms as useful abstractions which describe the relationships between related languages.
[In other words, Proto Indo-European is made up shit to try to shift emphasis from African origins they don't want to admit, and would rather instead use a bunch of hogwash words, called scholarship, to trick people. This is how deeply strange, estranged, deranged from home, most people are, thus a world of illnesses where the suboptimal use of genetic potential is glorified, thus the suboptimal as last has replaced the optimal as first.]Remember, Europeans, Asians and their diaspora's, have tried to relegate Africa and all of it's diaspora's to the prehistoric age. Thus, they have falsely portrayed prehistoric as less intelligent and less civilized than the very recent times when white Europeans and lighter Asians arrived out of natural processes affecting darker humans we call Africans.
To repeat, PIE ( Proto-Indo-European) is an attempt to divide the language pie to create a great abyss crevasse divide to hide all African origins of language, thus to also hide what recent humans consider a cornerstone of their superior intelligence, thus again, why English is promoted as the standard language. And it is. The standard language of suboptimization. Be certain to understand that almost all other languages currently in use, are guilty of the same.For newly reborn spirits into this dimension, learning language in any society is like getting CPR from someone who is on an oxygen machine. Whether or not the person uses their lungs or the oxygen machine to revive you, they tell you that oxygen is Indo-European oxygen that comes from a Proto Indo-European form of oxygen not connected to the oxygen in Africa.
It's like some 21-year old fool, who has lived away from home for a year, claiming their language has an earlier origin, but has nothing to do with the home they grew up in, but rather comes from some nebulous nowhere place difficult to ascertain and even harder to explain..
