Reincarnation, Scary Like Climate Change | DefinitionUnity Consciousness #1658

.

(Part 9sd of 11)

This is a brief introductory discussion of the topic of reincarnation.

For some reason, when I think of reincarnation, I immediately see the faces of people who get scared at the mention of the word.
I grew up programmed into Baptist Christian thinking and have found some of the scariest people (those most easily scared) of their own existence, are Christians by any denomination.
The narrowness of the Christian ideology sets people up for being scared by anything that expresses the expansiveness of spirit-soul as it already manifests in each person and all creations.

Basic Reincarnation

Everything repeats, everything recycles. Same goes for spirit-soul. Why? Because everything is a form of spirit-soul.
Incarnation simply means bring forth, create, be born.

We enter this life already having gone through countless reincarnations.
Egg and sperm are reincarnated into a fertilized egg. Then reincarnated into a fetus. Then reincarnated as many parts are built and specialized, then reincarnated as puberty begins and so on do many reincarnations take place.

There are two basic types of reincarnation:
1. Into the same form.
2. Into a different form.

Seeds are a basic example of reincarnation into the same form. This is why, early on, all creations begin forming seeds.
Your heartbeat is reincarnated each time it performs its one-two cycle.
We know cells are reincarnated continuously.
We are reincarnated in more ways than we can shake a stick at. Think about how your body, mind, emotions, spirit, thoughts, actions are reincarnated frequently.
Everything that repeats any type of cycle is a reincarnation.

Reincarnation does not mean a human disappearing or dying, and then appearing again, being reborn just as they were when they left this place.

Think of things outside of yourself and how they are reincarnated, the plants, rain, seasons, clothing styles.
Then come back and open up to the notion of reincarnation as all-encompassing and applying to all things.
When you take container that food comes in, and then use it to store something, you have just reincarnated the function, but not the form. In other words, reincarnation is not just limited to form, it applies to all things in existence that any and all creations do.

Water is the reincarnation of hydrogen and oxygen.
Solid food is the result of many reincarnation of many things. When we eat it, reincarnation continues called digestion and nutrition as that food becomes integrated into our cells to become part of us and continue their incarnation as reincarnations in us. Thus, as we know, we are, in order to stay alive, dependent on reincarnation.
Birth and death are reincarnations.
To celebrate your birthday or any other anniversary or holiday is a form of celebrating reincarnation.

Eternal life is not a one-off one-time process. Eternal life depends on endless reincarnations. This describes the life of God. God cannot exist for long without reincarnation and neither can anything else.
All day every day we are all caught up inextricably in the mix of gazillions of reincarnations.
Where there is an incarnation, there is reincarnation.

Until we grasp the fundamental nature of reincarnation I don't think it's possible to understand whether or not humans come back as humans or as animals or if the same person comes back remembering who they were before.

Climate Reincarnation

If we were taught properly, we'd understand climate change coincides with the changing of Ages.
By necessity of the reincarnations of star constellations, our context and definitions had to be sub-optimized. Currently we pretty much understand one side of the two truths through a glass darkly. For instance, we understand the finite, but not the infinite, thus then, in reality, neither do we understand the finite. And this is why we are unable to see infinite reincarnations in our finite bodies and everywhere else in this finite world. This causes us to comprehend reincarnation in a very limited way and be scared of it, despite we ourselves being epitomes of reincarnation. Thus we exhibit the proverbial behavior of being scared of our own shadow powers despite the ever-presence of our shadow powers.

Resurrection means reincarnation. Jesus didn't reincarnate just for human souls but for spirit-soul in all forms in all creations because Jesus is not an exclusive representation of humans, but rather of Ra, the Holy Spirit who is right now reincarnating the Age of Pisces into Aquaria and also reincarnating the Age of Wepwawet into Kepheus. Same thing, different form, different function, same need incentive.

All transformation is reincarnation. All change is reincarnation.
Although we've been made sick of hearing about climate change because of the ways its been explained and because we don't understand it and don't want to think we need to change, climate change is still a large scale form of reincarnation of spirit-soul. This change is not just taking place out there in the environment in regards to temperature, but is taking place in all creations in this portion of the Galaxy, thus the entire Universe, are and is transforming into rebirths of themselves in order to change the climate of conditions that genetic potential must deal with.
Thus we could call climate change, “Climate Reincarnation.”

No Harm, No Foul, My Prerogative Checks OutUnity Consciousness #1657

.

(Part 9sc of 11)

We have been trained to think we are a responsible person while allowing ourselves to behave as if we had no responsibility.

In the absence of self-correction analysis and resistance to critical thinking, self-reflection and self-assessment, we most often end up in the same place. That place being a conclusion that “it's my prerogative, so what's it to you?” This mostly corrupt logic has been discussed, mainly in relation to “to each his own.”

The only way there can be no harm to our thinking is if there is no foul by our behavior.

The only way there can be no harm is if there is no fouled up logic.

Check yourself.
Check each piece of logic against that which you consider to be the highest topmost, most important ideology you have.
Part of being responsible is continuously checking our own logic. This includes the thousands of pieces of logic of others we accept or reject. This inspection process is part of what it means to “check yourself before you wreck yourself.”

Gibeon, Abdon & Jehiel | Always Multiple Connections & TribesUnity Consciousness #1656.

(Part 9sb of 11)

Gibeon

Gibeon of Ye‘i’el/Jehiel and Ma'akah/Maachah...of Benjamin Jehiel could also be Hillel. (1 Chronicles 9)

Gibeon was located in the land of Benjamin. (Joshua 21:17)

Abdon

Avdon/Abdon of Hillel, a Pirathonite of Pirathon in Ephraim of the tribe of Joseph & Asenath. (Judges 12:13-15), (2 Chronicles 27:14)

(Abdon, Zur, Kish, Baal, Ner, Nadab, Gedor, Ahio, (Zeker, Zechariah), Mikloth father of (Shim’ah, Shim’am)/(Shimeah, Shimeam)) of (Jehiel & Maachah)....of Benjamin (1 Chronicles 8: 29-30; 9: 35-36). Gibeon not listed as a son.

Abdon, a head of one of the families of the tribe of Benjamin living in Jerusalem. (1 Chronicles 8:23)

Abdon of Micah (2 Chronicles 34:20)

Abdon was a city in the land of Asher. (Joshua 21:10)

Abdon of Shashak of Beriah of Elpaal of (Shaharaim & Hushim) of tribe of Benjamin (1 Chronicles 8). Shashak is a form of Shishak, King of Egypt. (1 Kings 11:40)

Abdi and Abdiel are forms of Abdon and also forms of Apti and Aptu, the pool of truths, the birthplace of water and life.

Jehiel

(Shama, Jehiel) of Hothan the Aroerite of Gad And/Or Reuben (1 Chronicles 11:44), (Numbers 32:34), (Deuteronomy 3:12)

Levites of the second degree: Shemiramoth, Jehiel, Unni, Eliab, Benaiah, Maaseiah, Mattithiah, Elipheleh (1 Chronicles 15:18)

Yechi’eli/Jehieli of Laadan the Gershonite of Levi (1 Chronicles 23:8; 26:21)

Yechi’el/Jehiel the son of Hachmoni [group name not father's] (1 Chronicles 27:32)
Yashov'am/Jashobeam is also a Hachmoni. (1 Chronicles 11:11). A review of his name in the CJB reveals at least two forms: Yashov'am and Yashuv. These become Jashobeam and Jashub in the KJV. All are Israelites, thus so are the Hachmoni. (Numbers 26:24; 1 Chronicles 7:1; 12:6-7; Ezra 10:9)

(Jehoram, Azariah, Yechi’el/Jehiel, Zechariah, Azariah, Michael, Shephatiah) of Jehoshaphat, King of Israel (2 Chronicles 21:1-2). This Jehiel is too young to be father of Kish father of Saul.

(Yechi’el/Jehiel, Shimei) of Heman of Joel of Shemuel/Samuel of (Elkanah & Hannah) of Jeroham of Eliel of Toah of Zuph of Elkanah of Mahath of Amasai of Elkanah of Joel of Azariah of Zephaniah of Tahath of Assir of Ebiasaph of Korah of Izhar of Kohath of Levi (1 Chronicles 6), (2 Chronicles 29:14)

(Maaseiah, Elijah, Shemaiah, Jehiel, Uzziah) of Harim... of Levi (Ezra 10:21)

Obadiah of Jehiel of Joab...of Pahathmoab Jehiel is of Elam and of Levi. (Ezra 2:6; 8:9; 10)

Shechaniah of ( Mattaniah, Zechariah, Jehiel, Abdi, Jeremoth, Eliah) of (Zechariah, Jediael, Zebadiah, Jathniel, of Elam, Jehohanan, Elioenai) of Meshelemiah of Kore of Asaph ...of Levi This Jehiel comes after the time of King Saul. (Ezra 10), 1 Chronicles 26)

Jehoshuah of Non/Nun of Elishama of Ammihud of Laadan of Tahan of Telah of Resheph of Beriah of Ephraim of Joseph & Asenath (1 Chronicles 7: 23-27)

Seek And You Shall Find, Ask And You Shall AnswerUnity Consciousness #1655

.

(Part 9sa of 11)

Somebody's out there asking. Somebody's in there answering.
Somebody's in there asking. Somebody's out there answering.

No one's afraid to ask, when they don't have to answer.
No one's afraid to answer when they don't have to ask.
We have become comfortable allowing someone else to do one or the other for us, thus we only do one or the other.

To do both the asking and answering involves critical thinking.
We must bring the two back together for ourselves as we recheck our logic.

Such a process is the beginning of the cure for the cancers of cancer.

Someone's Gonna Price Cost Comparison Hop, Unity Consciousness #1632

Zero Sense | God Is The Universe And Being Afraid To Say SoUnity Consciousness #1654

.

(Part 9rz of 11)

Supposedly God is the Creator of Everything and everything that exists is supposed to be God, yet we are afraid to call God, “The Universe.”
But when things happen in nature, we don't hesitate to call them “Acts Of God.”
A lot of these “Acts” are taking place on Earth, yet, we are afraid to refer to “The Earth” as God. (But somehow in our confusion, we refer to Earth as Mother Earth or Father Earth, but are afraid to refer to God that way – Mother Universe, Father Universe.

Asking More About These “Acts”

How are these “Acts of God” getting to the Earth in order to take place on Earth?

Does God just take a spiritual laser beam from God Central somewhere out there in Heaven Above, and send it to Earth whenever God wants to perform an Act of God?

Or are Acts of God caused by the natural processes of Earth and Solar System and Galaxy and Universe?
Best we can tell, it's the natural world, through processes, that is the manifestor of “Acts of God.” (We are the witnesses. Thus we continuously go from “God is my witness” to being “witnesses of God, Acts of God.” Yet we only partially testify to the truth. We call the Acts “of God” but we do not call the manifestor, God.)

If natural processes are the actions that are the Acts of God, and these acts take place through Earth, then God must be the Earth performing the Actions called Acts of God.

Now we check on our progress.
If God is Earth, then most certainly God must also be Universe, since Universe is larger than Earth.

As Dr. Ben would somewhat say, I'm trying to keep this real simple for us and talk in whatever way is necessary to help us understand. Like Yosef, son of Jochannan, I'm talking real plain everyday conversation self street talk to help us keep it real with ourselves, instead of each side of our brain, kidding the other. - partly because we've been taught we are either left-brained or right-brained (another false notion already addressed, undressed and redressed).

Okay, some of us might continue on our “eat, drink and be merry” way, and say, it's the Spirit of God or the Holy Spirit or the Holy Ghost that performs or causes Acts of God. (we are still very afraid to call God, “The Earth” or “The Universe.”)

Since logic up to this point has not helped much, we have to change up a bit and continue our self-conversation from a different perspective and ask, “where does this Spirit of God live who causes Acts of God?” (We are asking because we must somehow think God is a separate being from Earth and separate from Universe. Earth is one thing, God is another. Universe is one thing, God is another. We don't bother to reconcile logic, we just compile it, and keep piling it up.)

So the question is, where does the Spirit of God live, the spirit that causes Acts of God?
Inside the Earth or outside the Earth?
Inside the Universe or outside the Universe?
If we say outside, then where is that?

If we say inside, then where is that?

And who created that place and space, wherever it is?

If you do not say God created it, you shouldn't be calling yourself a child of God and you shouldn't be thinking God is All This, That, The Other and Everything.

This reminds us of something, so we now take another turn to what has been discussed before.
By saying we are a child of God, we are essentially calling ourselves God.
How so?
Because a child must be of the same type as the parent. The same formulation.

Gods don't give birth to humans that are not gods.
Likewise then, since humans are creations, then Gods don't give birth to creations that are not gods.
Thus, since God created Heaven, Earth and Universe, then those three are also gods and God....and so are we.

Furthermore, immortals don't give birth to mortals unless those immortals are also mortals and unless those mortals have a way of again becoming immortal. Upon this rock of ages, the church is rebuilt.

Let's Get Serious

How can we continue to espouse logic talking about things “universal” and “spiritual,” yet we have not yet remembered that when we say those things we are talking about God.
Therefore if to speak of the spiritual is to speak of God, then God is Spirit. We know this and are not afraid to refer to God as Spirit or Ghost or something else similar.
However, we must keep the same logic by saying, if to speak of the universal is to speak of God, then God is the Universe.

God Is Afraid

Why?
Because God knows the power of genetic potential properly applied, it can create Creation and Universe.
Thus God is afraid of genetic potential improperly applied due to lack of understanding, because it can destroy Creation and Universe.
God is afraid of not knowing.

God is afraid of not knowing self and all else.
God is afraid of not knowing the dynamics of dynamic balance.
Why?
Because God is everything, thus God needs to understand self and everything else in order to make this thing work.

And this is why, if we are to grow back into our full potential from gods (prepubescent mortal) to Gods (pubescent immortal), we must do the same thing as God by going through the continuous process of becoming one again in our understandings of the many.

Using Love & Fear To See Things Clearer In These Mirrors

You can't have a God who talks about love, and then that God, not be the same as Love.
You can't have a God who talks about the fear of God or the fear of the Lord, and then that God not understand fear. Thus God would have had to experience fear. God is Fear.
This reasoning of the co-existence of two truths can be carried out to anything you can think of, and it will apply.

For now, we come back to say, you can't have a God who created the universe, and then that God not be the same as The Universe.
You can't have an Earth that is a Mother and Father who regenerates rebirth of life, and that Earth Mother and Earth Father, who is our Rebirth Parent, not be a form of God,The Birth Parent. Through Earth we are reborn as children of God, and through Earth, Acts of God are also reborn. Not just those of a large, miraculous or disastrous kind, but all actions of Earth and its contents (inhabitants) are Acts of God. There's more but we stop there, for now.

How Can It Be True That God IS NOT The Universe?

To say or think God is not the universe, is only true in the limited genocidal sense. two of the things that make the limited sense possible and plausible are lack of understanding and fear. These two are a volatile cocktail that continuously serves up mixed up think.

---

Even God Is Scared Of Self, And This Is Why We, The Lesser Knowers, Are Still Afraid, So Afraid

Based on our logic that is afraid to call God, Universe or Earth, we must also think, since God created Heaven and Earth, and God is not Earth, then God is also not Heaven.
Yet we do think God is the Word, and the Light.
What Word is God? The words we speak, the words in bibles?
If so, aren't these words smaller than the words that created Earth, Heaven and Universe?
If God is the word and God spoke using words to create Earth, Heaven and Universe, and God is the same as the Word, then isn't God also the same as Heaven, Earth and Universe?
Slightly rephrased, if Word created Earth, then Earth is Word. A thing is what creates it. Now since Word is God, then Earth must be God, since Earth is Word. And so must be Universe, Heaven and all else, since Word was used to create all things. All things must be God.
God is the Tree. Talk to the tree if it pleases you, but don't miss opportunities to have conversations with God because of fear of the form God is in.

Sufficient unto the day are the choices we make with logic and chances we take with logic that agrees more with the partial than the whole.

I'll retake my choices and remake my chances with that which agrees more with the whole than the partial.
The superhuman is a greater portion of the whole than the human.
A more self-serving context because it is more self-preserving because it makes zero sense to a fuller extent.

In Retrospect

This entire message is simply to repeat the essence of what was said in the three discussions of “Who Is The Creator?”
It is better to be connected to a name of God that keeps us consciously aware of the nature of God, self, each other and all else, rather than be connected to a name of God that only serves to connect us to human-delineated religions.
Logic flowing from the context of God as Universe is more apt to harmonize our thinking and behavior, rather than the separatist thinking and behavior that goes along with all these names of God claimed as an identifier of a specific human-made cock-eyed religion.
God is the Creator-Destroyer of the Universe. God is the Universe who creates and destroys. This is more holistic than God is Jesus, Allah or Jehovah or Buddha, because those names cause us to think God is different and we are different, when that has never been fundamentally true. Once again, if humans have everything in common with plants and other animals, then we most certainly are the same, no matter our human names and other “suboptimal identifiers of self.”
We have allowed surface differences of how we look, where we live and ways of living to become sources of deadly, maddening sickening pride because it doesn't even allow us to interact with the natural world properly. We need to start over and strip away all the human constructions by resetting to optimal theory, not the death-supplying American Dream, the leader of the unfree world.

Be certain to understand that all of our specific names for God, do indeed mean that God is the Universe, it's just that we have not been taught that. As a result, because we are not even starting out with an all-inclusive comprehensive understanding of God, then most of our ideologies in religion and elsewhere in life, suffer from endless debilitating forms of fragmentation disease, just like a computer that receives zero maintenance. The computer is always getting hung up on its own logic, and can't become more efficient without junk logic being removed, errors being corrected and being reset (rebooted, restarted). Same metaform is Different metaphor. Which is what God the Universe is yelling us. God is the Universe filled with everything different, yet God is the same, thus everything is the same, thus everything is everything.

”Miracle of the Maafa” (Introducing Dr. Chike Akua with Professor Kaba Hiawatha Kamene)

Maachah Or Maacah, Israelites Before The IsraelitesUnity Consciousness #1653

.

(Part 9ry of 11)

Michal, David's wife

Micha daughter of (Saul and Ahinoam)...of Benjamin. (1 Chronicles 8:33-34)
(Ahinoam, Azariah) of (Ahimaaz & Basmath) of Zadok of Ahitub of Amariah of Azariah of Meraioth of Zerahiah of Uzzi of Bukki of Abishua of Phinehas of Eleazar (priest in Shiloh) of (Aaron the chief priest & Elisheba) of (Amram & Jochebed, his aunt) of Kohath of Levi of (Jacob Israel & Leah) (2 Samuel 15), (1 Chronicles 6), (1 Kings 4)

Maacah, David's wife

In the form of Ma‘akhah/(Maacah, Maachah) she is mother of Absalom who is the father of a daughter named Ma‘akhah/Maachah. (2 Samuel 3), (1 Chronicles 3; 2 Chronicles 11:20)
Maacah/Maachah, David's wife, is the daughter of King Talmai of Geshur Syria. Maacah is a form of Michal, daughter of King Saul. (UC#1612) Both of these are the wife of King David. Michal is the older firstborn twin through Leah, the older sister and wife of Jacob Israel. Maacah is the younger twin through Rachel, the younger sister and wife of Jacob Israel.

Talmai of Ammihud of Laadan of Tahan of Telah of Resheph of Beriah of Ephraim of of (Joseph & Asenath) of Jacob Israel (& Rachel). Add this to the statement above to understand King Talmai is an Israelite and a Syrian.

The great nephew of Talmai is Jehoshuah/Jeshua/Yeshua/Joshua of Non/Nin/Nun of (Elishama, Talmai) of Ammihud. Jehoshuah is a form of Joshua, leader of Israel and the same as Jesus, who is also leader of Israel. (UC#474)

(Sheber, Tirhanah, Shaaph, father of Madmannah, Sheva (likely Sheba), father of Machbenah, and ?? the father of Gibea; the daughter of Caleb was Achsa) of (Caleb & Maachah, concubine)....of Judah (1 Chronicles 2:48-50)

(Tebah, Gaham, Thahash, Maachah) of (Nahor & Reumah concubine) of Terah (Genesis 22)

(Makhir/Machir, Maachah) of (Manasseh & concubine from Aram/Syria; Ephraim) of (Joseph & Asenath) (1 Chronicles 7:15)

(Hanan, one of the warrior-heroes) of Maachah... likely of Benjamin (1 Chronicles 8; 11)

Shephatiah of Maachah....of Simeon (1 Chronicles 27:16)

(Abijah, Attai, Ziza, Shelomith) of (Rehoboam & Maachah, daughter of Absalom) of (Solomon & Naamah an Ammonitess of Lot's lineage)...of Judah. Rehoboam loved Maachah most. (2 Chronicles 11)

Those Named Maachah Or Maacah Existed Before The Israelites And Are The Israelites

Nevertheless the children of Israel expelled not the Geshurites, nor the Maachathites: but the Geshurites and the Maachathites dwell among the Israelites until this day. (Joshua 13:13; Deuteronomy 3:14)

Eliphelet of Ahasbai, of the Maachathite, Eliam the son of Ahithophel the Gilonite, (2 Samuel 23:34)

King Maachah of Gath. (1 Kings 2:39)

There is also a King Ma‘akhah/Maacah who was alive during time of David, but fought against David. This is unlikely to be the same as King Talmai, even though the Geshur and Maachah are often listed closely together. (2 Samuel 10:6)

All Maachah's or Maachahs have earlier roots outside of Canaan and before Abraham, yet Maachahs and Maacahs are all in the mix of Israelite lineages. Thus the Israelites are one and the same as Maachah (Syrians), Aram-Ma‘akhah/Syrianmaachah, Maachathi and Maachathites and other names not spelled as such. (2 Samuel 10:8, 1 Chronicles 19:6)

Female Michal Reborn | Retelling Her StoryUnity Consciousness #1652

.

(Part 9rx of 11)

Many stories to retell that have been told.
We continue telling the story about Michal and all related forms.
The ancestry genealogy lineages of the superhuman, precisely detail the ancestry genealogy lineages of humans.
Then once we take the human back to more complete understandings of sign language submerged in our spoken and written languages, then we shall also find the ancestry genealogy lineages of all else.

Mikhah Micah, the co-conspirator against Samson, had some self-made holy items and a hired Levite priest. The Danites took what Mikhah had made and took his priest. The Danites then went to Laish/Layish, a city with quiet trusting people. The Danites considered the city easy-pickings, thus attacked, killed the people and burned down the city, under the justification that the Danites needed land because they had not been given any. Truth is, the Danites were afraid to fight other Canaanites for the land so they found an easier fight with people who just wanted to be left alone. (Judges 18-19)

Joshua 19:47 says: “The territory of the descendants of Dan was too small for them, so the descendants of Dan went up and fought against Leshem, captured it, defeated it by the sword, took possession of it and lived there, calling Leshem “Dan” after Dan their ancestor.” [Leshem/Leshem is the same as Layish/Laish in Chapter 18 which both chapters together explain the real reason the Danites attacked the people of Layish]

Connecting to Michal

Per the previous message, Mikhal/Michal is King Saul's daughter who became David's wife. After Saul and David “fell out of love,” David went on the run. King Saul took Michal out of David's house and gave her to a person called Laish, to be his wife.
It's more than possible that Laish is not a person. Since Gallim is likely a form of Galilee, the story of Michal is telling us how the superhuman moves from place to place and merges with others as star constellations move around the galaxy. Thus Michal was sent to Palti/Phalti/Phaltiel who lived in Laish of Galilee. Palti is also not a human, but instead, like Michal is an elemental soul of life forming the connections that created and maintain the universe. (1 Samuel 25:44)

The Plot Thickens Via A Micha Connection

King Saul's son, Jonathan, had a son Mephibosheth. Because Jonathan loved King David as his own soul and helped David, after Saul died and when David became King, he took Mephibosheth and treated him like a son. Jonathan was already dead along with (Yishvi, Ish-Boshet/Ishui, Ishbosheth) and the sons of the house of Saul. (2 Samuel 9).
Mephibosheth had a son Micha. Mephibosheth had been staying in the house of Machir, the son of Ammiel, in Lodebar. Ammiel is the father of Bathsheba, thus King David's father-in-law. Ammiel is also the father of Machir. Machir of Ammiel is the male version of Michal of Saul, who is also of Ammiel, since Saul is of Benjamin who is Benammi. (2 Samuel 9; 17:27)

Now when it comes to Mephibosheth, the son of David, David did not turn Mephibosheth over to the Gibeonites so they could kill him as part of a blood payment as discussed in UC#1648.
Instead, David gave the Gibeonites another Mephibosheth who was of (King Saul & Rizpah the daughter of Aiah who is called Saul's concubine). (2 Samuel 21 7-8)
We now have enough clues to sort this out.
After Saul died, Abner, who is also related to Saul, took Rizpah. Abner and Saul are forms of each other. This is why the lineages of Saul and Abner are mixed and cross over. To also repeat, the two Mephibosheths are also forms of each other, as are Micha the son of Mephibosheth and Michal the daughter of Saul and Michael who we are familiar with in the form of the archangel, and to Ishmael who is also Michael. (2 Samuel 3:7)
This then provides further clarification of the severely incomplete truth that Ishmael is the father of Arabs who are a a group of people in Asia and who are not Jews. Ishmael is the ever-coming one who is the father of all humans. All of us are Arabs and Jews. This has already been shown, but more ways of knowing will follow.

We must continue to ask who's telling the story?

Also who is the story being told about?

Transformations Of Micah, Much More Than A ProphetUnity Consciousness #1651

.

(Part 9rw of 11)

Most of this section extracted from UC#1611 and UC#1612

Variations of Micah: Michah, Micaiah, Michaiah, Michael, Michal, Maacah, Maachah, Mikhay'hu, Mikhayah, Mikhah, Mikha, Mikha’el, Mikhal, Ishmael

Micah, a Morasthite. This is the Prophet-Priest-Oracle Reader who wrote the Book of Micah. “Morashet” is closer to Mareshah in the KJV. Micah possibly of (Judah & Tamar) and/or (Judah & Bat-Shua) and/or tribe of Benjamin and/or tribe of Issachar.

In the astronomical prophecy of the Book of Micah, the Manifestor/Messiah was to be born in Bethlehem-Ephratah; and it was through this announcement that the chief priests and scribes were able to tell Herod where the child should be born. The Hebrew Messiah was to be born in Bethlehem-Ephratah because the birthplace above was localized in that city of Judea, the land of the solar birthplace in the sign of the Fishes (Age of Pisces). And so the Christ that was born in heaven was landed on earth as the fish in place of the Lamb. (NG2 394)

Forms of Micah

1. A prophet Micaiah of Imla/Imlah (1 Kings 23:8), (2 Chronicles 18:7) This prophet existed during reigns of King Ahab of Israel and King Jehoshaphat of Judah.

2. Nehusta of Elnathan of Achbor of Mikhayah/Michaiah of Gemariah of Shaphan ….of Levi (2 Kings 22:12; 24:8), (Jeremiah 26:22; 36:11)

3. (Azrikam, Bocheru, Ishmael, Sheariah, Obadiah, Hanan) of (Azel, Eshek) of Eleasah of Rafah/Rapha of Binea of Moza of (Alemeth, Azmaveth, Zimri) of (Yho'adah, Ya'ra)/(Jehoadah, Jarah) of (Pithon, Melech, Tarea, Ahaz) of Mikhah/Micah of Meribbaal of (Y'honatan/Jonathan, (Yishvi, Ish-Boshet)/(Ishui, Ishbosheth), (Malkishua/Melchishua, Malchishua), Avinadav/Abinadab, Eshba`al/Eshbaal, Merav/Merab, Mikhal/Michal) of (Sha'ul/Saul & Ahinoam) of Kish of (Abiel and/or Ner)...of tribe of Benjamin (1 Samuel 14; 2 Samuel 2; 1 Chronicles 8; 9), (Acts 13:21). Saul is called Kush in Psalm 7:1 CJB only.

4. Beerah of Baal of Reaia of Micah of Shimei of Gog of Shemaiah of Joel (Joel is likely Joseph in 1 Chronicles 5:2). Beerah, prince of Reubenites, whom Tilgathpilneser, King of Ashur Assyria carried away. (1 Chronicles 5). Although 1 Chronicles 5 seems to indicate this lineage could be of Simeon and/or Judah, it is not Simeon based on Numbers 26. An investigation of Reaia, Shimei and Joel did not clear things up.

5. Zechariah of Jonathan of Shemaiah of Mattaniah of (Mikha, Mikhayah)/(Michaiah, Micah) of (Zikhri, Zakur)/(Zaccur, Zichri) of Asaph ..of Levi (Nehemiah 12:35)

Uzzi of Bani of Hashabiah of Mattaniah of Mikha/Micha of Zabdi of Asaph...of Levi (Nehemiah 11:17-22)

6. (Michah, Isshiah) of Uzziel.....of Aaron (& Elisheba) of Amram (& Jochebed) of Kohath of Levi (1 Chronicles 24)

(Micah, Jesiah) of Uzziel....of Levi (1 Chronicles 23)

7. Michal daughter of (Saul & Ahinoam) of Kish of Abiel of Zeror of Bechorath of Aphiah... of tribe of Benjamin (1 Samuel 9; 14:51; 14:49)

8. See UC#1612 and upcoming post for Michaiah/Maachah/Maacah

9. See UC#1648 for Michael/Mikha’el and Michal/Mikhal

10. See UC#1647 for Ishmael and upcoming posts containing greater detail.

More To The Story Regarding A Male Person Named Micah Micaiah

Samson was a Nazarite of the tribe of Dan. After he set fire to the corn of the Philistines and killed some Philistines, the Philistines came into Judah, which they controlled, and turned up their oppressor pressure. The people of Judah were furious with Samson of the tribe of Dan, for bringing the wrath of the Philistines upon them, because things were going just fine while they were enslaved, so why upset the oppressors. So the enslaved Judaens themselves, pulled out their Judas-type thinking, and conspired with Delilah and the Philistines against Samson in order to self-preserve their own self-destruction that was slow and easy compared to death by kicking against the pricks. The Judaeans cooned. Likely one of the conspirators was Micah, an Ephrathite in the land of Ephraim in the land of Judah. His name is Mikhay'hu and Mikhah in the CJB version of the same chapter. Mikhay'hu is sometimes translated as Micaiah and Mikhah is translated as Micah. Both are the same person.

Before, during and for a while after the time of Samson, there were judges, but no King in Israel, so everyone did right in their own eyes per Judges 17:6. However later writers of the story inserted the next judge after Samson was Phinehas who is so old, he was alive when Moses was.
Phinehas of Eli/Eleazar (priest in Shiloh) of (Aaron & Elisheba, daughter of Amminadab) of Amram (& Jochebed) of Kohath of Levi (Exodus 6, Genesis 35), (1 Samuel 4, 14, 22, 30), (2 Samuel 15), (1 Kings 2:27)
Elisheba's Lineage: Elisheba of Amminadab of Ram of Hezron of Pharez of Judah (& Tamar). (Exodus 6:23)

Based on the unlikely age relationship of Phinehas to reality, this lineage is either fabricated or it represents superhumans.

Micah returned eleven hundred pieces of silver to his mother that he had stolen from his mother, which was the same amount each co-conspirator paid to have Samson tricked. His mother says the money is cursed. She takes some of it and has a graven image made, despite God's supposed distaste for graven images. Micah then makes other items and consecrates his son as priest. Judges 17:7 claims there was a Levite who was also of the tribe of Judah. Micah then pays this Levite to be the priest in the house of God that Micah owns. Meanwhile the tribe of Dan was looking for land because supposedly they had not been given any. This is contrary to what Joshua 19 says about the tribe of Dan being given land.

There is some kind of connection between this Micah and Micah of the Book of Micah. There is also a connection to Machiah and Maachah. There is also a connection to Maka and Makhu and IA and IAHU and YAHU and KA already discussed.

What is most likely is that the Micah in this story is the same as Micah the prophet. Thus Micah the prophet is also a traitor of Samson. It doesn't matter what office you hold or job or position or title, people are still people and are subject to and capable of any behavior that any human does. You don't become a saint, trustworthy and a good person by becoming a police officer or judge or doctor or professor, or lawyer, etc. or because you took an oath. No! Your spirit-soul takes an oath in Hades as part of the deal of transforming reborn into this human form. Recognition of this oath via being in tune with the urgings of spirit is what causes us to more strongly pursue the rights of creation or fight against it. This is true whether that pursuit for or fight against is well-known publicly revealed or privately hidden in the background. It is these two groups that are on the front lines battlegrounds for justice/injustice, moreso than those in the middle with the muddled huddled masses whose logic is more driven by the naivete of numbers and by oaths, covenants, promises and allegiances formed and taken after assuming human form. Thus this middleman logic supports the status quo no matter how justified as personally beneficial.

The JC bible story about Micah provides the conclusions about Micah that I am pointing out. The JC bible tells us Micah owns a house of God, makes ritual items, consecrates his son as priest, then pays a Levite to be priest and father, but is then said to treat the priest as his son. Can just anybody consecrate anybody as priest? And can just anybody own a house of God. Just setup shop in their own house? Which the house of God and Micah's house were the same place. And how can those graven images and ritual items be sacred and how can that Levite, a priest be anointed priest by a non-Levite? And why would a legit Levite put up with this and do so on the basis of “getting paid.” This story is typical of the unbelievable that becomes believable through the magic witchcraft sorcery of Blam Alam applied by new school Jews and Christians, that get us to have faith in thought processes that rely on Baalim Elam elimination of critical concentration.

Under the black light of scrutiny that exposes what's hidden in plain sight, this story does not make sense as a story about humans. It makes sense if Micah is the owner, thus ruler of the house of God in Shiloh above. Thus Micah is a form of Michael, the high priest ever-coming one who is always changing forms and changing names and changing locations from which these transformations are administered (added and ministered). May the Lord add a blessing to the reading of his word and sanctify it in our hearts. Amen, Ashe, Yebo, Nananana.

Feedback Survey Says: Efficiency In A Deficiency ContextUnity Consciousness #1650

.

(Part 9rv of 11)

Let's assume we live in a world where genderism and racism are not everywhere in 247,365.ways.
We still have a major problem. An efficiency problem that leads to inefficiency. Further inefficiency is created by using a primary approach and an intermittent approach that specifically asks for feedback.

First Example

It is counterproductive, thus less efficient, for companies or government agencies to send out surveys periodically or send emails after you've interacted with them, or ask you to answer some questions at the end of a phone call or cause messages to pop-up on websites asking for feedback.
Why does this approach create more deficiency?
Because the guiding context is deficient.
If any person or company or agency understood the process of becoming, they would also understand the process of becoming more efficient. Thus the pursuit of efficiency would be continuous as a part of everything. Thus we would self-assess more by remaining always conscious of the feedback we are getting through all forms of interaction with every customer, citizen, vendor, employee, friend.

Feedback is always being given, even if we don't call it by that name.
Self-checking is the most efficient way to overcome deficiencies.
Most approaches are deluded forms of self-stroking lipservice to our own ego to help us feel good that we're doing something and trying, while aiming at the wrong end of the target.

Here's a part of the double conundrum that comes from an approach that specifically asks for feedback as if feedback is something different and separate from anything that takes place when we interact.
For instance, when I call and tell you I've been waiting a long time. That's feedback. Anytime I call you for any reason is feedback. Any form of communication by fax, email, letter or in-person is feedback.
My experience has been, when you specifically point out that you are giving feedback or suggestions, that most of that information doesn't go any further, and if it does, whoever touches it next, finds a way to dismiss it, then the company turns around and asks for feedback.

This forces us to judge the preponderance of evidence to be that most requests for feedback are intentionally disingenuous in order to placate dissatisfaction and redirect attention. We are efficient at that.
But every now and then an individual or company will surprise us and actually quickly make a change for the better.

Second Example. This One Further Expands The Context Of Efficiency

Relatively speaking, it is easier to meet a person of the opposite gender and have sex with them, than it is to become their friend and not have sex with them.
We must improve our relationships with each other, but can't until we improve relationship with self, such that body, mind, emotion and spirit have a better relationship inside us. But this can't happen as an island ideology. In order to become more efficient with the different aspects of self, we must simultaneously have a better relationship with the natural world. Of course humans are a part of the natural world. If we are having trouble relating to people, then perhaps we should go back to the teachers, the rest of the natural world., then come back and doublecheck our relationship with self, then with other humans, especially on a human to human basis and not based on any other relationship we have or think we might have with that human. This approach must be continuous. In other words, more to the root of the problem of why we use a fragmented disconnected approach in attempts to become more efficient, is because we do the same thing with ourselves in understanding the continuous feedback we are receiving from body, spirit, mind and emotion. This lack of self-awareness translates outside of self, into the home and into our workplaces and thus we have a very deficient approach to becoming more efficient. A clear example is when our interaction with the other gender becomes deficient when gender infuses too much into the thought process. This then becomes out of balance with the rest of self. And this is why, however, it's easier to be out of balance with a person and have sex with them, and harder to be in balance with a person of the opposite sex and be their friend and not never ever have sex.

Going back to the first example, so then the problem with companies is they they pursue an imbalanced sexual relationship with those they interact with by seeking the limited benefits they want. When instead they should be seeking the friend approach and listen more, especially to those calls they say they're always recording. Companies and all those listed in the first example , if they truly seek efficiency, must reset their context and truly have the person's best interests in mind rather than always setting them up to be used for profit. That's essentially the same as being logically drugged and date raped.

The Need For Efficiency Must Be In Tune With The Incentive To Be Efficient

Without the need incentive, we will fall short of efficiency.

In an environment where feedback is treated as a separate item with suggestion boxes, comment cards, rating systems and all other sorts of contrivances, the mindset of everyone involved becomes numbed down waiting to be stimulated and awakened to make a Pavlovian response when called upon for comments, feedback, suggestions, etc.

The kind of efficiency we need comes from improving harmony with the whole. There is no efficiency that does not perform better in relation to the whole. Any efficiency otherwise obtained, must create unsustainable deficiencies, which, until corrected, beget more and more deficiencies, until we begin seeking to improve the deficiencies of deficiencies without awareness of the larger causal deficiency.

It is self-defeatingly counterproductive to get caught up in a personal culture, family culture, community culture, workplace culture, religious culture, member of sports team culture or country culture to the point that knowledge and use of the specific language used in that culture overrides the ability to understand language common to all. Instead specific cultural language becomes more of an ego-tripping opiate that causes anyone who doesn't speak that language to be considered as not knowing what they're talking about. Efficiency is not culture specific and neither is knowledge; however how information is understood is. Thus most people and places have a lot of information but don't understand how to use it for lack of knowledge. This lack starts from a misplaced context and a need disconnected from the appropriate unifying incentive.

It is simply not possible to be more efficient in a healthier way, when our driving ideologies are incompatible, incongruent, disharmonious with each other. When this is our status quo, it is only possible to be more efficient in an unhealthy way.
In others word, as we already know, it is possible to get better and be better at something, and as we do, we are making things worse overall.

Lastly, as discussed elsewhere, one of our main subcontexts we must straighten out is our confusion regarding maximizing and optimizing.
To use a public example, Serena Williams has within her a conflict between her understandings of the role the concepts of optimizing and maximizing are having in her quest for more championships. This is not a denigration of her in anyway, but is used so perhaps we can look at Serena and then through her, see ourselves as individuals and as twos, threes, organizations, businesses, communities, towns, villages, counties, states, prefectures, districts, provinces, countries, humans and creations. It is not possible to maximize everything and also optimize.
We are all spirit transformations having all sorts of continuous relations in concert with the Circle. This Circle being the model and epitome of efficiency which has allowed it to maintain the efficiency of Preexistence despite the inefficiency of Existence, especially inefficiency caused when the wielding of free will becomes unwieldy because too many pieces of logic float under their own authority.

The solution is the problem reconfigured. We must unify our consciousness of the many until we again see the many as one, that is, if we seek efficiency that leads to life and not the efficiency that leads to death.
Efficiency starts with each person, their context and their topmost need incentive. Until we resume the process of becoming one, we won't be able to truly understand ourselves, thus not be able to truly understand much else, thus not understand how to become more efficient.

We love to claim we know ourselves, but, based on the productions of our collective thinking and behavior, we have somehow become convinced we are closer to perfection than we've ever been as humans. Thus, we say to ourselves, as long we keep doing mainly and mostly what we are doing, and throw in a few pieces of feedback now and then, we should be okay and able to stay on the right track. The feedback to that mindset is, if it ain't broke (not in need of fixing), why even tinker with it?

Hell Is Named After Jesus & Mother MaryUnity Consciousness #1649

.

(Part 9ru of 11)

Jesus is the Sun of God. God is the Universe that gave birth to the Sun.
The Sun God is Helios or abbreviated as Heli or Hel, thus Hell.
Or Heli is spelled Hiel. Hiel can be pronounced Hell and then spelled that way.
(See also AE1, BB 61,488 for Kar, Shade, Hades, Hell or search this weblog.)

The neter-kar is the abyss of the lake of fire that we all must enter. Out of this pool of fiery truth, some souls rise purified. Some do not and sink deeper into the lake, through the wormhole and into the lower abyss. This is Hell.

Hell is also an abbreviation of Hellen, the abyss as mother and nurse.
Thus we have hill as high and hell as low. Same word at root. See above.

Hades is Amenta, the underworld. The lowest part of Hades is Hell, the lowest of the low reserved for the lowest of the low.
Hades is a good place, a rebirthplace for souls. Our souls were born in Hades in the waters of Nun, which is why we return to Hades to be born again. Being baptized or christened is a symbolic ritual of coming out of the waters of Nun, which are the waters of womb, which are the mother's waters that break and the child comes forth. This takes place in Hades.

Heaven Above Is The Same As Heaven Below

We humans are simply living in a split-screen perception that heaven above is different from heaven below. If we insist there is a difference, then we must also acknowledge that Heaven Above is more similar to Heaven Below, than Heaven Above is to Earth.
Why is this so?
One way this is true is because we can live in Heaven Above and in Heaven Below in the same form, but we can't live in either in the form we are in on Earth.

Following the lead of Amen-Ma, the Sun must go to Hell and go through Hellfire in order to be resurrected. And so must every spirit-soul.

Archangel Mikha'el Michael, Ruling Prince Of PersiaUnity Consciousness #1648

.

(Part 9rt of 11)

Mikha’el is one of the ruling angels who fought a battle in heaven against the dragon and the dragon's angels. (Jude 1:9), (Revelation 12:7)
Michael is the Age of the Jackal that had to use tension pressure to take the throne from the Age of Draco the Dragon.
See the messages on Har-Magedon or Armageddon.

And an angel came down unto me
In her hands she holds the very key
- - (“7” Prince)

Michael Is One Of Seven Elementals

As discussed elsewhere the seven elemental souls of life are lord, kings, angels and more. We find them in the JC bible as:

Michael, Meshullam, Sheba, Jorai, Jachan, Zia, Heber, seven...of the tribe of Gad (1 Chronicles 5:13)

The seven above are the sons of the following eight: Abihail of Huri of Jaroah of Gilead of Michael of Jeshishai of Jahdo of Buz...of Gad; And/Or of (Nahor & Milcah); And/Or of Manasseh of (Joseph & Asenath) (Judges 10), (Numbers 32:41), (Deuteronomy 3:14) (1 Chronicles 5), (Genesis 22:21)

(Jehoram, Azariah, Jehiel, Zechariah, Azariah, Michael, Shephatiah) of Jehoshaphat, king of Israel of Asa of Abia/Abijam of Rehoboam & Maachah) of Solomon (& Naamah an Ammonitess of Lot's lineage)...of Judah (1 Chronicles 3:10-12), (2 Kings 8:24) (2 Chronicles 21:1-2)

Adnah, Jozabad, Jediael, Michael, Jozabad, Elihu, Zilthai, captains of the thousands that were of Manasseh of Joseph & Asenath. These seven helped David when he was running from King Saul. David is number eight as King of Kings, Lord of Lords. (1 Chronicles 12:20)

(Y'honatan/Jonathan, (Yishvi, Ish-Boshet)/(Ishui, Ishbosheth), (Malkishua/Melchishua, Malchishua), Avinadav/Abinadab, Eshba`al/Eshbaal, Merav/Merab, Mikhal/Michal) of (Sha'ul/Saul & Ahinoam) of Kish of (Abiel and/or Ner)...of tribe of Benjamin (1 Samuel 14; 2 Samuel 2; 1 Chronicles 8; 9)

After Joshua and them killed a whole bunch of Canaanites, the Hivite Gibeonites surrendered without a fight in order to save their lives. They preferred being slaves to death. This land was given to the tribe of Benjamin, then to the Aaronite Levites. Later on, after Saul died, David became King of Judah while (Yishvi, Ish-Boshet/Ishui, Ishbosheth) became King of Israel. The two sides had a meeting in Gibeon and both sides had plotted to kill the other. A battle took place and some people of Gibeon were also killed. King David won. Later there was a famine in Judah & Israel and David was told it was because Saul's family, the tribe of Benjamin slew the Gibeonites. In order to lift the curse on the land, David asked the Gibeonites what they wanted in order to set things right. They asked for the blood of seven sons of the tribe of Benjamin. So David took the two sons of Rizpah the daughter of Aiah, whom she bare unto Saul, Armoni and Mephibosheth; and the five sons of Michal the daughter of Saul, whom she brought up for Adriel the son of Barzillai the Meholathite. And he delivered them into the hands of the Gibeonites, and they hanged them in the hill before the Lord: and they fell all seven together. (Joshua 21; 2 Samuel 2; 21:7-9)

All seven and we watch them fall
- - (“7” Prince)

A Michael Rarely Talked About In Connection With Daniel

Daniel is speaking and says:
“But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days: but, lo, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me; and I remained there with the kings of Persia. But I will shew thee that which is noted in the scripture of truth: and there is none that holdeth with me in these things, but Michael your prince. And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people.” (Daniel 10; 12)

It doesn't matter whether or not Daniel is talking about an angel in spirit, an angel in person or a human. Daniel is still referring to Michael as a Prince of Persia, above and below, superhuman and human. Daniel had help from a Persian who is referred to as an angel of the Lord. We already know that all humans are angels for both the Lord of Light and Lord of Darkness. In what ways and to what degree we support darkness or lightness is the difference.

If nothing else, let us be certain to understand that Persia exists above and below and in the middle. Persia is not limited to the area in and around Mesopotamia. Earth is Persia and so is the Universe.
One way to innerstand this is through Perseus,

Michael Above Before Michael Below

Michael is the British (Druid Egyptian) form of Tum or Har-Makhu. As a result, Michael represents many things. One of those is judge of the dead. His tool is the scales called Makhu or Makha. Makhu-EL or Makha-EL Lord of the Scales. The larger scales is the double equinox of spring and Autumn. (NG1 364)

See mention of the autumn equinox festival called Michaelmas at https://writerswhirlpool.blogspot.com/2019/05/easter-origin-definition-meanings-unity-1575.html

As discussed many times in the form of Horus, Michael is one of the seven and also eighth as the ever-coming one composite of the seven. This was first symbolized above in the circumpolar constellations. There were likely first noted in the south, but now we refer to the seven northern circumpolar constellations. Each constellation rules the Great Year for approximately 3,703 years. In other words, Michael was the Dragon Draco, then Wepwawet the Jackal, then Kepheus, the Lion and Dog-faced Ape.
All this connects us to Ishmael as a form of Michael (ichmael).
Since Michael is the ever-coming one, Michael is Jesus is the Messiah, Christ, Savior and so on. Michael is RA the Holy Spirit.

Michael is also a ruler, god, angel, spirit, power or truth of one of the four winds, corners or quarters, two of which are the equinoxes.
In the Book of Enoch, Michael is named as one of four great angels, along with Raphael, Gabriel and Phanuel. Also named as Michael, Gabriel, Azrael and Israfel (NG1 410), (BB 287), (Churrchward: Origin 21)

More Of The Same Michael Manifesting By The Same Name In Different Positions (Roles, Functions)

In addition to the lineages listed above, Michael appears in many other lineages in the JC Bible. For now we are only able to list the most obvious. Many others exist and will be listed under other headings, and in fact, many have already.

(Ahio, Shashak, Jeremoth, Zebadiah, Arad, Ader, Michael, Ispah, Joha) of (Beriah, Jobab, Misham) of Elpaal of (Shaharaim & Hushim) ...of Benjamin (1 Chronicles 8)

(Zechariah, Jediael, Zebadiah, Jathniel, Elam, Jehohanan, Elioenai ) of Shelemiah/Meshelemiah of Kore of (Asaph, who stood on right hand of his brother Heman) of Berachiah of Shimea of Michael of Baaseiah of Malchiah of Ethn (likely Etzni also)i of Zerah of Adaiah of Ethan of Zimmah of Shimei of Jahath of Gershom of Levi (1 Chronicles 6:39). Even though Asaph and Heman are called brothers, they have different lineages that lead back to Levi. Gershom is also of Moses.

Omri of (Michael, Obadiah, Joel, Ishiah) of Izrahiah of Uzzi of Tola of Issachar (1 Chronicles 7; 27)

S'tur/Sethur of Mikha’el/Michael....of Asher. One of those sent to reconnoiter (spy out) the land before attacking the Canaanites. (Numbers 13:13) S'tur is K'tur.

Zebadiah of Michael of Shephatiah (Ezra 8:8)

One Of Many Feminine Forms Of Michael

Mikhal/Michal of (Sha'ul/Saul & Ahinoam) of Kish of (Abiel and/or Ner) of Zeror of Bechorath of Aphiah...of tribe of Benjamin Michal loved David and became his wife. David gave 200 or 100 Philistine foreskins as bride price. Just as some of the male Michael's listed above, Michal protected David by helping him escape her father. (1 Samuel 9; 14; 18; 2 Samuel 3)

When David went on the run from Saul, Saul gave Michal his daughter, David's wife, to Phalti (Phaltiel) of Laish... from Gallim. Gallim is possibly Galil, an area along both sides of the Jordan in which multiple tribes lived, including Canaanites; And/Or could connect to tribe of Dan; And/Or the Zidonian Canaanites. (1 Samuel 25; 2 Samuel 3), (Judges 18:7, 29), (Genesis 10:15). See all instances of Palti below.
Michal saw David dancing naked and acting a fool and she despised him. David essentially cursed her out. As a result, Mikhal is said to have no children. If she was human and had two husbands, this is unlikely. But her nephew comes to her rescue in 2 Samuel 9 (2 Samuel 6)
Mikha/Micha of Mephibosheth of Jonathan of (Saul & Ahinoam)...of Benjamin. Michal is reborn as Micha. (2 Samuel 9)
But wait, Michal did have children. Five sons of Michal of Saul, whom she brought up for Adriel of Barzillai the Meholathite. Barzillai is a Gileadite from Rogelim. For Gilead connection to three tribes, see subheading above: “Michael Is One Of Seven.” :(2 Samuel 21:8). Michal's older sister was supposed to be David's wife but Saul gave Merab to Adriel. Michal become wet-nurse for her sister's children. This shows that Merab and Michal are twins (same person, two different characters or stages), plus based on 1 Samuel 18, David and Jonathan are also a twin soul.
Finally we must remember that Saul loved David also because David killed one of the Goliaths threatening to take back the promise of the unpromised land.

Bottom Line: Michael, like Jesus, like Horus, like Ishmael, manifests all over the place geographically and in place names and people names and in gender and in all forms of the two truths, even when divided into three or more. This is the nature of the ever-coming one, spirit-soul. Michael is the Age of Aquaria/Aquarius (Michal out front revealed/Michael behind hidden in plain sight).

All forms of creation that have ever-existed, still exist today, revealed and hidden.

Additional Lineages

Palti of (Rafu, Rafa)/(Raphu, Rapha) of Benjamin. One of those sent to reconnoiter (spy out) the land before attacking the Canaanites. (Numbers 13:13), (1 Chronicles 8). Same name as Michal's second husband. Also same as Refa'im/Rephaim (supposedly giant Canaanites relative to non-giant Israelite Abrahamite Terahites). Also same as Raphael, thus same as Michael. Rapha is the Repa, the Repa-tition.

(Azrikam, Bocheru, Ishmael, Sheariah, Obadiah, Hanan) of (Azel, Eshek) of Eleasah of Rafah/Rapha of Binea of Moza of (Alemeth, Azmaveth, Zimri) of (Yho'adah, Ya'ra)/(Jehoadah, Jarah) of (Pithon, Melech, Tarea, Ahaz) of Mikhah/Micah of Meribbaal of (Y'honatan/Jonathan, (Yishvi, Ish-Boshet)/(Ishui, Ishbosheth), (Malkishua/Melchishua, Malchishua), Avinadav/Abinadab, Eshba`al/Eshbaal, Merav/Merab, Mikhal/Michal) of (Sha'ul/Saul & Ahinoam) of Kish of (Abiel and/or Ner)...of tribe of Benjamin (1 Samuel 14; 2 Samuel 2; 1 Chronicles 8; 9)

Sons** of (Ulam, Jehush, Eliphelet) of Eshek of Eleasah of (continued in lineage above). Eshek is Ishek is Isaac. Isaac is a form of Ishmael.
** The sons of Ulam/Ulam were strong, brave men, archers; they had many children and grandchildren, a hundred and fifty. All these were descendants of Binyamin/Benjamin. Ulam is a form of Elam, Aram, Iran and Arab.

All forms of Rephaim are summarized in Rafiki, but one of his main roles in the Lion King movie is as high priest teacher. The remake rebirth of the Lion King is a clue sign to notate this period of time right now as being just before Shu-Kepheus, the Lion King, takes the throne to rule the planet of the apes (humans, other primates and all creations of this jungle). Palti’el/Paltiel of Azan /Azzan of Issachar (Numbers 34:26)

Heletz the Palti/Helez the Paltite...of see all instances of Palti/Phalti above (2 Samuel 23:26). Heletz is one of the mighty men warrior-heroes who fought with (for) King David.

Daughter of Rafa (Beit-Rafa/Bethrapha) of (Eshton & Rekhah/Rechah). Eshton of M'chir/Mehir (Machir) of Caleb...of Judah (1 Chronicles 4)

References:
Churchward, Albert, "The Origin & Evolution Of Religion," George Allen & Unwin Ltd., (London:1924)

Yishma‘el Ishmael & Yitz’chak Issac, Two Times ThreeUnity Consciousness #1647

.

(Part 9rs of 11)

We have been taking small steps to rebuild knowledge that leads out of mental breakdown behind logic lock down. Time to more consistently take larger steps and combine understandings.

For at least the past two hundred years, Kepheus and Aquaria have been vigorously awakening us and ancestors in us because they are being reinvigorated as all three, as their space and time comes of age. During the past few hundred years, deep studies have taken place that have revealed the true nature of programmed logic we so desperately cling to. Plenty enough has been uncovered to show that a surface reading of bibles and other schoolbooks will leave us overdozed. Clearly there are too many major conflicts in bibles and other schoolbooks with human history and other natural world history.
We must now more firmly reset our basic context so it starts from the understanding that the fundamental stories and messages in bibles are about superhuman people and places. Humans have infused human history into those stories to make their humanness seem other than what it is and to make human events seem other than what they were and to make the natural world do things that it didn't do. Until we revisit our schoolbooks and bibles with this context, most of the stories and lessons learned will continue to keep us tied to deformed thinking and behavior.

In a shortened basic sense, Ishmael is a combination of Ish, ma and el. Each of these three have many forms which have already been discussed. Ish is a form of Kish, Ish, Esh, Hes and Est as in Esther and Ishtar.
Ishmael came from Babylon, Chaldean, Persian, Assyria, Aram because that's where Abraham & Hagar were before coming out into Canaan land (Adonai's Promised Land is Bela's Beulah Land is Amen's Aarru Garden).

In UC#506, “Dementia In Heaven: Forgetting Ishmael Is Abraham's Son,” we pointed out the fact that God sometimes considered Isaac as Abraham's only son. Now we understand why. Ishmael and Isaac are one soul of life that manifests as twins. This is why Isaac doesn't appear until Ishmael reaches puberty of 13 years old and is circumcised. Ishmael and Isaac are another form of Sut-Horus. This twinship is actually a trinity, just as it is in heaven because there must be a transition stage when moving from one half of the twin to the other half of the twin. Because processes are taking place, you can't just have darkness, and then, Blam Alam! light appears. No, there must be the moving away from darkness and into light where the twin lights exist equally as twilight. Thus the twins of darkness and lightness are actually the trinity of darkness-twilight-lightness-twilight.

This is the two times three of the teriu (the ever-coming circle of the IU). The Mystery stems from misunderstanding the mes-terui (how in the world of mes, the waters, does one become two become one become three become one)

Ishmael, First Father Of Twelve Tribes Of Israel

After Abraham, Ishmael and his twelve tribes are an earlier phase of Jacob and his twelve tribes. None of these three are the beginning or end of when twelve tribes began.
The chief of a tribe must descend from the motherhood first. Hagar, the Egyptian is the mother. She is called a slave-girl and concubine and is disgraced by being put out of the house. This is what happened to the motherhood and the goddesses when the fatherhood came along and became pubescent. See Typhon.
Hagar & Ishmael are an earlier phase. Keturah, Midian, Rebecca, Isaac, Esau, Jacob and the mother's of Jacob's children are later phases. Consider this. The JC bible story, though flawed, still tells us that the twelve tribes of Jacob Israel came through four mothers. Two of the mother's had the same father and the other two also likely had the same father based the similarity of their names and common situation with the same family. Thus the story tells us what the superhuman tells us. The twelve tribes are not limited to one family. If we expand and connect the lineages, we will find that even the twelve tribes of Jacob Israel connect back to Africa, thus extend to all people all over the world. Since there is only one human family tree, we will also find that the twelve tribes of Ishmael and the tribes of Esau and from Mesopotamia all merge. The problem arises when we think Jacob Israel is the origin and that those twelve tribes were Semite as in pretty much white and as in original and only Jews. That is 11/12th's and 6/7th's incorrect. It is only correct when you take the most recent ages as the beginning of human history and religious bibles as containing the whole human history and as being impossible to be wrong, and intentionally so.

There is only one set of twelve tribes. What we see on Earth among humans is the twelve tribes divided in two sets of twelve tribes and then further divided into different groups and on and on. None of these groups by themselves add up to the total, the whole. God is a God of the Whole that manifests in Parts. The puzzle cannot be put together to function properly if any part is disconnected in its thinking and behavior.

The Promise Actually Came Through The Mother First

The first mother is Earth. She is represented by the Mount. This is why Ishmael grew up near Mount Shennu, because it represents the Mother Goddess and it represents Hagar, the mother mountain who brings water up out of her well and pours it out for her child. This child then, as Ishmael, grows and also produces abundance as twelve tribes. Fundamentally and first these twelve tribes were the produce and fruits of earth. Twelve species or categories of plants and animals and whatever was needed to sustain life. Everything on earth fits into twelve tribes because heaven is divided into twelve tribes that we call zodiac signs. (NG1 372)

So despite the order of the promise as told in the JC bible, Abram was the second person, after Hagar, to be told that Ishmael will be a great nation with twelve princes. (Genesis 17, 21). Although the verse says the new covenant is with Isaac, Ishmael is circumcised. This proves the covenant is first with Ishmael also, and by today's limited context, this also makes Ishmael a Jew. It also makes all of Abraham's newly circumcised slaves, Jews also. This then leaves no one out from being part of and covered under the new covenant. This new covenant does not start in the new testament of the JC bible, but starting in the old testament. From the moment any new covenant is made with any humans who are supposed to be the mother and father of all nations and all humans, that covenant is made with all people, not just for those two people, no matter how narrowly defined in recent ages. Whatever your religion says about any agreement your God has with you, your people or with any people, that agreement applies to all people. It is just being expressed through your version of the one and only covenant. That covenant is the same as what was established with the first humans, no matter how developed or less developed we think they were. That covenant is, was and will always be established with all plants, primates, all animals, celestial bodies and anything that exists. There is only one covenant. That covenant has many forms and many divisions. Precision is lost, vision is lost without the overall context. Anyone who believes in the power of physical circumcision of genitals, that power is also lost and becomes null, void, forever painful and counterproductive to life here, now and after, if that circumcision creates the narrowness of understandings. Division is not for the purpose of permanent separation, but rather for the purpose of being necessary to accomplish continuous recombination. Construct-deconstruct-construct. Compose, decompose, compose. Cycle, recycle, cycle. Think, rethink, think. Eat, excrete, eat. Each one of these involves numerous processes of division, separation, recombination. Consider the last example: What we eat today was excreted yesterday relatively speaking. And what we excrete today will be eaten tomorrow. This is true spiritually, emotionally, mentally, physically, naturally, divinely, universally.

So to repeat, even though professors of the JC bible try to claim exclusivity as to who is a Jew and who is part of the twelve tribes of Jacob Israel, and claim that Ishmaelites are the first and only Arabs, yet and still the JC bible itself provides multiple ways to know better. That is, when we use the proper context so we can better connect all logic we encounter anywhere to the whole.

Another way to look at the JC bible is that even in a suboptimal sense, the story of Abraham makes sense. Supposedly white Abraham and his black sex slave gave birth to Ishmael, but white Abraham and his white wife Sarah gave birth to white Isaac who was more blessed and chosen and Ishmael was put out of the house into the desert with only water and bread and almost died. Isaac goes on to continue the fatherhood of Abraham. Isaac also chooses his better looking whiter son Jacob, over his hairy red twin son Esau. The Edomites become despised as an earlier example of deeply ingrained white on white crime. All this is how the perception was changed from God and humans as black in origin to white in origin and also from mother in origin to father in origin. The next logical steps must be genderism and racism. First it was black on black then black on white then white on white then white on black. First it was female on female then female on male, then male on female then male on male. And this is why, at the short end of this dual process are black males. Correct your logic about the origins of things, and correct a lot of things, including cancers of all types. Because certainly, genderism and racism are cancers that have spawned many more cancers that we give different names and don't view as the effects of genderism or racism, and ultimately as the result of not understanding the origins of things, neither above or below or within or without. Things fall apart when twins come apart at the seems like truth.

Think about it people! What kind of person is Abraham who puts all his sex slaves and children out, because old ass Sarah had a self-esteem problem? If Abraham is a real person and that is the real story, then Abraham and his God should be rejected on that basis alone.

Think about it. Even if in recent ages, the Israelites continued to mix until they became half back and half white, that does not change the original fact that Abraham was totally a black man. Here's a clue to prove God has a sense of humor too. Just look at Abraham's name, A Bru Ham or A Broham. Many messages have proven who Abraham and Sarah are.

Ishmael Is Ever-coming Out Of Egypt

Another way to understand Ishma-el as the father of the twelve tribes of Isra-el, is through the ever-coming one, EL. “Out of Egypt I have called my son,” is talking about the ever-coming one who can appear in any form and in any number. (Matthew 2:15). Humans as a group were called out of Egypt. Also both Hagar and Abraham are representations of Egypt. Out of those two Egypts, a son is called who will be called Immanuel (Ishmanuel, Ishmael). Also, all the continents and islands are a form of the child that was called out of the Africa continent. The people of the world and in Canaan have been continuously reborn out of Africa. Semper aliquid novi Africam adferre
In the JC version of the story, humans are again being reborn out of Mesopotamia which is a condensed form of the Nile Valley. The phrase might be better understood when read as, “out of Africa I have called my child.”
The JC bible is telling another version of the human story, another version of Africa, Ethiopia, Egypt.
And this is why the JC bible relies heavily upon the history and mythology of The Nile Valley and Mesopotamian Valley and of Canaan, as the basis for everything in the JC bible. There is nothing new. What is perceived as new is something old differently constructed to match the current group of star ages (stages, ages).

Reminder How Creation Started

The trinity in heaven, along with their form as the seven elementals, fused their multiple personalities mirror images to make one human who would be the same as them, no matter how you look at it. This is true despite our level of understanding, the truth remains the same, even though combinations and perspectives change.

By virtue of the nature of human creation, that first human had to be the singular composite form of multiple plural forms. Then as that human grew, developed and reproduced, more and more of those multiple forms began to manifest in human form that had already manifested in superhuman form and in all other creations on Earth, then inside our bodies to bring us into being in this form we call human.

In fact, the merging of sperm and egg, and then their continuous ever-coming developmental processes, is the same as how the ever-coming one has created everything.

One of the basic ever-coming forms is one being who is a twin singular being, then becomes two separate beings, while still remaining one being.
This precisely describes male and female in each human. The first human was born one person who was a twin, then that person had to give birth (evolve) and differentiate itself into female and male. This does not disallow evolution from earlier primates. It supports the superhuman processes of evolution from primates called apes, monkeys and chimpanzees. All of these clues stick to us like gorilla glue.
Humans did not catch a magic carpet ride, or leapfrog from heaven or rise up out of dust or from a rib bone or get created in Africa, then start over and get created in Asia, then in Korea, then in China, then somewhere else. It's dazing how many countries, in their government website official history, baselessly claim (by virtue of some kind of Balaam Elam Abra Kadabracy) to have come into being as a separate group that was created without being born out of an existing human.

By using multiple ways of knowing, I.e., all of our sensing abilities that makes us more aware of the extended self, we humans can break free of the one way of knowing mentality, especially the religious bible way. A major reason genderism and racism exist is because religious bibles and other schoolbooks support that logic. Your education and your religion are responsible. We use those books and daily media as our primary way of knowing that trumps and disallows, refuses, resists, rejects and denies all other information, even information provided by God using evidence within us and using non-humans.

Out of Egypt have I called both mother and son, Hagar and Ishmael as Aquaria and Kepheus. This time both are pubescent and ready to do battle to retake and reunite the two thrones of the two lands, in order to create a more perfect union.

Goliath, Thrice Killed, One Fell Swoop After AnotherUnity Consciousness #1646

.

(Part 9rt of 11)

First Time Killed By David

This was during the days of King Saul of Israel & Judah.
(1 Samuel 17)

A champion from the camp of the Philistines, named Golyat/Goliath, from Gat, was nine feet nine inches tall.

KJV: And David put his hand in his bag, and took thence a stone, and slang it, and smote the Philistine in his forehead, that the stone sunk into his forehead; and he fell upon his face to the earth. So David prevailed over the Philistine with a sling and with a stone, and smote the Philistine, and slew him...

CJB: David put his hand in his bag, took out a stone, and hurled it with his sling. It struck the P’lishti in his forehead and buried itself in his forehead, so that he fell face down on the ground. Thus David defeated the P’lishti with a sling and a stone, striking the P’lishti and killing him.

Second Time Killed By David

KJV: David ran, and stood upon the Philistine, and took his sword, and drew it out of the sheath thereof, and slew him, and cut off his head therewith.

CJB: Then David ran and stood over the P’lishti, took his sword, drew it out of its sheath, and finished killing him, cutting off his head with it.

In 1 Samuel 21:10 and 1 Samuel 22:10, Goliath was confirmed dead.

Third Time Killed, This Time By Elhanan

This was during the days of King David of Israel & Judah.
(2 Samuel 21:19)

KJV: And there was again a battle in Gob with the Philistines, where Elhanan the son of Jaareoregim, a Bethlehemite, slew the brother of Goliath the Gittite, the staff of whose spear was like a weaver's beam.

CJB Paraphrased for readability: There was more war with the Philistines. Elhanan, son of a Beit-Lachmi, killed Golyat/Goliath the Gitti, who had a spear with a shaft like a weaver’s beam.

We notice how the KJV adds “the brother of” to significantly change the meaning of the verse.

The third time Goliath is killed is repeated in (1 Chronicles 20:5)

CJB: There was more war with the Philistines. Elhanan killed Lachmi the brother of Golyat/Goliath the Gitti, who had a spear with a shaft like a weaver’s beam.

In the verse above, the CJB gets into the act of switcheroo by claiming that the second part of Beit-Lachmi is the name of the giant. Let's check.
In the CJB, we notice the use of “Beit-Lachmi,” in 1 Samuel 16:1 and 16:18 and 1 Samuel 17:18. Each time the KJV translates this, it is as “Bethlehemite.” Notice who Beit-Lachmi is referring to in those three verses. It is referring to Yishai/Jesse, the father of David. In other words, Lachmi/Lahmi is not the name of Goliath's brother. Even if it is, then what we should see in the KJV is Lachmi translated as Lehemite. Let's check.

KJV: And there was war again with the Philistines; and Elhanan the son of Jair slew Lahmi the brother of Goliath the Gittite, whose spear staff was like a weaver's beam.

What else should we expect from the KJV which takes the CJB to an even greater suboptimal level of okie-doke misrepresentation.

Bottom Line: There was never a human giant named Goliath that a human David killed or that any human in human David's army killed. David and Goliath are superhumans, spirit-souls, elementals and combinations of elements. Goliath, and giants by many names had been killed many times by many different types of Davids in the superhuman realm. This has continued to take place. The superhuman metaphor then manifests in the human world by using something relatively small to defeat something relatively large and seemingly undefeatable.
Right now, for instance, a human giant is the American-led United Nations and the citizens who support those countries. Simply put, those cultures are going to be brought down to their knees, and when the people finally recognize it, it will seem like it happened in one fell swoop.

Seriously. If this a story about human history, then if the Philistines had that many giants giving birth to giants, then all they had to do was bum-rush their enemies, especially bold and beautiful David. Instead , we are told one giant at a time came up against the Israelites and were killed one by one. How lingeringly convenient is belief and faith if that's all it takes for us to continue to accept these types of stories. Belief and faith prevents us from acknowledging our logically concluded mistakes. This prevents us from changing as the logical landscape is being reshaped by giants in the waters, now coming out of us to meet us face to face where there is no place to run or escape, only surrender or death, then death.

Lachmi Further Revealed

Lakhsmi/Laksmi is the Hindu goddess wife of Vishnu.

Maat From The Bottom To The TopUnity Consciousness #1645

.

(Part 9rs of 11)

Maat From The Bottom To The Top

by Sadalsuud & Alderamin through Usekhu

Less knowledge of the whole, more believable the partial.
All the time.

Less is more.
Knowledge is belief.
Whole is partial.
Sometimes.

Mordecai The Jew, Merodach The IUUnity Consciousness #1644

.

(Part 9rr of 11)

As mentioned elsewhere, Mordecai is the first specific person called a Jew. This doesn't take place until the Book of Esther, Chapter 2. In this chapter the Israelites are in captivity in the Persian capital of Shushan just east of the Tigris River and just north of the Persian Gulf. Persia ruled, like many empires, from Egypt and Ethiopia to Asshur (Assyria, Persia).

Is Mordecai A Form Of Merodach

We compare:
Mordekai / Mordecai (Esther 2:5)
M’rodakh / Merodach (Jeremiah 50:2)

It does not take much to move between M'rodakh and Mordekai. We still need further investigation.

Horus (Jesus) has many forms. One of those is Herakles in Greece, Krishna in India and Merodach in Assyria. (AE1 275)
Is Mordecai a form of Horus Merodach who can also be called Jesus Merodach?

In Assyria (Mesopotamia included), Merodach is called a Goddess by the name of Ri (Li). Ri (Li) is called “the Mother who bore me,” and is considered to be both mother and father in one. This fits the twin nature of Horus as being both darkness and lightness, female and male, child and parent, ever-living and ever-coming. (NG1 513)

Eveel-M’rodakh/Evilmerodach becomes King of Babylon. In his first year, he released Jehoiachin king of Judah, from prison, and gave him better food and living conditions if Jehoiachin was his eldest son. Jehoiachin had been captive for 37 years. (Jeremiah 52:31), (2 Kings 25:27).
The reason for Evilmerodach's compassion on Jehoiachin has a connection to Evilmerodach being a form of Horus as Abel, the child who died and has been reborn before, but this time as King of Babylon.

Jehoiachin's Lineage

Jehoiachin is the son of (Jehoiakim & Nehusta) (2 Kings 24:6)

Paternal lineage: Jehoiachin (Jeconiah/Coniah) of Eliakim/Jehoiakim of Josiah (Josias) of Amon of Manasseh (& Meshullemeth/ Meshillemoth of Haruz of Jotbah) of Hezekiah of Ahaz of Jotham of Azariah of Amaziah of Joash of Ahaziah of Joram of Jehoshaphat of Asa of Abia/Abijam of (Rehoboam & Maachah) of Solomon (& Naamah an Ammonitess of Lot's lineage) of David (& Bathsheba/Bathshua of Ammiel) of Jesse (Nachash, Nahash, King of Ammon) of Obed of Boaz (& Ruth) of Salmon/Salma (& Rachab) of Nahshon/Naasson of Amminadab of Ram of Hezron of Pharez of Judah (& Tamar), (2 Samuel 17:25), (1 Chronicles 2)

Maternal lineage: Nehusta of Elnathan of Achbor of Michaiah/Mikhayah of Gemariah of Shaphan ….of Levi (2 Kings 22:12; 24:8), (Jeremiah 26:22; 36:11)
Nehusta's uncle is Baalhanan was a King of Edom. (Genesis 36:38)

Both Nahash and Nehusta are forms of the serpent which represents the rebirth regeneration of life.
Nehusta is also a form of Nehusi, Nehsi, or Nahsi, or unmixed black from Nubia. Abel who experienced evil by being murdered, was reborn as Evilmerodach and repaid evil with kindness towards Jehoiachin, In other words, Evil manifests under it's other definition as a form of good. (Rogers: Sex and Race, 52)
Nehusta, Jehoiachin's mother, strengthened Jehoiachin's birthright even stronger than his father did. This then would start a new stronger more complete Melchizedek-type line of rulership through Jehoiachin, rather than through Rehoboam, Solomon and David a line which likely had been diluted due to generations and not marrying back into the ruling bloodline.
And this is why Jehoiakim, Jehoiachin and Nehusta were cutoff from having more children because their bloodline was likely stronger than Babylonian and Persian. This is also likely why, due to Zeruiah as likely oldest sibling, had her rulership lineage in the case of Jeroboam, taken and delayed and then both Jeroboam's who became King of Israel were considered the epitome of terrible rulership. This cuts off the serpents two heads of regeneration and makes room for the period of very brief immediate family transfer rulership and the constant murderous fight for rulership, to begin anew, that started in Egypt and exists today in most nations. Most rulers came to power through murder, not by birthright. This is to be expected during the suboptimal part of history.

What is also becoming clearer is that Abraham was likely the younger brother of both Nahor and Haran. Both of them had cities in Aram Mesopotamia Babylon Chaldea. This is why Abraham's descendants went back to marry descendants of Haran and Nahor. Abraham likely wanted his birthright now, in advance of his brother's passing it on through death. Abraham left home with very little. He also had to make himself unbeholden to governance from the people and Gods he came from. As discussed elsewhere, Abraham is a form of the Abra and Afra.

In the midst of seemingly non-stop fighting with each other, another curious mention of Babylonian kindness is when King (M’rodakh-Bal’adan, B’rodakh-Bal’adan) / (Merodachbaladan, Berodachbaladan) the son of Baladan, sent letters and a present to King Hezekiah of Judah when he heard Hezekiah had been sick. (Isaiah 39:1; 2 Kings 20:12)
From the time of Hezekiah and this group of Babylonian Kings, there were then three more Kings of Judah (Manasseh, Amon, Josiah) before the time of Eliakim Jehoiakim of Judah and Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon.
In 2 Kings 25 and Jeremiah 52, Nebuchadnezzar again dies a mysterious non-mentioned death or disappearance and Evilmerodach becomes King of Babylon. Evilmerodach is likely the child of Baladan. Nebuchadnezzar must have lost power briefly back to the tribe of Baladan.

To Answer The Question

Yes Mordecai is Merodach. Mordecai is the foster parent of Esther, even though Esther is his first cousin. He must have been much older. Likewise Eviilmerodach becomes the foster parent of Jehoiachin. Both Esther's and Jehoichin's parents were no longer alive. Merodach rose to second in power in the kingdom.

Migdol | Where Is It Located?Unity Consciousness #1643

.

(Part 9rq of 11)

Migdol is Hebrew for tower. A migdol is a Syrian-styled tower per Bunson. (Smith: Dictionary 400), (Bunson: Encyclopedia 250-1)
Based on JC bible verses, Migdol is in Egypt; however, like many place names today, there was more than one location named Migdol.

1. Migdol was a site east of the Red Sea in Sinai (Egypt) where the Egyptians maintained a fortified tower with massive walls. This could be the same location as Kadesh which is described as a stronghold.

2. Migdol is a Syrian style fortress built at Medinet (Habu, Abu, Abou) in Upper Egypt by Ramesses III, Hyksos Shepherd King of Egypt. (Bunson: Encyclopedia 262). And we wonder why movies about Egypt show little to no black people. It's because those movies are portraying periods of time under rule by eventual lighter skinned tribes. Those portrayals represent recent history relatively speaking, and not the enormous amount of Egyptian rulership by black skinned people when no other color group existed. (Brugsch-Bey: History 398), (Taylor: Names 290)

3. Migdol, northwest of the Red Sea in Lower Egypt. There are heaps of debris at Tell-es-Samut on the eastern side of Lake Menzaleh. A little further to the northeast is Anbu (Shur, Gerrhon, Gerrha) Anbu is the first terminal point of the great military road, which led from the Delta by Khetam-Etham and Migdol to the desert of Shur. This understanding helps us go back and review the places the Israelites wandered in the desert and we will realize they wandered a long time on the west side of the Red Sea before crossing into Sinai. This goes against the Exodus story, especially the movie version. It took weeks for the Israelites to get out of Egypt and they took the road. (Brugsch-Bey: History 288-90, 549)

Mag'dolum (Migdol of the Old Testament) was about 12 miles S. of Pelusium in Lower Egypt along the coastal road that led between Aegypt and Phoenicia. (Smith: Dictionary 284), (Lewis: Astronomy 317)

4. Migol (Magdolum) in the Books of Kings and Chronicles is near the lake of Galilee. (Lewis: Astronomy 317)

5. Ar-Megiddo, a fortress on the northern slopes of Mount Carmel, in modern Israel. (Bunson: Encyclopedia 252)

6. Spelling variations of Migdol: Akar-Magedon, Armageddon, Har-Magedon, Har Megiddo, Kar-Magedon, Karma-geddon, Khar-Magedon, Makthel, Maktol, Magdol, Magdolon. Mag'dolum, Magedon, Megiddo, Samud, Samut, (Brugsch-Bey: History 284, 288-90, 443, 549), (UC#1036 Armageddon)

References:
small> Brugsch-Bey, Henry, A History Of Egypt Under The Pharaohs Derived Entirely From The Monuments, Vol I, Second Edition, (London: 1881), Translated & Edited From German by Smith, Phillip

Bunson, Margaret R. "Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt, Revised Edition" (New York: 2002) Facts on File, Inc.

small>Lewis, Sir George Cornewall, An Historical Survey of the Astronomy Of The Ancients, (London: 1862)

Smith, William, Editor, "A Dictionary Of Greek & Roman Geography," John Murray (London:1873), Volume II, download pdf.

Taylor, Isaac, "Names and Their Histories: A Handbook of Historical Geography and Topographical Nomenclature," Rivingtons, (London:1898), Second Edition Revised, p. , download pdf.

Keep Looking Everywhere To Find Who Persians AreUnity Consciousness #1642

.

(Part 9rp of 11)

This question has already been answered in various ways, yet we keep looking to find who the Persians are?

During the time of Mordecai, Achashverosh/Ahasuerus was king of Persia. This is definitely after the time of Daniel and Ezra. Also possibly Nehemiah and Jeremiah.
Achash + verosh is close to Nachash/Nahash . Nachash has been described above and in a separate message.
Verosh is close to Parosh. Parosh is one of the tribes that was in captivity in Babylon. Parosh is a chief and his tribe is listed first among those numbered. (Ezra 2, Nehemiah 10).
Parosh is also one of those who were sealed (made a new covenant with God) after being held captive by Nebuchadnezzar, King of Babylon. Then they went straight into Persian captivity. In order for the story to be more chronological, the book of Daniel should be between 2 Kings and Jeremiah. (Nehemiah 1:1, 7:6; 9-10; Esther 1:1)

There is an Achashtare of (Ashur and Na'arah) of (Hezron & Abiah) of Pharez of (Judah & Tamar) of (Jacob Israel & Leah) (1 Chronicles 2; 4)

So temporarily stated, the Persians are connected to Nachash to Ammon to Egypt Ethiopia. This is enough to know who they were and are but we can show this several ways. But first we have to take a side road to layout the climate of the times. This is not the beginning of the story. An earlier account starts in Genesis 14 and Judges 1. Before Achashverosh became King of Persia, there was a continuous fight for power among at least seven groups: (1) Egypt Ethiopia; (2) Rome; (3) Greece; (4) Israelite Canaanites (Hyksos); (5) Syrian Edomites; (6) Syrian Babylonian Chaldeans; (7) Assyrian Persians. Each of these groups succeeded for a while, but there is also always infighting within each group. Among the Israelites, this infighting started with Israel's first king, King Saul. Before Saul, the rulership of Israel and Canaan was established in the land known as Edom, but not established through the tribe of Esau Edom of Isaac & Rebecca. No, neither Edom, the land, nor Edom, the name, belongs to the lineage of Abraham. The name Edom, like many others was stolen and attached to Abraham's lineage, just as was the name Abraham and the name Israel. These names do not belong to one lineage of humans, but rather to all humans, as does the name “Jew.” An additional way of knowing this is by understanding that Edom is a form of Adam. Adam is a form of the first human who was female and male. Adam represents all humans, not just males. The name Adam was applied to males only, but incorrectly; however, the limited and non-harmonious use of genetic potential is necessary in order to create suboptimal logic.

What also helps is understanding the JC Bible contains stories told in chronological disarray. What you read first in any chapter is not always what happened first.
This leads to the understanding that neither the world nor the land of Canaan was sitting around waiting on the lineage of Abraham before there was a King of Edom. No! Edom already had rulership and which did not include Esau Edom of the JC Bible.
When Abraham and Lot left Mesopotamia Babylonia Chaldea Aram, there was already a king or kings over the land of Canaan. We now fast forward a little to the time when the Moses led Hyksos Israelites were kicked out of Egypt and called it “the exodus.” At that time it appears Balaam of Beor was King of a significant portion of the “unpromised land” and he ruled from Mesopotamia (Deuteronomy 23). Balaam did not control all the land. Other kings were (1) over Edom, King Bela of Beor; (2) over Moab, King Balak of Zippor (Numbers 22); (3) over Midian, Amorite King Sihon. Moses killed King Sihon and the Amorites, who came out to stop the Israelites from trampling through his land like non-house-trained locusts. This was the first battle and victory for the Israelites, which must have been euphoric because the Israelites went on a killing spree. (Numbers 21, Deuteronomy 1). As a first encore, they killed King Og of Bashan, King Balaam of Persia, the King of Moab and the princes of Midian (Moses' in-laws) (Numbers 31:8, Joshua 13:21).

As mentioned in the previous message, King Saul of Israel fought King Saul of Edom. David fought Hadadezer of Persia. David killed all the males in Edom to kill all heirs. Hadad escaped, went to Egypt for awhile, then, after David died, Hadad gained rulership in Damascus as King of Aram Syria. (1 Kings 11). David fought non-Iraelites and Israelites in order to maintain power. So did Solomon because neither were rightful heirs. Saul, David and Solomon were able to maintain control over all of Israel, but after that, there was always a King of Israel and a King of Judah or Israel or Judah or both were under the control of another group. Those particular Jews were divided and could not get along. Also, even within those two groups, there was infighting for power.

Pause For A Diatribe

So stop repeating the notorious lie that black people can't get along, can't work together, can't be unified. In the past 13,000 years, no group of people have been unified for very long. And when they were, it was a very limited form of unity and only to gain power from another group, then they immediately returned to infighting, not petty fighting, but to the extreme of backstabbing and murder and forming divisions among themselves, including religious divisions. This is true of white people, semites, asians, chinese, japanese, mexicans, and so on. All you have to do to see this is look through all your eyes. Listen to Kwame Toure, Malcom X, Marcus Garvey, Booker T. Washington, W.E.B. DuBois, John Henrik Clarke, Marimba Ani, Frances Cress-Welsing, Joy DeGruy and others who understand through So Dayi Eyes. For the Ages of Aquaria and Kepheus, these are the lineages of the mighty men and women, the warrior-heroes, the prophets, the priests, the queens and kings by any name.

Who Are The Persians – Looking Through Marriage

All the people talked about since the beginning of this message are Persians. We now look through the curved lens of marriage.

Ezra 10 is another super contradictory chapter. It says Adonai didn't like the Israelites marrying strange women so those they married in Babylon they had to send away along with the children. The tribe of Parosh was one of the tribes.
1. Clearly, the Israelite women must have also taken strange husbands.
2. As restated in the previous message, most of Israel's most well-known and respected people, married “strange” spouses.
3. Ezra speaks of strange wives, yet in the next book, Esther, she herself becomes Queen of Persia, and she is still respected to this day.
4. All of the Israelites were the children of strange wives and husbands. The Israelites came from Babylon, Chaldea, Canaan, Egypt, etc.

5. Haran and Nahor were Persians, thus this leads across to Abraham and back to Moses. All those people listed as descendants of Shem, Ham and Japheth are Persians.

It is not your geographic location where you were born or where you lived or where you live now or where you claim citizenship, that makes you who you are. Geography is a suboptimal identifier when its significance is placed before genetics.
All humans are Persians and Jews by virtue of our creation. Consider this, take an apple, grow it in Africa, then take the seeds and grow them anywhere else, call one a plum, one a cherry and one a peach, and still that apple is an apple by virtue of its genetics, even though its fullness and variability are misidentified.
Our naming an apple, an apple, by the way it looks, does not limit the genetics that formed that form, from forming another form.

It's on us to understand what's in us.

Marriage and migration and differentiation and appellations do not change who you truly are.

Who Are The Persians – Looking Through Daniel

There is a slight spelling difference between Daniel and the son of Nebuchadnezzar.
Belt’shatzar/Belteshazzar is Daniel.
Belshatzar/Belshazzar is the son of Nebuchadnezzar.

This difference is smoke and mirrors to disguise the fact that Daniel and the son of the king of Babylon and the King of Babylon, are all forms of each other. This is exposed in at least the following verses.
1. (Daniel 4) Daniel and Nebuchadnezzar become the same person towards the end of the chapter, because it is Nebuchadnezzar speaking in first person and Daniel writing, calling himself Nebuchadnezzar.

2. (Daniel 5) Despite Nebuchadnezzar being restored to the throne at the end of Chapter 4, somehow Nebuchadnezzar's son, Belshazzar, becomes King of Babylon at the beginning of Chapter 5. Belshatzar, the son, then passes the kingship on to Belteshazzar (Daniel). Then Belshazzar the son is killed. By the way, even though he is King of Babylon, he is called King of Chaldea. Ezra 5:12 calls Nebuchadnezzar, a Chaldean. This, added with other verses, again confirms that Chaldeans and Babylonians are the same. Since Abraham was from Ur of Chaldea, then Abraham is a Babylonian. And since Nimrod and Asshur came out of the same land, then they are all the same, including Persians.
The story in Daniel 5 evidently starts in the third year of King Belshazzar, because even though he dies in Chapter 5, he is still alive in Chapter 8. The story, like most of the JC bible, is told in haphazard order, like a jigsaw puzzle where the pieces seem to match and you force them to fit. As you comprehend more of the puzzle, the errors become more obvious.

3. (Daniel 6 and 9) Rulership of Babylon and other lands passed on to Daryavesh/Darius, a Mede Persian, son of Achashverosh. The kingdom ranged from Egypt to Mede. It doesn't make sense for the son of Achashverosh to become king before Achashverosh himself. Likely the assassination of Belshazzar, was a takeover by the tribe of Medes. (Nehemiah 12:22' Daniel 6:1). Furthermore, Ezra 4:5 says Koresh Cyrus was King before Daryavesh Darius.
A Mede is from Media east of the Tigris. Mede and Media are not the same location as Medan or Midian.
The only way this really makes sense if for the events of Daniel to take place first under Nebuchadnezzar. Then Daryavesh Darius takes over, then Koresh Cyrus. Then the Book of Esther takes place under King Achashverosh, the father of Darius and Koresh. This makes sense if Daryavesh Darius is the prepubescent soul, Koresh Cyrus is the pubescent, and then Achashverosh is the father. Achasverosh is succeeded by Artach’shashta / Artaxerxes (Ezra 4)

4. Belshazzar, King of Babylon and King of Babylon, disappear after Daniel 8 and the kingdom passes to Koresh/Cyrus, a Persian in Chapter 10 who already had three (3) years under his belt. (pun intended). Koresh is Horus who was resurrected after three days, three years, thirty years, three hundred years, three thousand years.

5. (Ezra 1) This chapter confirms Koresh is Horus because Koresh, King of Persia is told by God, to go build a temple in Jerusalem, evidently for the Israelites. This is the same Koresh who has continued the captivity of the Israelites and threw Daniel in the lion's den. This is the same Adonai Lord God of the Jews who made Abraham his people, but decided to have pagans from Persia build the temple house of God. Why? Because the God of Abraham is a johnny-come-lately God, who could only rise by assuming the nature, power and possessions of what other Gods already had. Finally, the God of Abraham, after having a temple built by Solomon, decided to have the next one built by Persians? Why because these Persian temples (to Baal) were more original and included more symbolic understandings and because the Persians were God's people before Abraham was God's people. Thus the Persians were Jews before Abraham and crew. The Persians were Edomites and Israelites before there was an Esau or Jacob born of Isaac & Rebecca. Why? Because Abraham is simply a later version of Persian.
Just as the Egyptians were a later version of Ethiopian. And this is also why the Egyptians kept going back to Ethiopia and partly why the Ethiopians kept taking over Egypt to try to set the house of God back in order.

To add to this story, while the Israelites were building the house of God, their enemies came and asked if they could help because they had also been worshiping the same God. How crazy is that? Then Zerubbabel and the elders of Israel said, no you can't help because we have NOTHING in common. How crazy is that? Especially from someone with the name Zerubbabel (An Israelite named after confusion and named after Babylon). This story of temple building is as non-credible as the Tower of Babel as an explanation for why humans speak different languages. (Ezra 4)

We must always ask basic questions as a means of double-checking. Why would enemies of Israel want to help them build a temple? I know what the bible says, but why would they? Just because they worship the same God? No, that has not been enough to not make them enemies anymore. It only makes sense if the main difference was not them thinking they had a different heritage or worshiped a different God, but rather the main difference was human frailty of seeking power and understanding without the responsibility of the rights that come with it or the effort and resources sacrificed to achieve it.
Another basic question is why would supposedly decent folks such as the Israelites say they had nothing in common with people who said the worshiped the same God, who is the same God who wants everyone to worship him? Clearly worshiping the same God as those who persecute you with racism, is not enough. The JC bible story makes more sense if Israelites wanted to claim credit for building a temple and city such as Jerusalem on their own, when instead, they did not because it was a joint effort of multiple tribes who were not Israelites, and were likely tribes ranging from at least the area between the Nile Valley and Tigris-Euphrates Valley.

We can simply believe words on paper in one book, or we can consult multiple books or we can consult several other ways of knowing, or we can do all three? Which way is likely to be more reliable?

How many times has that strong believable feeling of love turned out to not match reality?

Who Are The Persians – Looking Through Haman

Haman was a Persian leader under King Achashverosh, when the Israelites were slaves again in Persia in Shushan.
Haman was made leader over all the officers of King Achashverosh/Ahasuerus. (Esther 3)

Haman of Hamdata of Agagi....of Amalek of (Eliphaz & Timna, concubine) (1 Samuel 15:8)
Eliphaz of (Esau & Adah)
Timnah/Timna as female is of Seir the Horite (Genesis 36), (1 Chronicles 1:39)
Timnah as male is of Esau (1 Chronicles 1:51)
Esau of (Isaac & Rebecca)
Adah of Eilon the Hittite. (Genesis 36:2)
According to the JC bible, everybody came from Noah. Everybody came from Adam & Eve.
How are we not the same?

Haman was an Esau Edomite Amalekite Horite Chaldean Hittite Persian Jew from the Garden of Eden.
We continue to the next section to show another way of knowing.

Is Haman A Form of Heman?

1. King Saul spared the life of Agag, King of the Amalekites (Edomites). Then Judge Prophet Temple Guard Samuel killed Agag.

2. Then Samuel's lineage gave rebirth to Agag through : Heman of Joel of Shemuel/Samuel of (Elkanah & Hannah) of Jeroham of Eliel of Toah of Zuph[related to Zoph, Suph, Suf] of Elkanah of Mahath of Amasai of Elkanah of Joel of Azariah of Zephaniah of Tahath of Assir of Ebiasaph of Korah of Izhar of Kohath of Levi of (Jacob & Leah) (1 Chronicles 6), (2 Chronicles 29:14)

3. Heman of (Mahol & Zerah, likely a form of Zeruiah) of (Judah & Tamar) of (Jacob Israel & Leah) of (Isaac & Rebecca) of (Abraham & Sarah) (1 Chronicles 2), (1 Kings 4:31)

4. (Hori, Hemam/Homam) of Lotan of Seir the Horite (Genesis 36), (1 Chronicles 1:39)

5. Hemam/Homam are reborn as Haman, then Haman is reborn through Levi and Judah
6. Haman, the Persian Jew, is an earlier form of the Israelite Jew.

IT is less about US as humans, and more about the truth (ter-it) as superhuman.