(9auu of 11)
Inca agrees with Ank (Ankh, Ying), the king, the ever-living. This is according to the typology said to have been formulated in Egypt, but most likely, like all things Egyptian, had an assist from other places in the Nile Valley. (AE1), (NG1)Inca is Ankha, but we find no additional clues using Ankha.
Inca is Ank is Nka. Nka becomes Nca and Nga.
Nca leads to Inca.
Nga has been much discussed and leads to Nga, Nga-Nga, Ngape, Naga, Nigga, Nigger.
The Egyptian Ank is Anoch in Coptic. Ank is Inga in Limbu (thus we can more easily see how Inca came about).
The root of ANK is expressed by the sound of Nk or Ng. This still exists in some African dialects as a nasal sound followed by a k-click, “UN-KA,” (Unka) is a nasal click that is one of the earliest attempts to utter by means of the nose and throat with breath and click the compound sound kh, nk or ng.
This nk sound, combined with “Ka” as a prefix, leads to words such as Kong, King, Pankh, Punk and Punch. Thus Ank is an ode to and connection to the first humans, the clickers.
Though there are many texts offering information about the Inca, I don't see any further “reliable” sources that are not awash in the hogwash of the European context and its self-contradictions and self-okie dokes that wants us to continue to believe that although humans are hundreds of thousands of years old that nothing much happened until about 5000 BCE in Egypt and then things really got cranking around 332 BCE when the Romans and Greeks, now turned white, invaded Egypt. From that point we are misled to believe that it was then that things rapidly progressed into turbo drive for humans in the Common Era (AD Era) when Europeans (now viewed as meaning white folks) blessed the world with their superior intelligence. Thus then we are deceived to continue to believe that worldwide all earlier people prior to 5000 BCE either didn't exist or were composed of savages. We are sold the narrative that civilizations found elsewhere after 5000 BCE were few and far between in terms of achievements and pale in comparison to the tons of evidence of European settlements across the globe that all seem to start when some European made a discovery of the land where people already existed and then those late arrivals set the world on fire with their knowledge. This is true if we think of fire in the venereal sense.
Think of the psychopathic sociopathic logic involved. White people want us to think that all other people on the planet were clueless as to their own existence until white people came along and discovered them so that their history could begin out of a primitive prehistoric state and everything about the people would be put in the worldview of white folks. This is the kind of history we've been taught, and still are for the most part, including on the god awful history channel.
Even without additional corroboration to satisfy European programmed minds that require mating with carbon dating, we can reasonably estimate that the Inca must have first come to Peru prior to 10920 BCE for reasons discussed in the previous two messages. This arrival would have been by water or by land from tribes already in the Americas.
If you can imagine a continent by continent timeline from 400,000 BCE to 2021 CE, what you should see is that every year is accounted for with plenty of overlap by multiple groups in multiple locations. However what you also find is that no timeline outside of Africa begins at 400,000 BCE, but rather begins later, starting with the arrival of an African.In other words, the African Continent timeline would begin with humans, but the timeline of all other continents would begin with Africans. This is true from north to south and east to west in those continents. Human history must begin as an Earth-based history that explains the birth and evolution of its species. This must run simultaneous with the spirit-souls of life that are not Earth-based but which do have a base on Earth.
According to the level of detail in those timelines, some of what you will find is many transitions of the people, their names, the geographic range of the country and the transition from the people having black complexions to having other complexions.
What you will also find as you compose those timelines are contradictions that always seem to favor Europeans. You will also find constant statements from them regarding what “just can't be figured out.” They will portray history as consisting of gaping holes, when instead what exists is merely unpaved roads covered in overgrowth.
Peru is a form of Meru. Meru is a form of Muru, Meroe, Merowe, an island in Aethiopia. Meru is a secondary birthplace, not the original birthplace. This indicates that the Peruvians and their Inca name are offshoots of people and concepts that came from Meroe along the Nile. This then places the migration to Peru prior to the migration to the Egypt defined as north of the cataract at Aswan or at least close to simultaneous with the Age of Egypt which began at least in 73,000 BCE commensurate with the Stone Age and the much earlier building of the Great Pyramid based on Mythological evidence.
Peru is also a form of Naru, the nostrils and keen scent of the vulture, the bearing and nursing Mother.