Smoking Bans Compared To Covid-19 Mandates And RestrictionsUnity Consciousness #2613

(9azzzzj of 11)

The other day, as I was listening to a daily dullifying, yet informative news program that allows me to monitor the pulse of the status quo mob, I heard a woman, dubbed an expert of course, put forth the analogy that since we have smoking bans, it should be okay to have Covid-19 mandates. She said it was the same thing. The news anchor and other carefully screened chain linked groupthink panelists, rushed to concede and quickly agree.
I hesitated, said it makes sense, hesitated again and said this needs further investigation and examination. Why? Because I've learned that many things sound good or bad, right or wrong, initially on the surface when we hear them, but unless we investigate and critically analyze each logic component we can be misled by good sounding unsound logic, like the person who looks good, but is not or the person who is not physically appealing to us, but is a good person.

We know inhaling smoke from most sources is unhealthy. We know this for the simple fact that we cough. We cough because smoke is a respiratory system irritant.
The harmful effects of smoke, though disputable, are irrefutable.

What do we know about SARS-CoV-2? It is a virus with an infectious transmissible period. It can be spread in various ways, one subset of ways is from human to human in various ways. We know Covid is a member of a family of respiratory viruses.

When it comes to a smoking ban, we know it means no smoking using any means of smoking: cigarettes, cigars, pipes, blunts, bongs and so on. All forms of smoking that release smoke into the air is banned in certain places.
However, when it comes to a Covid ban, it only pertains to Covid-19 and not Covid-2003.
Furthermore it only pertains to coronavirus and not to other respiratory viruses, especially not influenza which is highly transmissible and kills millions worldwide every year, except magically not during 2020 and 2021 when influenza deaths were folded into and hidden in the Covid death count.

Thus, so far we can see how a smoking ban and Covid-19 mandates are not equal at all.

But let us go further and farther.

A non-smoking mandate says you can't smoke in certain places; however, if you are a smoker, you can still go into a non-smoking place as long as you don't smoke inside, and instead, smoke outside. A non-smoking mandate does not punish you for being a smoker or force you to become a non-smoker or wear a nicotine patch.
On the other hand, a Covid-19 mandate says you can't enter certain places, not because you have Covid-19, but because you are unvaccinated. You are restricted not because you have or had Covid-19 or a recent positive test and now a negative test, but because you are not either minimally or fully vaccinated according to the ever-changing definition of what these vaccination levels mean. You are restricted for being unvaccinated, not because you have Covid-19 and are in the transmissible stage. Others who are vaccinated are not restricted even though they can still get Covid-19 and are trusted to gauge their own symptomaticness. We trust the tests be they antigen or PCR, despite plenty proof that both are reliable for the intended purpose of deception but unreliable for the stated purpose of being able to distinguish between coronavirus and other viruses. The vaccinated are not restricted as long as they have a vaccination card, even though they might be in a transmissible stage of Covid-19, and intentionally or not, do not disclose. Thus, Covid-19 mandates endanger more lives due to the false sense of accuracy and false sense of security created.
Even so, many societies proceed full steam in attempts to restrict the unvaccinated despite now saying we have to live with Covid-19, but evidently we don't have to learn to live with the unvaccinated.
Covid-19 mandates do not restrict access to any place due a person's exposure to other respiratory viruses or other infectious pathogens. We don't ask, don't check and don't care because we have not been scared into a foolish frenzy. The pliable masses, only want to mandate people who are not Covid-19 vaccinated because they are scared to death for their lazy logic lives. The leaders of societies, hell bent on Covid-19 mandates, have ulterior motives to push vaccines into human bodies as yet another part of the Great Experiment. All you need to know is what you should know: “they don't really care about us.” (Michael Jackson)

A Covid-19 mandate forces people to choose to become vaccinated or suffer the consequences, whereas a non-smoking mandate does not force people to become non-smokers.
A non-smoking ban focuses on the appropriate cause and effect, thus allows a person who chooses to smoke to temporarily stop smoking with only minor adjustments needed.
However, on the other hand, a Coronavirus mandate does not focus on the appropriate cause and effect, thus a coronavirus mandate is actually a ban against the unvaccinated, as if the unvaccinated are the cause of the virus and its transmissibility.

The appropriate target of a Covid-19 mandate should be the virus and it's transmissible effect and transmissible stage. The target should not be people.
Coronavirus can be effectively mitigated by teaching early self-care, better nutrition (includes rest, fresh air, water and sunlight) and use of free antiviral plants and/or purchased antivirals and the use of those antivirals in hospital settings, rather than a rush to IV's and ventilators.

Clearly, most people have not yet ever contracted coronavirus.
Also what is clear is that many vaccinated people and many unvaccinated people have never contracted Covid-19.
Meanwhile, many vaccinated people have contracted Rona, after being vaccinated.
Thus, vaccination status should not be the focus of Covid-19 mandates and restrictions. It's idiotic and despotic.
Furthermore, I have never contracted coronavirus, and if so, I have quickly laid it to rest with antiviral plants found in my yard, except for the ginger.
Secondly, and over a longer anecdotal period of proof, I have also never contracted the influenza virus, despite never getting a vaccine and being around many people year after year in many settings from school to workplaces to public transportation and so on.

A Covid-19 mandate aimed at the unvaccinated, does not allow a person to alter behavior during times of transmissibility and non-transmissibility. Instead a Covid-19 mandate forces most people to get vaccines they don't want, and once they do, then they can't switch back to being unvaccinated when they are not in places with Covid-19 restrictions.

What a Covid-19 mandate does is shift the blame to those who refuse to play the game. A Covid-19 mandate also tries to cover up the fact that vaccines supposedly work, yet are not enough to protect the vaccinated and keep them from once again becoming transmissible.

When it comes to smoking bans we rightly recognize smoke as the problem, not a person who smokes. However, when it comes to coronavirus mandates, we the people, in order to create a more perfect confusion, wrongly implicate unvaccinated people as the problem. We pigheadedly and bullheadedly add weak guaranteed results insurance to stupidity by anointing a human-made vaccine as the hero who replaces innate immunity and natural immunity and many natural antiviral plants. Thus then, people who do not accept the heroes, saviors and side-effect plagued solutions of the society, are relegated to the rear, bottom and outside as villains, pariahs and lepers.

This is why the comparison of a non-smoking mandate to a Covid-19 mandate is grossly unequal, improper and invalid, yet able to self-deceive experts and their believers.

I am the other side of supreme scientific logic whose time has come, gone and now returns via the mainstream of the Milky Ways. I am poised to prevail, no matter how long the shift takes, which is right around the corner.