(9azzzzzzzzzzzzzzw of 11)
In this Day and Age, most people think our use of technology is evidence of:1. civilization
2. best education, thus highest intelligence
Despite the masses of current day humans believing they are in the midst of 1 and 2 above, we have no actual factual sense of the basis of comparison we are making.
We don't look at any of the components of earlier human groupings to see what the defining parameters are that qualified them to be less civilized, less educated and less intelligent.
To make our lack of facts worse, we don't have an accurate definition of “civilization”, “education” or “intelligence”.
This is miseducation at its finest because we don't spend a single second asking questions, seeking information and listing potential answers to things such as:
1. How did these supposedly less intelligent, less civilized, even uncivilized people,
a) Manage to increase their population numbers since they had none of the stuff we have that helps us be born, fed, safe, warm and kept alive?
b) How did they feed so many people?
c) How did they house themselves?
d) How did they survive summers without air conditioning?
e) How did they make enough clothing?
f) How did they even know how to make clothing?
g) How did they pay for water, sewer, trash pickup, and other utilities?
Spend only one minute on each of the above, because if you don't have any answers to these, yet you believe either past people didn't have these things or they had them despite being less than us, then you have enough evidence of unsatisfactory factoring you have used in thought processes full of flawed logic.
I repeat. We have factories to provide us food. How did all these primitive people all over the world, live together in large groups and provide food for themselves without factories?For housing, we have factories for building supplies and multiple contractors and tradespeople to build houses. How did primitive people build houses, build enough houses, build sufficient houses and keep them from burning down when all they had was fire, and do all of this without factories?
Were primitive people homeless?
How did primitive people furnish their homes without factories?
How did primitive people have more than one outfit, without factories? By the time they made another, wouldn't their current one have worn out or been outgrown, especially since primitive people did everything the hard way while we do everything the smart way, as evidenced by our better quality of life?
What's The Point?
The point is, we think the presence of factories filled with machinery and the abundance of stuff they process and produce is evidence of our evolution.Modern day factories introduce more problems than solutions. If we don't know this by now, we will never ever ever know it.
We think our modern form of mass productions and factories is the way, even our use of solar power, wind power, geothermal power and electric cars, all of which require too many materials and wires and batteries and converters and inverters and alternators and replacement parts and...
Obviously, our method of generating and transmitting electricity is significantly flawed because this method cannot survive basic weather events. The problem is not limited to overhead wires or to electricity being generated by wood, coal, gas or nuclear.
African Achievement Unsatisfactory To People Who Have Stolen The Legacy Of Their Parents
There are many ways to know the evidences of African achievements that should at least cause us to question what is promoted today as better achievements.Even according to the Judaeo-Christian-Muslim bible, people in Asia ran to and depended on Egypt many times. African achievement is everywhere. It's where you are right now. It's even in you. There is no achievement worthy of mentioning that does not depend on, rest on and is an extension of African achievement. Pick a subject and follow it to its origin and do not settle for the plethora of books and articles that state an origin came from so and so or such and such a place, yet gives no mention of Africa. This information is false evidence appearing real because the inventors of these illusions fear the truth of African achievement. Just to state a teeny tiny bit of these achievements, Nile Valley Africans built many temples and statues and pyramids, and obviously had homes and food, and enough to help outside people during famine. Yet they had no factories.
And according to decidedly stupid people, these Africans did all they did with only rocks, ropes and chisels.
So if you believe that, then why don't we create more than enough of everything for everyone and do so without destroying the natural world, ourselves with so many direct effects of unsatisfactory logic that tries to satisfy itself factoring in the false and factoring out the true?
By The Way
Why is there unsatisfactory but not dissatisfactory?Dissatisfaction but not unsatisfaction?
Yet there is unsatisfied and dissatisfied.
