.
( 9aly of 11)
I left the following comment on a youtube video:
The problem is the commons not being based on a communal concept that is based on unity in its fundamental ecosystem sense. Instead unity is based on fragments and superficialness and then everyone asserts individual and smaller group rights that run counter to the overall communal, thus the commons.
Don't Count On Your Right To Farm | The Movement Against Farms
Many of the contradictions have been discussed on this weblog.
A few contradictions specific to this video are requiring a license to use the word organic, making it illegal to harvest rainwater, illegal to grow food in your front yard and many other things that clearly show a contradiction of logic about health, unity, rights, ownership, community, rights of creation and so many other fundamental understandings. These form the framework for individuals and collectives, but when everyone has their own set of understandings, especially at the fundamental level, then contradictions of logic exist, which creates inner conflict and outer conflict with many other aspects of creation. Under such conditions there is no solution possible within the confines of such logic. There is no win-win.
The Initiate seeking to become Adept will search forms of words such as contradict, contradicts, contradiction, contractions, contradictory, conflict, logic, critical and so on. This process is necessary to get a fuller range of understandings of any message on this blog and about anything encountered anywhere in this life. Following such a process will provide broad contextual understandings that allows the person to apply it to all things. It will also provide additional specific understandings relating to a particular topic. This process in and of itself is a way to doublecheck one's own understandings, thus be better able to detect contradictions inside self and in human thinking and behavior. This basic process, as previously discussed, is intentionally omitted from being taught in societies to prevent critical thinking and analysis. And this is why most people are able to live with massive contradictions and not sense the conflict or the source of the conflict even while contributing to it and causing ill effects on other creations and while also incurring ill effects from one's own contradictory logic and the contradictory logic of other humans.
While the speaker in the above video is correct about the Right To Farm notion and law, his discussion is filled with contradictions, too many to delve into at this moment. A thought process litter filled with contradictions is unavoidable when a person's context worldview utamawazo is contradictory. In other words a contradictory foundation, framework and roof will cause a person to fill their head with lots of other contradictory stuff, and then call that place, home, despite it actually being an unhealthy space and prison-like. Consider how this applies individually, but then quickly consider this in relation to how places such as the USA were constructed. The USA was built on contradictions even before they left Europe, thus the USA has always been full of copious conflicts and a worldwide instigator of conflicts.
Truth applies to one and all, large and small. Acknowledge this balanced logic always and it will help correct fix a lot of logic glitches.
Going back to the video, understand clearly that a main purpose of a lawsuit is to adjudicate and make a decision as to contradictions of logic. In human settings, these lawsuit disputes of logic are processed through multiple layers of logic that is further filled with many contradictions. Thus, almost all outcomes of lawsuits, even starting from their ability to be brought forth, has and will continue to result in contradictory decisions overall and even on principles and even from case to case. Having this awareness will help us not be so easily screwed and confused by what is taking place in self, other humans, human constructs and also what is taking place in the superhuman world that is also always processing logic.
Lastly I'm going to plainly say what I was trying not to say because those who will understand my next statement will figure it out on their own.
I guarantee this person in the video is a staunch Maafa Racist. His litany of contradictory logic is classic racist thinking who feel their rights have been infringed upon but do not feel they have infringed upon rights to the extent that it has created the conditions for their own rights to be infringed upon more and more and more. Listen closely sentence by sentence and you can hear and feel the contradictions that racists spout and carry out daily. This person wants the Right To Farm and speaks of some human universal rights, yet then adds in the right to be in business while not resolving the conflict with the common good. This person is against factory farming but unlikely to be against factory farming of humans who work as harvesters on farms or as employees in corporations. The problem is the conditions these people work in, including pay and other incentives to stay on the farm that conflicts with other rights of creation. The undetected contradictory logic problem that creates outer conflict is not solely problematic with this person, but through generations of this person and millions of this person who have constructed societies swirling with contradictions, thus most members of the favored group incur contradictions due to a system of their own making.
One of the intents of this message is to continue to remind Africans of deep-seated and stealthily couched contradictory logic is, thus the resulting conflicts are not blamed on the logic but rather on persons, places and things further and farther away from the source. Thus we Africans must be careful of the ear-tickling rhetoric of people who say one thing that sounds good to us. We'd better check a lot of their other logic to see how it all fits. Of course, in order to do so, we must apply this process to self.
